wow, i really fucked that up.Amnestic said:Your grammar is making me cry inside, but did I hear you say that Khadgar isn't in WoW or am I misunderstanding?toapat said:actually WoW isnt in refference to the game, its a refferences to the maps, locations, and charicters in the game, along with the charicters from the storyline. the name is more appropriet as it is not actually a Warcraft game as everyone except Trollbane, Khadgar, and Graymane from the original games are still alive or involved.
Haha. Those movies are classic! You've gotta admit Jeremy Irons is a beast.WanderFreak said:This will go one of two ways.
1. It will be overly simplified and be a new Dungeons and Dragons movie (They should just cast Jeremy Irons now and save the trouble later)
2. It will succumb to Raimi's "Spider-Man 3" syndrome where there are too many characters and plot threads, and no real conclusion as a result.
Either way, aren't there better games to make a movie out of? I mean a movie out of an RPG just seems counterproductive.
DON'T YOU SPEAK HIS VILE NAME HERE, IN A PLACE OF HOPEFUL VIDEOGAME MOVIE.Outofideas said:At least they didn't hire Uwe Boll, right? Right?toapat said:this, the movie can not be good. unless Blizzard approves, it will suckThe_ModeRazor said:A movie.
Out of Warcraft.
*facedesk*
You hit your thirteenth birthday, and realise that World of Warcraft is part of the utterly spectacular Warcraft universe.Velocirapture07 said:Just wondering....How the heck do you make a movie out of an mmorgp???
Yeah, the trailer will probably blow our collective freaking minds.Azmael Silverlance said:Hey this is no spider man you cant pick up 30 comic books and feel the whole world....has he ever played any of the games that Sami guy? :O
I hope blizz knows what they are doing with this cuz if they screw the movie there will be mils of pissed off fans. and then mils of pissed of normal ppl who just went to the cinema cuz of the shiny trailer (oh there will be an uber shiny trailer for sure).
Although considering that the only difference between the story in Warcraft and the story in the World of Warcraft is the distinct lack of constant FMV's makes me wonder why there were face desks at all.Amarok said:Fair enough... it's referred to as a WoW movie in this article though ^^CantFaketheFunk said:As far as I've seen, Blizzard has been very careful thus far to dub it a WC movie, rather than a WoW one.Amarok said:A Warcraft movie doesn't actually sound that bad.The_ModeRazor said:A movie.
Out of Warcraft.
*facedesk*
A World of Warcraft movie however... *bigger facedesk*
Considering that collectively any moderately successful MMORPG is likely carrying within it more backstory and text than the largest book series you've ever read.Velocirapture07 said:Just wondering....How the heck do you make a movie out of an mmorgp???
And because of that people will say it is obviously a fantastic movie. Indeed the movie of the year. Anyone who criticizes it will be accused of "trying to be cool" and it'll spawn sequels that are equally poor but equally popular.rokkolpo said:if this movie ever gets out it'll be viewed by millions and millions of people.(on it's first day)
Aside from the fact that I think the Warcraft franchise has devolved into juvenile mickey mouse fluff, and MMOs being soulless machinations that steal people's lives away, there's the fact that every single movie based upon a video game has so far been absolutely atrocious, combined with the fact that WoW, being an ever ongoing game, has a perpetual and neverending storyline - and a movie based on such a game would be likely to either:Amnestic said:I fail to see the issue. Elaborate.The_ModeRazor said:A movie.
Out of Warcraft.
*facedesk*
Technically Garona's already popped up, admittedly only in the comic series. She and her kid who istoapat said:wow, i really fucked that up.Amnestic said:Your grammar is making me cry inside, but did I hear you say that Khadgar isn't in WoW or am I misunderstanding?toapat said:actually WoW isnt in refference to the game, its a refferences to the maps, locations, and charicters in the game, along with the charicters from the storyline. the name is more appropriet as it is not actually a Warcraft game as everyone except Trollbane, Khadgar, and Graymane from the original games are still alive or involved.
what i mean is of the original characters from Warcraft, only 6 are alive, and one is a ghost who has only one piece left to be involved in, and he wont even make an appearance.
Danath Trollbane, Grenn Graymane, and Khadgar are the last 3 mortal charicters left still involved, although Garona could pop up at any time, and likely will have to in Cataclysm, while the last 3 Immortals are Yersa, Alexstraza, and Nozdormu, as Deathwing is going to die in a year and a half
I fail to see how elaborating on past story is a bad thing, especially if it's done well.Byers said:1) Have very little to do with the original property, based on some of the same characters and but largely abandoning the "canon" in favor of different storylines.
2) Be a recap of events that the majority of the target audience has already experienced.
3) Or be a continuation or further development of the latest game storylines, with a completely different look and art style, indirectly forcing further development into the game to either recognize this direction as actual lore or disregard it altogether, ultimately making the movie(s) feel like something that's pointless and shouldn't exist.
Not so. They could have it set entirely in their CG style which they've been using for Haruhi knows how many years now.Byers said:It's also the fact that WoW has a cartoony art style that a real action movie would have to abandon to not look ridiculous, and is thus liable to share very few recognizable traits with the original property even without taking story or script into consideration.
Elaborate, yes. Agreeable, no.Byers said:Hope that was elaborate enough for you.