Your not removing the system by any means. And no one has been hurt by this. There is an existent system where if you see someone in distress you are allowed to help them. Part of that is calling the police of course, but this guy is just subduing them in a non-lethal manner. He isn't punishing them, it doesn't state specifically but I would imagine the police are brought after he subdues them. Also, unless I know a police officer, which is mostly not the case, I am trusting my safety to "a random in a suit". I police are fine if they happen to be there, and if they are not, you have to be allowed to help yourself and your neighbors if you can. Until this guy commits murder, he is not doing anyone any harm, and he is well within his rights to use his person to do such a thing.thaluikhain said:But removing the system designed to protect the innocent altogether (in his case) isn't going to result in more innocents being affected?Baresark said:That isn't actually so. The point of a man wearing a costume is he has the ability to do what they cannot. The system is designed to protect the innocent, but occasionally, the system also has to let bad people go. Making the system more draconian isn't really an option, because then more innocent people get caught in it than already are.
If you can trust some random in a suit with doing things the system currently doesn't allow, why can't you trust the police force, people who are trained and with a system of accountability with being able to do them?
thaluikhain said:Ok, yes, but I doubt the US is adaquately fucked enough to justify moving law enforcement away from law enforcement agencies.Baresark said:It's also debatable how "proper" those law enforcement agencies really are.
That is a situation that all face, including law enforcement. The police get themselves and others killed all the time. And it's not just them and criminals. there are situations where the police themselves cause the injury or death of an innocent person. They are not even really held accountable for that either. There was a situation where Detroit SRT shot and killed a 4 year old girl. Another situation where a cop beat a deaf guy when the man simply tried showing him ID and explaining that he was deaf. Stuff like that is common place. In the situation where someone is harming the person or property of someone else, something bad is going to happen. He is simply not sitting by and letting it happen. That makes him more community oriented than most, I'm not afraid to say.BobDobolina said:RLSH seem to understand that this kind of real-life vigilantism can range from nuisance to disaster, and to know that what they're doing is more about hobbyism and charity. Can't fault his courage, but Phoenix Jones is pretty likely to eventually wind up getting someone killed.
What do you mean? That's pretty original... can you name any other birds with an Order of Chivalry?tehfeen said:I think Knight Owl should come up with a more original name.
Because what Jones is doing is not only dangerous to himself, but to those around him. Its very easy for someone to see his costume and think that its the RLSH. What happens if one of these criminals that Jones chases off sees the RLSH members doing something and decides to attack them. Then you have a several people in the hospital because they wear costumes while doing charity work.XxRyanxX said:..Wow, I felt that was pretty harsh considering that Jones is risking his life for the community. I admit that feeding the homeless and doing good deeds is very nice, but I agree with Jones personally- why put on a costume then if you're not going to fight crime? Personally I also felt that this part of the Article is important too:Nevertheless, he felt that it didn't reflect well on the superhero community, and that Jones was something of a thorn in the RLSH's side.
He's aware of the dangers, and admitted that he has been shot/stabbed in the past. This type of situations seems off to me really, because why would the RLSH be concenred with Jones (or anyone) being seriously injured or killed? It's like they are holding back spite being in a costume which usually, like the movie Kick A** (sorry my moral is not to ever cuss) where you dress up so people don't know your identity when dealing with crime.Jones was critical of the RLSH, saying that although its members did good work, there was no point in putting on a superhero costume if you weren't going to fight crime.
Still, I appreciate them both I just can't understand the ideal of what RLSH is trying to do. I've helped with the Toy Drive, feed homeless, and so much without a costume but if I were going to go head on with a bunch of criminals or put myself in danger, then yeah I would wear a costume if I wasn't a cop. Plus, that's another thing- Jones is trained and knows what he is doing. Not anyone can just dress up and fight, they have to know weaponry, and combat period. Just my opinion overall but I am indeed grateful to them both.
I'm also aware that Jones can be sued if he does anything lethal, but surely I have faith that he'll do the right thing and handle the moment well. Just got to keep informed about this and we should be all good. Which is to say - I am surprised we have real Superheros in the first place, besides people in careers or movies. I find that really astonishing and awesome.
While you make some pretty darn good points, I still have to disagree. Write down Knight Owl and Night Owl, go on. Done? Cool, written down Knight Owl is a pretty cool name, but it's one of those names he's going to have to explain to everyone one he meets 'Oh, you're Night Owl, like from Watchmen?' 'No, I'm Knight Owl, like an Owl who's a. um Knight' Not cool.Jamash said:What do you mean? That's pretty original... can you name any other birds with an Order of Chivalry?tehfeen said:I think Knight Owl should come up with a more original name.
I think his full, proper title is 'Knight Commander Sir Barney Owl KBE' but he uses Knight Owl as shorthand.
Night Owl would have been unoriginal, because most Owls are nocturnal (so it's redundant), but Knight Owl... an Owl with a bit of class and a title, that's pretty cool.
I wonder if he's part of a group of titled birds... perhaps he has a sidekick called 'Commander Chicken CBE'.
You're right, it's is pretty lame, but I bet he thought he was being really clever when he came up with it.tehfeen said:While you make some pretty darn good points, I still have to disagree. Write down Knight Owl and Night Owl, go on. Done? Cool, written down Knight Owl is a pretty cool name, but it's one of those names he's going to have to explain to everyone one he meets 'Oh, you're Night Owl, like from Watchmen?' 'No, I'm Knight Owl, like an Owl who's a. um Knight' Not cool.Jamash said:What do you mean? That's pretty original... can you name any other birds with an Order of Chivalry?tehfeen said:I think Knight Owl should come up with a more original name.
I think his full, proper title is 'Knight Commander Sir Barney Owl KBE' but he uses Knight Owl as shorthand.
Night Owl would have been unoriginal, because most Owls are nocturnal (so it's redundant), but Knight Owl... an Owl with a bit of class and a title, that's pretty cool.
I wonder if he's part of a group of titled birds... perhaps he has a sidekick called 'Commander Chicken CBE'.
As for other birds having an order of chivalry, you've got me stumped. Though I think that eagles are generally thought of as the most noble and majestic of our avian friends, appearing as they do on lots of different coinage and heraldry. Also falcons have an entire profession named after them, that has always had strong ties to the nobility. Lastly, I'm pretty sure several carrier pigeons have been awarded medals/honors for services during wartime in the past, not a code of chivalry sure, but come on, war hero pigeons!
Hope that explains my opinion on his name. Because Knight Owl sucks.
I agree with you in all senses. Also...It must be said that this is a new level of cool. I mean...maybe we'll eventually have a "Superhero" department in law enforcement. That'd be sweet.Fasckira said:So hes something of a Wolverine now? Epic!
Seriously though Im pretty sure Jones is well aware of the dangers yet hes still taking the risk to help others. I applaud the guy in all his efforts. The RLSH is also doing something noble, dont get me wrong, but I still think Jones is doing the most impact here.
No. I am referring to the actual police.ChicagoTed said:If I remember something like that already exists in the US and they are called bounty hunters but as for other places such as europe I don't think it's legal.boradis said:2) Join a larger organization of trained and well-equipped specialists who are given authority by society to capture and hold dangerous persons. This is called "joining the police."