Ya get it!?Crazzee said:The link on the black hole one leads to a dead page...Interesting column though.
Ya get it!?Crazzee said:The link on the black hole one leads to a dead page...Interesting column though.
Oh, you know, stuff. For instance, you could hollow one out and use it for a cereal bowl. Pornography, too.swaki said:...everything else?, beside watching programs what else did you use it for before you started to use the Internet?Fbuh said:The only thing I use a television for is gaming. The internet replaced everything else I'd ever need from a television.
PSSS. Animals don't have souls!somekindarobot said:Hooray! Hooray, I say, for this wonderful day of science!
OP: Couldn't the sword thing be done with animal bones? Or is there something of so special about human bones?
Oh man, I just got flashbacks to middle school.scifidownbeat said:I quite admire your article, Lauren! Ha-ha-ha, heh heh...
I love me some puns!
WhiteTiger225 said:Ya get it!?Crazzee said:The link on the black hole one leads to a dead page...Interesting column though.
It will take 2000 light years??? to reach the blackhole And how much energy will be needed for the journey? If this is in place garbage disposal fee will be in the thousand/100kg sth like that. CERN have not built blackhole larger than the head of a small pin. Its just not technologically viable yet.The Rogue Wolf said:Because as it gained mass, the black hole would eventually consume more and more of whatever was around it. Sort of like a brother-in-law who "visits" for a "weekend" and eventually expands to the size of your fold-away guest bed while eating all the food in the house.Capo Taco said:Also, can't we just throw all that trash into black holes?
[small]Seriously, that's exactly how Stephen Hawking described it. Only he did it with his cool speech synthesizer.[/small]
Also, huzzah for a new article! Will Lauren Admire reach those dizzying heights of scientific awesomeness inhabited by the likes of Mr. Wizard, Bill Nye and Beakman? Only time will tell!
I like the thought of preserving the memory of a loved one in something actually utilitarian, especially cool like a sword. What else might one use a deceased relatives remains to help create?Lauren Admire said:I agree, the sword story was a bit of a stretch. But, come on, SWORDS! I had to make it work in any way possible.
Actually Earth was already destroyed.LewsTherin said:I think that Science has a running bet to see how long it takes for someone to destroy the planet. But that's just me.
Well spoken =)Silva said:Nice, a science column. Kinda makes The Escapist a decent supplement to the 6+ hours I spend every day consuming media. Of course, for me, you guys will never replace New Scientist for science news. Just nice to have more interesting information coming in per week.
To those who worry about "black hole apocalypse":
CERN is awesome for what they contribute to the world, and they are absolutely right. There is no chance that the black hole made in the hadron collider would explode the world... I mean, really. The reason why the black hole we commonly hear about has such gravity as to destroy a planet is that it's an imploded sun. The ones they are making at Geneva have less mass than a spoon. Get it right.
At the risk of being boring and textbooky, bones actually do contain phosphorous - the mineral component of bones is largely hydroxyapatite, otherwise known as calcium phosphate(alveit in a slightly modified form) So yes, you'd get photsphate from the bones, but as you say, also a lot of carbon. We already know the effect carbon has on iron metallurgy (i.e. steel) but as for how phoshorous contributes to strength in a sword... =)Ninja_X said:That is closer to the truth than you know.Doktor Merkwurdigliebe said:Interesting article.
My only thoughts are about the sword article. I think the high quality of the swords he produced is more because of carbon remaining from burning dead tissue, not phosphorus, but I'm no expert on this, I guess someone eventually will prove me wrong.
Well, depending on the tree, you might be violently sick (in which case the chlorophyll will never make it into your system) or drop dead (in which case you don't need the chlorophyll). If you can eat the leaves, then chances are the chlorophyll molecules would be broken down metabolically in your liver, or even initially in the acid in your stomach before they made it to your bloodstream, and even then they might not make it to your eye from the inside, as it were. Topical application (eyedrops) would be the more direct route. And as with most of these things, the relationship between the concentration that you might get from eating leaves and the concentration needed in your eye to give the effect might mean that you had to eat like 20 tons of leaves just to see any difference. =)LilGherkin said:So, what I'm getting is that they're making an eye drop that will let me do this that comes from leaf extract. What happens if I just eat a lot of leaves from a tree?
Regarding the swordsmith, I didn't deny that there is phosphorus in our bones(according to every single yoghurt ad - it is), I just wonder about its use in metallurgy, actually its the first time I hear of such combination.justnotcricket said:Well, depending on the tree, you might be violently sick (in which case the chlorophyll will never make it into your system) or drop dead (in which case you don't need the chlorophyll). If you can eat the leaves, then chances are the chlorophyll molecules would be broken down metabolically in your liver, or even initially in the acid in your stomach before they made it to your bloodstream, and even then they might not make it to your eye from the inside, as it were. Topical application (eyedrops) would be the more direct route. And as with most of these things, the relationship between the concentration that you might get from eating leaves and the concentration needed in your eye to give the effect might mean that you had to eat like 20 tons of leaves just to see any difference. =)
Less mass than a spoon?Silva said:To those who worry about "black hole apocalypse":
CERN is awesome for what they contribute to the world, and they are absolutely right. There is no chance that the black hole made in the hadron collider would explode the world... I mean, really. The reason why the black hole we commonly hear about has such gravity as to destroy a planet is that it's an imploded sun. The ones they are making at Geneva have less mass than a spoon. Get it right.
Now THIS is what scientists should be interested in.008Zulu said:be able to throw fireballs