Simpsons Porn Parody Induces Vomiting
- Thread starter Tom Goldman
- Start date
Look when you get into "being faithfull to the source material" with porn, your just wierd. Its porn, dont hate it because its not in line with the freaking source material. Hate this porn because its gross looking and yellow people is a REALLY out there fetish that personally actually makes my junk shrink
Woah woah woah woah...there's a Justice League one!?
The Simpson's trailer didn't seem that bad. Isn't that the porn standard? If that's below average than I'm now a bit more seriously interested in the Justice League one.
The Simpson's trailer didn't seem that bad. Isn't that the porn standard? If that's below average than I'm now a bit more seriously interested in the Justice League one.
But i have to say that their retro Batman parody is damn close to the original.And VERY funny too. Cut out the sex-scenes and you have a better parody than all those scary/fantastic/whatever-movie pieces of crap have been.ninja51 said:
Well Marge herself said she usually brings her "A Game" to the bedroom so it could be quite distur.... I mean interesting. Then again self-praise is never worth much.
I wonder if they'll roll out the old McBain line "I feel like holding another meeting; in bed"
I wonder if they'll roll out the old McBain line "I feel like holding another meeting; in bed"
Yours are all valid points, however, there have been more than a few of these over the past few years. Hell the Mario one was in the 80s I think. Here's the thing: nothing's happened. The fat cats can't have missed it since it's all over youtube and the rest of the tubes, so either they don't care or there's nothing they can do about it.Fumbleumble said:
If that were actually the movie they wouldn't show it here. If you happen to be THE WORST PERSON ALIVE and you actually PAY CASH MONEY for this, then you get to see the porn part. This is just the trailer.wildpeaks said:Oh, the mental image... Kill it with fire !thiosk said:
Also, how is that even remotely porn ? They're just painted yellowish, keep their clothes on and do.. well nothing (and no one). Am I too old fashioned ?
No, they've just caught up with 30 years of Rule 34 [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rule%2034].Tom Goldman said:
Or they've succumbed to the Hollywood thing of just using existing properties and making a hash-job of it.
Rule 35 [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rule%2035].Rpground said:
I just have a hard time (oo-er) seeing why this isn't copyright infringement..... I'd be curious how far an 'amature' would get when doing stuff like this... People have been sued into oblivion for far less.. and there have been cases built on far sketchier evidence.JdaS said:
End of the video has the url to the real site for it and you can see a more.... "hardcore" trailer and other "extras"Swaki said:well i think its because the trailer dont want to give away to much, something Hollywood should learn, and there might be a more graphic trailer but i doubt the escapist would link to that, kinda curious if they are painted all over and have dyed all the hair.wildpeaks said:Oh, the mental image... Kill it with fire !thiosk said:
Also, how is that even remotely porn ? They're just painted yellowish, keep their clothes on and do.. well nothing (and no one). Am I too old fashioned ?