Well it was my understanding that they'll do what they always do and just base it off a city like New York for Liberty, Los santos for Los angeles and so forth. I was just saying to him it doesn't make any sense to say they're running out of ideas for using Los santos again when liberty city has been done so often too. They'll just redesign it like they always do.thethingthatlurks said:Pretty sure it's just easier to copy an existing location than to create an entirely new concept. Never been a huge fan of Liberty City myselfOutright Villainy said:What? They've done liberty city 3 times now.The_ModeRazor said:And SA fans, there's your fucking wish: they really are going back there.
Guess Rockstar must be running out of ideas.
Now's an awful specific time to say they're running out of ideas.
Indeed.FinalDream said:Until the word hits the net that the next GTA will be fun I won't give a damn what they do.
I think FinalDream was hinting at the fact that GTA IV somehow wasn't fun, which is wrong of course.no oneder said:I don't know where you've been, or for how long, but GTA has always been good.FinalDream said:Until the word hits the net that the next GTA will be fun I won't give a damn what they do.
Rockstar North is based in Edinburgh, they are BritishDJmagma said:i don't think GTA will ever go to London, even though that's where every Englishmen wants it to be. i just don't think rockstar could inject American humor into a foreign place,a t least without it being non stop jokes about London stereotypes.
didn't they already do California?
I disagree. San Andreas was so much fun because you didn't have to take anything seriously, it was a giant parody of a huge slice of American Culture. The huge game world and endless variety of side missions, vehicles and weapons meant that once you finished the campaign you had so much potential to play it as a sandbox. GTA IV, by comparison, tried to have its cake and eat it too by including a gritty and dark storyline but keeping the parody elements, and they culled a whole bunch of stuff in the name of realism, so much that it put me off. A game more like San Andreas would be a return to form for Rockstar.Crazycat690 said:I didn't like San Andreas, it was too over the top, one minute you're a 'Gangsta from da hood' and in the next minute you're infiltrating a military base, on you're own, to steal A JETPACK! Sure it's a cute idea, but it's not GTA! Vice City was good, and I liked the realism in Gta4. I don't get why people complain about it, YES IT'S FUN! And the expansions gave you a tank and parashute!
Play Vice City, You get that AND a Chainsaw.EHKOS said:GTA JAPAN! I want a samurai sword to play with! And there should be a mission which somehow entails me using a giant robotic dinosaur to go crashing through the city while people yell Godzilla.
GTA Brighton?Woodsey said:I'd rather they just gave a faceless robot if that's all they can muster.Deofuta said:Nice, I just hope they do as good of a job with the protagonist as they did with Nico.
OT: Can't they do somewhere OTHER than America?
I'm thinking...
Norwich.
It would be nice to see modern day Vice City. I imagine it having some sort of nods or jokes about Burn Notice.MarsProbe said:I think FinalDream was hinting at the fact that GTA IV somehow wasn't fun, which is wrong of course.no oneder said:I don't know where you've been, or for how long, but GTA has always been good.FinalDream said:Until the word hits the net that the next GTA will be fun I won't give a damn what they do.
It would be neat for them to visit a different city, though I also wouldn't midn seeing what a present day Vice City looks like.
COUSIN! Lets go take a tour of Universal!Sir Kemper said:And Niko thought the people of liberty city were annoying...