This is great news! Once airships become commercial, we just need to put London on wheels and blow up the planet, and then we'll be in a Mortal Engines-esque world. How awesome is that?
You just cant put enough structure into and airship to make them capable of high speed flight. The fastest modern airship are only capable of 100mph and thats with making the gas bag from Kevlar. That gives a top speed which is 1/5 of the speed of an airliner. Whats the point of building a mode transport thats slower than taking the train? A 747 can carry 500 poeple from London to Sydney in 26 hours, an airship would take 5 days (ignoring things like having refuel and have enough food to feed people for 5 days)solidstatemind said:Dude, being 6'5" and never having found a seat on an airplane outside of the first-class cabin that I can comfortably fit into, I would totally be down with airships. Some innovative company (Virgin, maybe?) should look into a one-off to see what the profit margins look like.
The thing is, I would imagine that properly charted and operated, airships wouldn't be all that much slower. They wouldn't accelerate nearly as fast, but they should be able to reach at least half of the speed or better of jetliners.
Also, think of the land-savings! Instead of miles and miles of runways, you could probably operate a fleet out of the space of maybe 3 football fields!
Did you even read the article?Kevlar Eater said:I like the idea of cargo ships too. What my primary fear about them is:
And that scares the crap out of me.
The use would probably mostly be moving cargo. And after a while perhaps a few air cruises would pop up...albino boo said:You just cant put enough structure into and airship to make them capable of high speed flight. The fastest modern airship are only capable of 100mph and thats with making the gas bag from Kevlar. That gives a top speed which is 1/5 of the speed of an airliner. Whats the point of building a mode transport thats slower than taking the train? A 747 can carry 500 poeple from London to Sydney in 26 hours, an airship would take 5 days (ignoring things like having refuel and have enough food to feed people for 5 days)
Cpt. Red said:The use would probably mostly be moving cargo. And after a while perhaps a few air cruises would pop up...albino boo said:You just cant put enough structure into and airship to make them capable of high speed flight. The fastest modern airship are only capable of 100mph and thats with making the gas bag from Kevlar. That gives a top speed which is 1/5 of the speed of an airliner. Whats the point of building a mode transport thats slower than taking the train? A 747 can carry 500 poeple from London to Sydney in 26 hours, an airship would take 5 days (ignoring things like having refuel and have enough food to feed people for 5 days)
Either that, or James Cameron will make a short movie.Juzari said:So it will explode and crash into an iceberg?MajoraPersona said:The lovechild of the Titanic and the Hindenburg can only be a good thing.
Huzzah! Let us all build our own stylish goggles, and get our steam-powered crossbows ready for the Vinci invasion!TsunamiWombat said:Ladies.
Gentlemen.
We are officially in a Steampunk Alternate universe.
Just look out for the FLYceberg.A Raging Emo said:How about the Flytanic? *Hides*Tales of Golden Sun said:Sounds cool. It's more a ride, like a boat ride, than a plane. We could have the Flying Titanic! (Though the name Titanic will probably scare people)
Heh, soon we might be using Swords in wars for economical reasons!Tom Phoenix said:FINAL FANTASY WAS RIGHT!
I would like to point out that fusion is being seriously considered as a possible power source, and should this happen, more helium could likely be made without too much hassle (if fusion power becomes popular).Avaholic03 said:I was under the impression that we still have a relative Helium shortage. It's not like we're making any more (since the only way to do that is fusion of Hydrogen). What we do "produce" is actually distilled from natural gas, but that's a finite resource. Once it's used, it escapes into space (or at least the upper atmosphere) since it's lighter than the rest of the atmosphere.
That's only true if D-T fusion comes to fruition (as opposed to other fusion fuels, such as Helium-3), and if it's feasible to capture and use the Helium byproduct. Even then, the amount being produced wouldn't be sufficient to sustain a huge fleet of airships.Jaeriko said:I would like to point out that fusion is being seriously considered as a possible power source, and should this happen, more helium could likely be made without too much hassle (if fusion power becomes popular).Avaholic03 said:I was under the impression that we still have a relative Helium shortage. It's not like we're making any more (since the only way to do that is fusion of Hydrogen). What we do "produce" is actually distilled from natural gas, but that's a finite resource. Once it's used, it escapes into space (or at least the upper atmosphere) since it's lighter than the rest of the atmosphere.
See this wiki page for more info and the current state of fusion as a potentional power source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power#Current_status
So very true but only if they re the cool kind of pirates, like in movies and books. As opposed to the douchey kind of pirate i.e. every other kind.Silk_Sk said:fix'd.JohnSmith said:As long as we get sky pirates, this will be unbelievably awesome.