He's not really famous at all, just a news oddity that's cropped up in the past few weeks.Pilkingtube said:This is the first time i've heard of this guy, is he famous in the USA or just Seattle?
Yeah, give him unlimited access to firearms. Great idea. I think I'll take my chances with a guy in a mask carrying around mace and punching people.boradis said:2) Join a larger organization of trained and well-equipped specialists who are given authority by society to capture and hold dangerous persons. This is called "joining the police."
Mr. Jones, unless you can swing the former, please switch to the latter.
If I remember something like that already exists in the US and they are called bounty hunters but as for other places such as europe I don't think it's legal.boradis said:2) Join a larger organization of trained and well-equipped specialists who are given authority by society to capture and hold dangerous persons. This is called "joining the police."
That isn't actually so. The point of a man wearing a costume is he has the ability to do what they cannot. The system is designed to protect the innocent, but occasionally, the system also has to let bad people go. Making the system more draconian isn't really an option, because then more innocent people get caught in it than already are. The state just gets all pissy when other people do the job "they" say only "they" are allowed to do. If he hasn't hurt anyone innocent though, I don't see a harm. The second someone gets killed, they are no longer a costumed vigilante, they are in fact a costumed criminal, maybe even a super villain. It's also debatable how "proper" those law enforcement agencies really are.thaluikhain said:If he wanted to fight crime, could he not have joined the police, or other law enforcement agency, and, you know, do things properly?
Have you ever seen how unpredictably violent cops can be? There are some countries around the world that employ on a private basis, security for it's people. This is no different than me volunteering for a Community Watch. Only, they do it a bit flashier. And so far, he is only non violent, something the police arent. Also, it's his choice to do these things if he so wishes, even at great personal risk, he is allowed to do them because his body is his right.boradis said:If you've ever seen "Cops" (and who hasn't) you know how unpredictable violent criminals can be.
This is entirely true, and that's pretty undeniable.Scrumpmonkey said:Perhaps these people don't realise just how silly they look? want to help your city? Volunteer to work with the homless, donate and help staff a soup kitchen or any number of community projects that help tackle the casues of why there is crime. Train as a councilor or become qualified to volenteer your time doing social work. These are not flashy, people do them every day week in and week out, but they do more good than showing off in a silly costume to people.
I don't think their actions deter crime or really inspire people, want to fight crime? Join the police. They are more functional than you think and their processes stop you and others from being put in unncessary danger. I find him little more than adnagerous fantasist.
Best case scenario is Batman.Scarim Coral said:So where does Shadow Hare fit into this that is if anyone still remember him. I don't blame the RLSH want to stop Phoenix Jones aggressive action since the worse case scenario is in that scene in Kick Ass.
Regardless on either side despite how some people think they are weirdo for dressing up I genuine believe that they do it for a good cause. (I read that their cause had affected people for the better.)
Right, but there's "vigilante justice outside the law" and there's "masked hero vigilante justice outside the law," and we're currently talking about the latter which, to my knowledge, has not resulted in any deaths to date.thaluikhain said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_George_TillerAzuaron said:but what happens when a vigilante decides to crack down on software piracy? Or if a vigilante decides that non-crimes (in American society), like cheating on your spouse, deserve "justice".
That sort of thing has been going on for ages.
Hell, why not class "corrective rape" and harassment of inter-racial couples under that while we're at it?
But removing the system designed to protect the innocent altogether (in his case) isn't going to result in more innocents being affected?Baresark said:That isn't actually so. The point of a man wearing a costume is he has the ability to do what they cannot. The system is designed to protect the innocent, but occasionally, the system also has to let bad people go. Making the system more draconian isn't really an option, because then more innocent people get caught in it than already are.
Ok, yes, but I doubt the US is adaquately fucked enough to justify moving law enforcement away from law enforcement agencies.Baresark said:It's also debatable how "proper" those law enforcement agencies really are.
Well...I don't see a clear difference. They'd all firmly believe themselves to be heroes.Azuaron said:Right, but there's "vigilante justice outside the law" and there's "masked hero vigilante justice outside the law," and we're currently talking about the latter which, to my knowledge, has not resulted in any deaths to date.