It's interesting that through all of this, you didn't think that the original post was not intended to be serious, at all, in the slightest regardless of my thoughts on the issue.klasbo said:You can, but it is simply not needed. That is the core of why the current paradigm works so brilliantly in explaining the world around us.Autofaux said:And yet one can have faith in science.
Because people are - on average - ignorant. Noone can have perfect information about anything, and noone can ever hope to understand that information if they had it. We're human. This is why we use a method which does its best to eliminate human interaction and biases: science.Autofaux said:Although science adjusts its beliefs based on what's observed, people will believe whatever they hell they want regardless of what is fact or not.
Science would not be the religion, if that were the case. The faith would be a logical fallacy of the "Argument from Authority" type (Professor X believes A, Professor X speaks from authority, therefore A is true). This is not faith in science, this is blind faith in people who do science. This is ignorance.Autofaux said:Thus, why science, or really anything, can be religion. Maybe not organised religion, but still.
I don't think this is the correct thread. Send a PM or start a new thread somewhere else.
I know it's not the correct thread. You know it's not the correct thread. Why tell me?