Role-Playing Games

DaxStrife

Late Reviewer
Nov 29, 2007
657
0
0
I don't know why, but I love seeing someone else who actually knows about and/or played Vampire: Bloodlines [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vampire_bloodlines]. That was probably the last game I played that really felt like a real RPG, with some decent choice thrown in. Even TES4: Oblivion, with all its free roaming and exploration, was very limited in choice and the dialogue was like a bad joke.
 

ZippyDSMlee

New member
Sep 1, 2007
3,959
0
0
Zaydin said:
I've actually come to decide that JRPGs aren't RPGs at all. For starters, the player rarely, if ever has an impact on the story or the characters choices. The one JRPG I've seen that has a degree of that is the Shin Megami Tensei games. JRPGs rail-road you down one and only one possible story path. Western RPGs like Jade Empire, Knights of the Old Republic, and Dragon Age let you choose how your character acts and what they do; role-playing. JRPGs only real RPG element is the party building and stat building. And again, western RPGs let you customize how your character looks, acts, etc etc, versus JRPGs where you are forced to play a stupid idiot like Neku from TWEWY (Don't get me wrong, TWEWY is fun, but it's still overall a traditional JRPG, story wise)
Ya but WRPGs tend to be short,small and screwy...then again Jrpgs are blaoted grind fests LOL

Yes I am not a happy camper :p
 

ZippyDSMlee

New member
Sep 1, 2007
3,959
0
0
DaxStrife said:
I don't know why, but I love seeing someone else who actually knows about and/or played Vampire: Bloodlines [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vampire_bloodlines]. That was probably the last game I played that really felt like a real RPG, with some decent choice thrown in. Even TES4: Oblivion, with all its free roaming and exploration, was very limited in choice and the dialogue was like a bad joke.
Vampire: Bloodlines is mroe a adventure action RPG and a pretty good one at that bugs aside, Oblivoin is a simple action RPG liek FO3 is >>
 

ZeroDotZero

New member
Sep 18, 2009
646
0
0
I've found this, and the Torchlight review quite lacking.

The only good thing is that I found out why Borderlands hasn't been reviewed. Oh well, hope it's a bit better next week.
 

Dana22

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,274
0
0
RPG genres are well definied, you just forgot to do some research.

RPG - Thats the classic Pen and Paper.

CRPG - thats the "hardcore" RPG PC game usually with strong emphasis on actuall role playing, stats, numbers and die rolls. Examples would be, Baldurs Gate, Neverwinter Nights or recent Dragon Age.

JRPG - Self explanatory.

Action RPG - More dynamic (usually combat-wise) game but still about talking with things, killing things, doing quests, collecting gear and what not. Vampire Masquerade Redemption,
Mass Effect or Gothic series are examples of this (sub)genre.

Role Playing Shooter - sub sub (!) gerne of Action RPG, focusing on shooting things (duh) usually from first person, while leveling, learning skillz and other RPG stuff (thou its more shallow then Action RPG). Like in Borderlands, Bioshock, System Shock and such.

Hack and Slash - Yep Torchlight is a HnS. And these kind of games are about, as we all know, clicking a lot, killing a lot, looting a lot. Theres not much "RP" in HnS games, but the core mechanics like leveling or skills are the same.

These are major genres (or sub geners, who gives a sh*t anyway). Hope that helps and you wont be so confused anymore !
 

The Youth Counselor

New member
Sep 20, 2008
1,004
0
0
Fuhjem said:
Hmm, renaming the genres could be hard. The only one I can think of would be to replace RPGs and JRPGs.

Avatar Development Game (ADG or Avment Game) - Takes the place of Role-Playing Games. Describes how you develop your avatar by choosing your actions.

Tactical Cinematic Game (TCG or CineTac) - Takes the place of JRPGs. Describes a game in which main story progression comes from cinematics and combat is more tactical such as selecting and combining combat moves with other characters.

Meh, those ideas kinda suck, but it's worth a try.
No, I like your ideas. It is a worthy endeavor, one I wholly support.

BlueInkAlchemist said:
Thank you for mentioning Bloodlines. Despite some graphical and gameplay issues, it's a highly underrated RPG.
Yes. Thank you Yahtzee. That was the last great RPG in my opinion. With choice in my opinion. It's a crying shame Troika closed, and it's even more of a shame I gave Activision money for the game for they fired the developers! That's one of the few examples in which pirating is in the right.

Tiamat666 said:
Diablo is even less an RPG as your options in Diablo are severly limited. All you can do in Diablo is kill stuff and sell loot. The GTA games are more RPG than Diablo is. In GTA you can be a racecar driver, a taxi driver, a policeman, a thug (naturally), a casino player, an assassin...
Seriously, I don't even know how Diablo is classified as such. I guess it's because it uses the level up system carried over from pen and paper RPGs, so it carries the monkier. But there are no choices! You do all the same quests and besides the order of enemies you kill, you only choose your occupation, item selection, and name.

The made up name I gave for the Doomguy and the inventory I amassed for him is just as deep. But it's choice of camera disqualifies it from the RPG category.
 

DarkSaber

New member
Dec 22, 2007
476
0
0
RyVal said:
DarkSaber said:
Also funny to be called a "kid" for liking Borderlands when I'm older than him, but ah well I only follow his work for the humour (which is missing in this article), he's not exactly a Pullitzer contender.
Feel free to go onto TV Tropes' "Dethroning Moments of Suck" section and join in with all the other jilted fanboys whining that Yahtzee mocked their favourite game.
It's not my favorite game though. And since my favorite game is System Shock 2, and going from his references Yahtzee likes it too, this seems unlikely to occur.
 

Pegghead

New member
Aug 4, 2009
4,017
0
0
The whole time I was reading your article with every single phrase I thought "The fans are going to get very angry in the comments". Turns out I was right. In terms of pets in games that goes back to the old Text-graphic (Environments, NPCs and items all represented by the alphabet) games on the early home computers. I suppose their thinking is that all people who will play a true blue Role Playing Game will be honest and play their close to home role of a toned adventurer who slays dragons by day and sleeps with elven women by night as opposed to the acne-riddled nerds seeking escapism who dominate the RPG crowd, and with that role they're going to need a little sidekick to make their muscle-bound hero have power over some creature (Or person) smaller and weaker than them, giving the player a sense of power.

And thus all problems with RPGs you constantly mention (Such as yappy sidekicks, ridiculous character customization and/or character progression) can be traced back to the dweebs so un-satisfied with their life they feel the need to dismiss their existence in favour of pumping hours into the latest role-playing game just to obtain the slim sense of satisfaction they can gather after THEIR musclebound magic warrior with the mighty sword of Trog-bollocks has just defeated the evil Ice dragon who was keeping the sick orphans hostage in his ice lair. And when you have the choice to either rescue the orphans, cure all their diseases and find them some care-takers or cut their stomachs open and take a shower in their half-digested meals (Like in ALL rpgs nowadays which give you some form of moral choice) the devlopers have succeeded in pandering to the players depraved fantasies...Oh, I'm a player...
 

FinalHeart95

New member
Jun 29, 2009
2,164
0
0
Opinions are opinions, and I like JRPGs, or whatever you feel like calling them. Hell, I don't hate whole genres of anything. Even the genres I like less that others, such as Strategy and Fighting, have some games that I like.

It's impossible to dislike an entire genre. You may have less games that you like from that genre, or just not the way it plays, but every genre must have something that you enjoy. If there isn't, you either haven't found it yet or have your mind set on brutal, irrational, hatred.
 

Captain Pancake

New member
May 20, 2009
3,453
0
0
Slycne said:
AceInTheHole16 said:
What is the name of this Bar and/or Book going to be?
Mana Bar [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/97387-Yahtzee-and-Pals-to-Open-Videogame-Bar] and Mogworld [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/95677-EXCLUSIVE-Dark-Horse-Books-Announces-Ben-Yahtzee-Croshaws-Debut-Novel-Mogworld].
I would just love it if the bar was in the uncanny valley instead of fortitude valley...

I'll ask my uncle to check it out sometime, then!
 

The Youth Counselor

New member
Sep 20, 2008
1,004
0
0
Fronzel said:
Oh, boy, complaints about nomenclature. That's really important. How are game makers going to make good games if they don't know what short phrases to use to describe them?

The Youth Counselor said:
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas came up with an innovative method of handling player character progression. Every single action would eventually add up to their physical look and power. Run around, swim, and ride a bike a lot and Carl Johnson becomes slimmer and faster. Drive everywhere, eat a lot of fast food and sitting alot makes him grow fatter. Exercising makes hand to hand combat easier, and fighting regularly in general makes it better. Instead of assigning a stat through experience as a whole, the game took into account every individual action and assigned it to the appropriate place.
But doesn't that require the player to work too hard to improve their character? Too much like real life?
But don't we play games partially because of the challenge? It's no more harder than clicking random animals and burying their bones over to gain a level up. But it does add a piece of immersion and realism, when instead of a random stat chosen after the action, it levels up what the player was doing.
 

Calatar

New member
May 13, 2009
379
0
0
Mertruve said:
Yes, this was the gist of quite a lot of the Torchlight feedback. Yes, you can certainly hold the mouse button down to keep attacking an enemy, but my concern was about needless energy loss, and keeping the mouse button depressed is still a far worse solution than just clicking once to keep attacking an enemy until they die.
Uh, I didn't hear any complaints about constantly clicking on enemies in Modern Warfare 2 (holding the mouse down button is also required if you have an MG!).
This. I mean seriously, one of his major complaints about a PC video game was it required too much clicking? I'm sorry, did the pain from all that terrible duress of holding down a button with a tenth-pound of force get to you?
He also claims that he'd never change his mind after attacking a certain enemy, but certain attacks have debuffs attached, or perhaps you have an area spell you want to use. There are a variety of reasons why you might not want to continue attacking the same enemy continuously, and there is an easy system to do it if you did.
In the review he even complained about how the game had too many hotkeys you could set.

I'm finding again and again that Yahtzee is popular not because he makes meaningful reviews, but because he is "hilariously" negative about everything, warranted or not.
He wants games to be new and fresh. When they are, he complains about how they're different. When they aren't he complains about how they're the same.

Sorry all this free entertainment doesn't meet your exacting standards.
Somebody can't take criticism anywhere near as well as they can dish it out.
If you're going to be an insulting prick, yet still be popular, you can't act like everybody who disagrees with you is just being whiny. Well... you CAN, but that goes back to the insulting prick part.

I've come to realize that many of your pedantic criticisms come from a need for content to fill your rapid-fire reviews combined with your obsessive compulsive need to nitpick everything that could possible be annoying in a game and magnify it to a different level.
This combines to produce a rating system that judges nearly all games in existence to be garbage. Seeing as your target audience is gamers, who play these games, and may *gasp* even like them, you might be surprised they have opinions of their own. But all odds against it, they do, and some of them might even complain that your judgment is lacking important facts! Given that you only have enough time to play these games for a few days before making your judgment, they may even be right!

I hardly think that disagreeing with you amounts to imposing "exacting standards." But I could be wrong.
 

WaderiAAA

Derp Master
Aug 11, 2009
869
0
0
I thought about that when I saw someone call Zelda an RPG, I mean honestly - it could be called that if the definition is a game where you play a role.
 

ItsAPaul

New member
Mar 4, 2009
762
0
0
Watch Torchlight get a "Yahtzee mod" where clicking once auto-attacks until you click something else. That and the millions of auto-identify mods (considering all you have to do for that is change one value to yes or true or whatever) might solve some of Yahtzee's basic problems. He does have a point that identifying is retarded if there's not cursed items and such.

About RPGs, if Strength is for melee and Dexterity/Agility is for ranged, its pretty much an rpg. I've never played a good game qualified as an rpg and gone "man I wish RPG had better classification," as its usually "can't someone come up with a better way to progress than leveling?" I don't mind leveling, but you'd figure Bioware or someone would mix things up a bit by now.
 

NamesAreHardToPick

New member
Jan 7, 2010
177
0
0
Onyx Oblivion said:
JRPGs are still RPGs in my book.

If it has stats, its an RPG.
Truth. Ye shall know them by their character sheets.

I think it's hilarious how everyone rags on JRPGs like a Dragon Warrior cartridge shot their dog back in the NES days. Why act so butt-hurt? It's funny because you don't get these conversations about any other bland product like mac 'n cheese... "baww its only one flavor!" "it's not very good for you!" "its for kids!!1"
 

remm2004

New member
Nov 18, 2009
14
0
0
Not much to talk about, indeed.

Anyway, I?m going to jump on the bandwagon and suggest a game I?d like you to review:
Monster Hunter
It?s an incredibly addictive game that gives you a great sense of accomplishment when you manage to bring down a huge lizard.
MH Freedom Unite came out back on June for the PSP and MH 3 for the Wii (it uses the Classic Controller) will be out in April