Science: Don't Worry, Physics Is Safe

Recommended Videos

Broken Blade

New member
Nov 29, 2007
348
0
0
As always, there's a Portal quote for this.

POTaTOS: "You saved science!"

On a more serious note, once more, someone did the math wrong. Too many great things have been ruined by poor mathematics. Ah well. Back to dreaming of FTL.
 

Hungry Donner

Henchman
Mar 19, 2009
1,369
0
0
I'm not surprised that this was cleared up so quickly, however I am surprised the perp wasn't a wormhole created by hyper-dense Italian cooking. I guess I owe my friends five bucks.
 

Orks da best

New member
Oct 12, 2011
689
0
0
normally i love science, but in this case, i am an excpection.

Curse you science, why do have spit in the face of fun things!!! Unless they only did this so calm peole down... faster the light travel is sill possible!
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,908
0
0
Mimsofthedawg said:
Therumancer said:
draythefingerless said:
Are you seriously telling me they didnt compensate for this in the calculations? :/
Things like viable space travel present threats to terrestrial interests
I just stopped right here.

Because even if this was true and it was the first inkling of baby steps towards FTL or any other sort of interstellar travel, we're still SUPER far off, to the point that these vested interests probably wouldn't care.

If this was true and was the first inkling of baby steps towards FTL, it would be like saying primitive, chinese fireworks from 2000 years ago were the foundation of every modern space program.

A stretch? Yes. completely false? no.

so I just think the rest of your point is moot.

Having said that, I too had a feeling they'd come up with SOME reason... not so much for any conspiracy purposes, but more because science WILL NOT accept a radical notion unless it can ABSOLUTELY BE PROVEN TRUE WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT.

This is a shadow. A very big, dark, cold shadow.
If you didn't read the post then you really have no idea what your even responding to.

That said, the gist of what I was saying is that I have my doubts if these recent revelations over the "mistakes" are accurate. Just as I have my doubts that upon bucking the system and releasing a truely viable electric car that a bunch of the key engineers for "Tesla Motors" just happened to die "accidently" in a plane crash.

In this case we're not talking about something that is a vague foundation for future technologies that haven't even been conceived. The discovery of superlimenal particles had a lot of very obvious meanings and we've already thought of the technologies it's going to lead to. The kinds of interests we're dealing with aren't going to wait until the 11th hour to try and stop something at the last possible second before it can cost them their fortunes and powers, these groups stay in power by ruthlessly dealing with anything they perceive as a threat, preferably in it's infancy before it can pick up that kind of momentum. This is exactly the point where they would have to act to quash/control it if they were ever going to.

In short, I believe they did adjust for these calculations and the original reports were correct, simply because such a basic mistake is very unlikely given the people involved, and the number of people that were looking at this when it was annouced. I think such particles were discovered, but it's being surpessed, and the current revelations are being done to quell public interest since most people are just going to buy it like you are.

See, to me the odds of the people involved having made this kind of a basic mistake, especially more than once given the verifications involved, are just as ridiculous if not more so than the suggestion that existing interests that would be threatened by this would take action.

The thing is that Occam's razor can be double edged in cases like this when both ends of something are equally improbable. While the experts involved having made a mistake seems simpler, when you consider who was involved, the issue, and the level this was at before it was even annouced, this kind of mistake becomes incredibly unlikely. Conspiricy theories are not exactly simple, or likely creatures, but in this case there is enough precedent based on the past, outed, behavior of cartels and big business interests to make it likely that youd see action of that sort here given what is at stake.

In the end we'll doubtlessly have to agree to disagree, but I for one think this is being sat on, will be surpressed, and then whenever the powers that be feel that absolutly need to do so or have wringed out their current options, this will be re-discovered. Much like how some drug companies have been caught sitting on medicines they didn't want to release because there was more money in treating symptoms than causes, just on a bigger scale than those scandals.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,071
0
0
draythefingerless said:
Are you seriously telling me they didnt compensate for this in the calculations? :/
yeah no offense, but that was one of the first principles we learned when covering the speed of light in physics in high school...

sometimes..i feel smart, other times the shit scientists do blows my mind out of the water.

this time, it was the former
 

Silas13013

New member
Mar 31, 2011
106
0
0
Therumancer said:
Mimsofthedawg said:
Therumancer said:
draythefingerless said:
Are you seriously telling me they didnt compensate for this in the calculations? :/
Things like viable space travel present threats to terrestrial interests
I just stopped right here.

Because even if this was true and it was the first inkling of baby steps towards FTL or any other sort of interstellar travel, we're still SUPER far off, to the point that these vested interests probably wouldn't care.

If this was true and was the first inkling of baby steps towards FTL, it would be like saying primitive, chinese fireworks from 2000 years ago were the foundation of every modern space program.

A stretch? Yes. completely false? no.

so I just think the rest of your point is moot.

Having said that, I too had a feeling they'd come up with SOME reason... not so much for any conspiracy purposes, but more because science WILL NOT accept a radical notion unless it can ABSOLUTELY BE PROVEN TRUE WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT.

This is a shadow. A very big, dark, cold shadow.
If you didn't read the post then you really have no idea what your even responding to.

That said, the gist of what I was saying is that I have my doubts if these recent revelations over the "mistakes" are accurate. Just as I have my doubts that upon bucking the system and releasing a truely viable electric car that a bunch of the key engineers for "Tesla Motors" just happened to die "accidently" in a plane crash.

In this case we're not talking about something that is a vague foundation for future technologies that haven't even been conceived. The discovery of superlimenal particles had a lot of very obvious meanings and we've already thought of the technologies it's going to lead to. The kinds of interests we're dealing with aren't going to wait until the 11th hour to try and stop something at the last possible second before it can cost them their fortunes and powers, these groups stay in power by ruthlessly dealing with anything they perceive as a threat, preferably in it's infancy before it can pick up that kind of momentum. This is exactly the point where they would have to act to quash/control it if they were ever going to.

In short, I believe they did adjust for these calculations and the original reports were correct, simply because such a basic mistake is very unlikely given the people involved, and the number of people that were looking at this when it was annouced. I think such particles were discovered, but it's being surpessed, and the current revelations are being done to quell public interest since most people are just going to buy it like you are.

See, to me the odds of the people involved having made this kind of a basic mistake, especially more than once given the verifications involved, are just as ridiculous if not more so than the suggestion that existing interests that would be threatened by this would take action.

The thing is that Occam's razor can be double edged in cases like this when both ends of something are equally improbable. While the experts involved having made a mistake seems simpler, when you consider who was involved, the issue, and the level this was at before it was even annouced, this kind of mistake becomes incredibly unlikely. Conspiricy theories are not exactly simple, or likely creatures, but in this case there is enough precedent based on the past, outed, behavior of cartels and big business interests to make it likely that youd see action of that sort here given what is at stake.

In the end we'll doubtlessly have to agree to disagree, but I for one think this is being sat on, will be surpressed, and then whenever the powers that be feel that absolutly need to do so or have wringed out their current options, this will be re-discovered. Much like how some drug companies have been caught sitting on medicines they didn't want to release because there was more money in treating symptoms than causes, just on a bigger scale than those scandals.
You remind me of this man: http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ldx27uZkuY1qb91qpo1_500.jpg
In other words (if you don't know the meme) it's a guy who claims that human evolution and achievements over the years are due to aliens since we don't know. It's kind of like saying god did it; ignoring all science and logic and coming up with your own wild and illogical conclusions. You quote Occam's razor but ignore that the logical thing is that someone made a mistake, not that millions of testable theories and laws are wrong and the mysterious aliens/government/god is suppressing this information.


I for one am not surprised at all. Anyone with any real physics knowledge, or just general life experience knows this happens often and then gets disproven. A while back, someone claimed to have created cold fusion, ushering in a new era of free energy. The error then was similar to now, one of their measuring instruments was off by a tiny amount and came up with the ridiculous notion of free energy.
 

lumenadducere

New member
May 19, 2008
593
0
0
I figured they'd come up with an actual explanation eventually, but I was still hoping they wouldn't and that they'd actually managed to "break" physics (and by break I don't actually mean break). Kind of a shame that that turned out to not be the case.
 

AngleWyrm

New member
Feb 2, 2009
187
0
0
Earnest Cavalli said:
Meanwhile, the detector in Italy is moving just as fast as the rest of the Earth, and from our perspective it's moving towards the source. This means that the neutrino will have a slightly shorter distance to travel than it would if the experiment were stationary. We stop timing the neutrino when it arrives in Italy, and calculate that it moves at a speed that's comfortably below the speed of light.
So they are saying that the planet moved/rotated while the nutrino was in flight, shortening the distance. This seems like an extraordinary claim to overlooking something. Especially considering the CERN facility has been operating particle accelerators since the 1950s.

The test to prove this particular argument one way or the other is to just point the nutrino gun in the opposite direction, and then time the shot from an equal distance away. If planetary motion is indeed to blame, then there should be an equal but opposite error from the expected time of flight.
 

dmase

New member
Mar 12, 2009
2,117
0
0
I remember reference frames... from physics one. I bet they're going to have new running jokes at cern.
 

vivster

New member
Oct 16, 2010
430
0
0
and they laughed at me for saying that today's science is rock solid
i showed them....
 

McMullen

New member
Mar 9, 2010
1,334
0
0
ph0b0s123 said:
Torrasque said:
jurnag12 said:
For the umpteenth time, they did not release their results as a discovery. They released it as something they were pretty sure was an error. They made their results available so that other scientists could check it and find the error that they were unable to. They said it would be really neat if it wasn't an error, but that it was very likely to be an error and needed to be thoroughly reviewed by the physics community before any revisions to current theory were made.

They did exactly what they were supposed to do.

Suppose that in a math class I stumble upon some mathematical equation that, solved in a certain way, appears to make 1 equal to 2. Suppose I ask the rest of the class to help me figure out what I did wrong. If what just happened with this neutrino thing were repeated in that class, it would mean the Journalism Club members in that class would have started running through the halls proclaiming that I have proved 1 equals 2, the entire school hears about it, and gets all excited. Five minutes later someone points out that I dropped a negative sign during one of my calculations, and the equation goes back to being perfectly mundane. The students in the school accuse me of getting everyone excited and completely ignores the Journalism Club's hyping of my erroneous result and their downplaying of what I really said, which was, again, a request for someone to help me figure out what I did wrong.

If it sounds like a completely ridiculous and implausible situation, that's because it is. Yet, it happened pretty much that way with the neutrino speed measurement. That's how insane people like you are. You turn real life into the kind of trashy sitcom written by people who don't know any other way of creating humor except by making the characters hold the idiot ball and never let go.

People like you are why the phrase "I don't want to live on this planet anymore" exists.
 

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,156
0
0
Well bugger me, and I was just about to spool up the FTL drives, science... it ruins everything.

Does seem odd they didn't compensate for this earlier, then again standing on "firm" ground you rarely think of howmany miles an hour you are actually charging through space.
 

Veldt Falsetto

New member
Dec 26, 2009
1,458
0
0
Let me ask...am I right in thinking, basically, they didn't compensate for the different time zones between Switzerland and Italy or am I missing something?