Science Creates Glass That's Stronger Than Steel

Ghengis John

New member
Dec 16, 2007
2,209
0
0
McMullen said:
Just a few things that were on my mind when the writer of this article dropped a piece of straw on my back.
And just what did that have anything to do with his ignorance? You went on a tirade against religion but where did he indicate any degree of favor for mysticism? I frankly didn't appreciate the downgrading of Pluto because Tombaugh's story was one of triumph in the face of adversity, and because I didn't like the arbitrary manner in which it was done. Since when have scientists determined the truth by a show of hands? That kind of autocracy is something I'd expect out of medieval organized religion. I'd call that mock-worthy yes. If that's where science is headed these days.

Speaking of which, the two are not competing ideologies. Einstein was a man of faith who wanted to understand "the mind of god" and happened to be one of our greatest scientists. You mentioned the medieval Islamic empire and forgot they flourished under the unifying force of their religion. It wasn't until the 12th caliphate was destroyed by the mongols that they fell into ruin, and that had everything to do with the anarchy that that created, not a magical declaration from the mullahs that cast them into the fire. You're just as ignorant and fanatical as the people you bemoan, trying to make this about something it's not like some paranoid who sees the boogie man lurking in every shadow.

That straw only wound up on your back because you were grasping at it.

FieryTrainwreck said:
McMullen said:
[awesome rant]
they read something this brilliant.
Brilliant? Not really. People are always willing to agree to a statement if it's something they want to hear, no matter how unintelligible it may be. We have a broad diversity of news outlets and politicians lined up to prove it. The evangelical atheist is really no better than any other zealot, be his stance religious, political or philosophical. He seeks his crusades in inappropriate places, sees challenges where there are none and lacks the understanding to respect other's points of view. He'll readily advise others to question their viewpoints, or simply criticize them, but takes no time to examine his own. Those who differ are automatically his inferior or are in need of salvation, such is their hypocrisy. If you honestly think the two cannot co-exist then you have made science your religion, and in playing defender of the faith left the realm of reason behind you.
 

EdwardOrchard

New member
Jan 12, 2011
232
0
0
BehattedWanderer said:
Andy Chalk said:
I have no idea what that means and neither do you ...
I beg to differ! As a metallurgical and materials engineer, I know precisely what blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

Dude, shut up.

Go do some science.

Build us a Rapture.
And glass armour.
And swords.

The people demand it.
 

unacomn

New member
Mar 3, 2008
974
0
0
Unless it's cost is relatively as low as steel, or other similar products, it won't be used for mass construction any time soon. Price is the determining factor in construction.

Take transparent concrete for example. It's been around for a few years. Show of hands who's actually seen it in a building.

Also, didn't Palladium almost kill Tony Stark. Good luck selling that one :p
 

fanklok

Legendary Table User
Jul 17, 2009
2,355
0
0
Jordi said:
I'm fairly certain that was made with obsidian or volcanic glass or something else that involves a volcano.
 

Scarim Coral

Jumped the ship
Legacy
Oct 29, 2010
18,157
2
3
Country
UK
I guessing the whole car breaking through a glass screen in a car chase will no longer exist anymore.
 

acrh2

New member
Jan 18, 2011
3
0
0
Did no one pick up, including the author of the news piece, that this "glass" is not transparent?

From the original news article linked from this news piece, it appears that the word "glass" is used in its scientific form (amorphous material), not in its every day use (I can see through it).