Rumor: Lingerie Model Replacing Megan Fox in Transformers 3

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
Disaster Button said:
So they're getting a different actor to play the same character?

I hate when that happens.
Same here, but then again, I don't think it'll matter too much. I'll probably like her even more anyway, this new girl. She's actually a lot better looking than Megan Fox :).
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
MiracleOfSound said:
She probably can't act for shit, but at least she'll be nicer to look at than Megan Fox.
Quoted for truth

I totally agree
 

wooty

Vi Britannia
Aug 1, 2009
4,252
0
0
Still relying on stick insects and slight sex appeal to ring in a bit more cash are we Bay? Will sadly probably work.

I'm still holding out for the next movie to be entitled- Transformers 3: The Return of the Plot
 
Aug 17, 2009
1,019
0
0
Aww I thought her name was Whitey. I was going to post...Well f*ck it, I'm posting it anyway:





Ten Internets to the first person to get it.
 

OceanRunner

New member
Mar 18, 2009
1,145
0
0
HT_Black said:
Hey, here's an idea, Mike: drop the walking uncanny valley effects who can't act, lose the teenage drama crap, cut out the US army, and do what you're best at:

FILM GIANT CGI ROBOTS BEATING THE SHIT OUT OF EACH OTHER. IT'S WHAT YOU DO.

Seriously, if you just did that, the third film might actually be halfway decent, at least as far as explosive clip shows go. Anyone with me?
100% The Transformer/Human screentime ratio on the previous films was so bad, they may as well have called them "Humans" and "Humans 2: More Bullshit We Don't Care About"
 

Zyphonee

New member
Mar 20, 2010
207
0
0
wow... I saw the name of the article and started laughing. This would make a hell of a joke, but it just falls into "oh god" category as a news post...

This does nothing but show that to be a "talented" actor or musician, or, well, anything slightly related to fame, you need to be pretty and nothing more.

Beautiful you are, society
 

Ohlookit'sMatty

New member
Sep 11, 2008
951
0
0
Or maybe they could get rid off all the human characters for the next movie and we might get something good for once

-M
 

Rawker

New member
Jun 24, 2009
1,115
0
0
Disaster Button said:
So they're getting a different actor to play the same character?

I hate when that happens.
Indeed comrade. Especially when they deny anything changed, and the actor was practically made for the character and they leave.

Although this doesn't apply here, seeing as how they could have just hired a hooker to replace her and the acting would have been a step up.
 

The Warden

New member
Oct 6, 2009
880
0
0
It's funny cause the majority of you would fuck the everloving hell out of Megan Fox if she asked you to.
 

Disaster Button

Elite Member
Feb 18, 2009
5,237
0
41
Soviet Heavy said:
Disaster Button said:
So they're getting a different actor to play the same character?

I hate when that happens.
Umm, The Dark Knight had Maggie Gylennhall play Rachel Dawes, and she was much better than the girl from Batman Begins.

Not all actor changes are bad. This one however, will be bad regardless.
I never saw Batman Begins so it didn't bother me.
 

IrrelevantTangent

New member
Oct 4, 2008
2,424
0
0
Furburt said:
She's...unsettling looking.

Maybe it's just a bad picture, but she's got a weird waxy tint to her, like she's been embalmed.

Anyway, better than Fox.
You could cast a cybernetically-enhanced corpse with dried vomit on its face and wearing Buffalo Bill's [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jame%20gumb&rlz=1R2ADSA_enUS360&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw] clothes for the same part and it would still look better than Fox.

That said, I've never liked Transformers the film series, got to be honest. BUT...if the Unfortunate Implications-prone jive turkey Twins are taken away, and the immaturity is dialed down a huge notch, then maybe...I'll consider it. 'till then, it's just another movie to me.
 

Marv21

New member
Jan 1, 2009
957
0
0
I think in this is the first step to forgetting Megan Fox existed in 2 years...its going to be hard to get her a film role, everyone knowing that shes a *****, and how she called the director that stook his neck out for her, "a Napeleon and a Hitler"....shure she can be hot I guess. But no director will want to hire her now knowing what she is....goodbye Megan Fox the only people that will miss you will forget you in less than 2 years if you don't get your act together.
 

chozo_hybrid

What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.
Jul 15, 2009
3,479
14
43
Couldn't they have dissolved her role in an off-screen death?
 

daftalchemist

New member
Aug 6, 2008
545
0
0
If an insider source for Geek Week can be believed, her replacement will be a Victoria's Secret lingerie model with relatively little acting experience.
So she'll be able to act as badly as Megan Fox does without looking like a $2 truck stop hooker? Sounds like an improvement to me!
 

FoolKiller

New member
Feb 8, 2008
2,409
0
0
danpascooch said:
Of course they chose a lingerie model, the last thing they would want is to CAST AN ACTOR in that role!
Exactly! Why would they cast an actor for a movie without a script?
 

Plurralbles

New member
Jan 12, 2010
4,611
0
0
Um... Replacing one shallow pretty face with a less trashy one?

Yep, Bay, that's what the fans wanted. Completely.
 

Plurralbles

New member
Jan 12, 2010
4,611
0
0
The Warden said:
It's funny cause the majority of you would fuck the everloving hell out of Megan Fox if she asked you to.
I'm sorry but how does that qualify her for a movie?

And oh yeah, some of us might be anti social and our crusheswere all fucked by the captain of the football team while his friends threw us in lockers(exaggeration). I think the people of the escapist might just be angry because we can never get that ass, so we must hate her because she represents a lot of what's wrong with the world.