The only Star Wars movie that would interest me is a Stand Alone Darth Vader movie as the protaginist.
Samtemdo8 said:The only Star Wars movie that would interest me is a Stand Alone Darth Vader movie as the protaginist.
I don't know, I can sort of see the value in it but mainly because Revenge of the Sith screwed the pooch by having Anakin murder the Jedi younglings, something that is just fucking reprehensible, as opposed to maybe slaying his fellow Knight-Generals in combat to give weight to the belief that his (short-term) gains by turning to the Dark Side could prevent the death of his wife and children so I think a movie that might hint or give direction to the goodness Luke claims still resides in his father's heart actually existing could work.Ezekiel said:Only if it's a slice of life, showing how miserable it is to be Darth Vader.Samtemdo8 said:The only Star Wars movie that would interest me is a Stand Alone Darth Vader movie as the protaginist.
I don't want Vader to be glorified any more than he already has been. The entire film series has featured Anakin now. Let it go.
So it's better then the worst SW movie to date. I wouldn't call that a resounding endorsement tbh, but hey from the sounds of it half a decent movie is still in the upper half of quality for the franchise given the prequels and FA.RaikuFA said:Saw it last night. First half is boring and the 2nd half is worth it IMO. Better than CW where it was boring from beginning to end.
Do you think you're objectively correct about everything you believe? I mean seriously, now anyone who praises Toy Story is just blinded by nostalgia rather than having any cogent argument to back up their opinion.Zontar said:By some, maybe. Guess having not seen the original two at the right age made the nostalgia not factor in for me, so I could see the gaping flaws the movie had (it's a solid 8, I'll admit, but it's no 9, and it's definitely no 10).Gethsemani said:Considering that Toy Story 3 is often seen as one of the premier children's movies of our generation
Nope, not at all, though that assumption is odd given there's nothing in my comment that implies that was the case, so that's an odd question to come out of nowhere.TheMajesticSpaceDuck said:Do you think you're objectively correct about everything you believe?
You're statement does seem to imply that that's the only reason to rate Toy Story 3 so highly. But if that wasn't how you meant it my bad. I'll drop it.Zontar said:Nope, not at all, though that assumption is odd given there's nothing in my comment that implies that was the case, so that's an odd question to come out of nowhere.TheMajesticSpaceDuck said:Do you think you're objectively correct about everything you believe?
But in any event, if you're really going to argue that Toy Story 3 deserves a 99% rating, then you're going to have to actually prove it, because you're the one making an objective claim (that being that Toy Story 3 is one of the greatest movies ever made). Given how the score is almost entirely nostalgia driven (a perfect case in point being countries that didn't have the original two released theatrically giving a significantly lower score to the movie) and the fact the movie has quite a few problems, that's going to be one hell of an uphill argument.
In any event, I've always been open about the fact my own taste is far from great. My favourite movies are ones I wouldn't give more then a 6 to, and some of my favourite games are ones I can understand someone saying it sucks.
I like the Thrawn trilogy but i don't think you're wrong in calling him a Marty Stu xD I guess part of thrawn's appeal is he is a marty stu for the empire, and when you're kind of sick of the rebels always having everything magically work out for them (will of the force and all that), it was nice having a character on the imperial side who could out-stu them. Even Ackbar, who gets transformed in the EU as some uber military master mind stu (all because he said "it's a trap" in return of the jedi you see, fully demonstrating his grasp of strategy and the obvious) meets his match here.Happyninja42 said:Like me for example, I can't stand the Thrawn trilogy, despite the majority of Star Wars fans considering it the fucking holy grail of writing. I think it's utter shit and that Thrawn is a ridiculous Marty Stu character.
Even today after much time has passed, that scene still pisses me off.Ezekiel said:He takes out eleven TIE fighters and some ground troops in twenty seconds. Bullshit bullshit bullshit.
......When has Star Wars movies ever been 2D animation?Ezekiel said:Where's this 99 percent? The RT page says 100 percent. 100 percent just means 100 percent of the 78 gave it a positive review; not that it's one of the greatest, most perfect movies ever made. And they're correct. It is a good movie.
Having said that, I hate the movie for killing (superior) 2D animation.
Think he's talking about the first Toy Story movie.Samtemdo8 said:......When has Star Wars movies ever been 2D animation?Ezekiel said:Where's this 99 percent? The RT page says 100 percent. 100 percent just means 100 percent of the 78 gave it a positive review; not that it's one of the greatest, most perfect movies ever made. And they're correct. It is a good movie.
Having said that, I hate the movie for killing (superior) 2D animation.
TBF, you don't have to do much to be better than Clone Wars. The 2nd half is still fun.Zontar said:So it's better then the worst SW movie to date. I wouldn't call that a resounding endorsement tbh, but hey from the sounds of it half a decent movie is still in the upper half of quality for the franchise given the prequels and FA.RaikuFA said:Saw it last night. First half is boring and the 2nd half is worth it IMO. Better than CW where it was boring from beginning to end.
While I won't proclaim to be an expert in animation, has it occurred to you that if Disney had stubbornly stuck with 2D after Pixar had proven the viability of 3D and say Universal had bought Pixar out then Disney as we know may no longer exist? I know that sounds insane and I love traditional animation too, but Disney made the right choice by seeing where audience wants were going and decided to stay in the game. Like it or lump it champ, but I'll take a world of 3D Disney Animation rather than one where Disney Animation is referred to in wholly past tense.Ezekiel said:Yes. There's not a single CG animated movie that I wouldn't rather see traditionally animated. Toy Story was the beginning of the end.TheMajesticSpaceDuck said:Think he's talking about the first Toy Story movie.Samtemdo8 said:......When has Star Wars movies ever been 2D animation?Ezekiel said:Where's this 99 percent? The RT page says 100 percent. 100 percent just means 100 percent of the 78 gave it a positive review; not that it's one of the greatest, most perfect movies ever made. And they're correct. It is a good movie.
Having said that, I hate the movie for killing (superior) 2D animation.
I think Wreck It Ralph is the only movie that benefitted from being CG animated as it actually suited the setting. But yeah, hand drawn or stop motion would be my preference by a huge margin. I think CG is fine, certainly passable but I've never really been blown away by the artwork the way I have been with beautiful traditional animation or stop motion. Even crude animation has managed to be wonderful, like the under water or drug trip episode of Bojack Horseman. Very simple animation style but still manages to do some gorgeous things with limited resources.Ezekiel said:Yes. There's not a single CG animated movie that I wouldn't rather see traditionally animated. Toy Story was the beginning of the end.TheMajesticSpaceDuck said:Think he's talking about the first Toy Story movie.Samtemdo8 said:......When has Star Wars movies ever been 2D animation?Ezekiel said:Where's this 99 percent? The RT page says 100 percent. 100 percent just means 100 percent of the 78 gave it a positive review; not that it's one of the greatest, most perfect movies ever made. And they're correct. It is a good movie.
Having said that, I hate the movie for killing (superior) 2D animation.