Blablahb said:
If you attack someone already in a fight, it kind of makes sense that they'll hit you. That is called self-defense. Bringing a weapon with the sole intent of committing assault however is never ever self-defense, no matter how you look at it.
You have to get this foolish idea of Jones running in and attacking this group of people out of your head. It's like you didn't even watch the video in question. He ran in between the brawl and shouted at everyone to stop fighting. Then HE was attacked for it. In which case he pepper sprayed them. SELF DEFENSE. It's not like he ran in an punched someone in the teeth, then pepper sprayed them.
Blablahb said:
Actually, even if I was just a bystander and not being attacked myself, I would move to disarm someone displaying a weapon whenever possible. And they'd better not raise it at me while I'm doing it.
So what you're saying is if you were a bystander in this situation and a guy went to:
1.Break up a fight with a crowd of drunken club goers, then
2.Gets attacked by some of them, and
3.Pepper sprays the attackers in SELF DEFENSE,
you would move to disarm him? That's assault. You just got involved in a situation just like you're demonizing Phoenix Jones for doing, but in your case, you're just attacking him. Because that makes sense.
Blablahb said:
Beating someone to keep them from using a weapon that could lead to you getting hurt or killed is never assault. If he hadn't attacked me, I wouldn't have fought back. If he hadn't brought a weapon, I would never go all out.
HE DIDN'T ATTACK ANYONE. Get that through your skull. Watch the video. It's clear as day that he just ran in and the first thing he says is, "get me 911". That's not what people who go for an attack generally do.
Blablahb said:
No, he joined in the fight and when he got what he had coming he acted like a little *****. Breaking up a fight involves de-escalation. Ussually by targeting the ringleaders, grabbing a hold of them and separating them firmly without giving them a chance to attack either you or others.
Watch the video again. I hardly call yelling, "hey break it up" joining a fight.
Blablahb said:
For this you'd typically start by leading them away, and using a armlock type of hold if it doesn't work, preferably one that doesn't involve joint manipulation, not untill the others fail anyway. In an extreme case where the violence is out of control you could choke someone out and lay them aside untill they wake up, remembering to keep anyone attacking them while unconcious off them. That's for instance a usefull tactic when dealing with people on drugs that render them unsensitive to pain.
Yep, because the techniques you described would work when surrounded by A GROUP OF DRUNK PEOPLE. Derp. I'll assume by now that you've gone back to actually watch the video. He gets attack just for showing up. Imagine what would've happened of he armlocked one out of the 8-10 people there. He probably would've been jumped instantly.
Blablahb said:
If there's multiple attackers, holds don't work. Use punches to the nose and jaw and kicks to the groin while positioning yourself well, or throw them into objects. Avoid being surrounded, always pick on one and strike with maximum violence untill he is incapacitated, then pick your next target, never throw half a punch at all of them at the same time
Don't try to tutor me on how to stop a situation with multiple people. You've probably never done this yourself, and even if you have probably not in the same situation as the one in question. You're probably not even qualified to be handing me instructions on how to stop 8-10 drunk people.
Blablahb said:
Actually I've been peppersprayed before. And I think it's perfectly possible to incapacitate an attacker, providing you have grabbed a hold of them before they use it. Which is why you go apeshit at them the moment you see the weapon, and you *never* wait for them to use it.
Have you been pepper sprayed while shitfaced? Doubt it. And I doubt you'd be able to incapacitate anyone while pepper sprayed, as well as being drunk. Especially a guy in body armour who knows self defense. Goooood luck.
Blablahb said:
The problem is you can't place techniques using sight anymore, so it would involve some serious brutality. Whatever the case, it is essential to keep attacking them untill they are unconcious or thoroughly uncapacitated by pain. If you let them back off after one or two strikes, they recover faster than you regain your eyesight, and you die. Then again, your attacker agreed to any degree of injury when he pulled out his pepperspray, so no need to feel guilty.
Good luck incapacitating a guy who knows martials arts and is wearing body armour, while drunk and peppersprayed.
You're talking half out of your ass and half analyzing a situation you've never been in. And what you're arguing really isn't my point. My point is that what he did was not wrong. Legally he's clear and the Seattle Police are most likely going to have to drop charges.
You keep going on about him running in with a weapon. He's going into a group of 8-10 drunk people. If he didn't show that he had some sort of protection, he would've been jumped instantly.
A police officer would have done the exact same thing.