The goop from the abyss already exits and did so when they made the film. Its designed to deal the with the problems of gasses compressing at high pressure in the bloodstream. When the driver comes back towards the surface, to quickly, the bubbles expand cause extreme agony, organ damage and eventually death. By breathing a liquid that contains the oxygen which you avoid the problems of compression. After saying all that, it is still experimental and after 20 odd years with no real advancement I suspect it will remain so.Rect Pola said:In 20 years, the breathing goop from The Abyss really going to happen?
Addition: The scene with the mouse in the solution? Yeah, that's no trick, that's the actual stuff at work. Pretty impressive for a 1989 film, right?albino boo said:The goop from the abyss already exists and did so when they made the film.Rect Pola said:In 20 years, the breathing goop from The Abyss really going to happen?
Oh.... oh dude.....DVS BSTrD said:I just wish David Carradine could be here to see this.
LCL must have had some type of special agent which would have been able to directly interface with the lungs. The human body can't withstand water in the lungs, because it can't extract the oxygen.Orange Lazarus said:They've invented LCL. We're one step closer to Evangelion's nightmare future.
... you breath liquid for the first nine months or so of your life.vxicepickxv said:LCL must have had some type of special agent which would have been able to directly interface with the lungs. The human body can't withstand water in the lungs, because it can't extract the oxygen.Orange Lazarus said:They've invented LCL. We're one step closer to Evangelion's nightmare future.
In a word? No.Myeth said:And no one cares about the animals they 'used' to find this out?
Well, unless you hold your breath, blood in your veins is going to be oxygen-rich because you've been breathing. It'll be red because it has oxygen in it.Azuaron said:John Funk said:"Some of the most convincing experiments were the early ones," he says. "We drew each other's blood, mixed it in a test tube with the microparticles, and watched blue blood turn immediately red, right before our eyes."Yeah... now I'm confused. I learned in school that vein blood was blue, then in college that it wasn't really and people were just mistaken. I've also given blood to the Red Cross, and they pull that from your veins into a vacuum (so no oxygen addition), and it's definitely not blue.Farther than stars said:Maybe someone can explain this to me. I've never really been good with how the pigmentation of blood works. There isn't any actual "blue" blood, right? Or is it possible to make blood appear blue in an oxygen-free environment?
So I looked it up. [http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/11/is-blood-ever-blue-science-tea/] If by "blue" you mean "darker red", then it sounds like blood can be blue. But if by "blue" you mean, you know, "blue", then no, that's just the vein color.
I don't know what Kheir is talking about. He's either assuming people think de-oxygenated blood is blue and speaking appropriately, totally unclear about the meaning of color, or he dyed the blood.
Or I've been lied to by the internet.
Not...really...no...Myeth said:And no one cares about the animals they 'used' to find this out?