Wow. What a brilliantly succinct and sadly accurate way to sum that up. Very nicely done.samaritan.squirrel said:Because it's the conclusion organic intelligence tends to arrive at after a few years.Ekonk said:Why does everyone always assume Artificial Intelligences will think 'Wahey, I think, therefor I am! LET'S FRY SOME MOTHERFUCKING HUMANS'
A problem that can be solved by just using the Roadrunner instead of building a gimped version out of a tiny research budget.Andy Chalk said:The computer uses 147,456 processors and 144 terabytes of memory, yet still thinks about 100 times slower than a real cat.
No shit, you should copyright that quote quick, because if you don't I willSusan Arendt said:Wow. What a brilliantly succinct and sadly accurate way to sum that up. Very nicely done.samaritan.squirrel said:Because it's the conclusion organic intelligence tends to arrive at after a few years.Ekonk said:Why does everyone always assume Artificial Intelligences will think 'Wahey, I think, therefor I am! LET'S FRY SOME MOTHERFUCKING HUMANS'
I am totally ripping that off the next time this argument comes up.
I don't know about that first line, I mean, I bought a grey tabby, and within 2 weeks it had built a bigger, smarter cat. That new one tried to build a better one, but I had to end it and kill them both, can't let those f--king cats get too smart.Noelveiga said:Yes, because cats have done a great job at self-improvement so far.MagnetoHydroDynamics said:I am a trans-humanist and this has made my day!
One step closer to a real AI.
What do you do with a real AI?
Make it do house chores? No
Make it treat the sick? No
Make it go to war? No
You make it improve itself! Boom! Tech-Singularity!
Anyway, yes, it is very exciting news. If they have simulated an entire animal brain and they get diferring results from what you'd expect on a cat that is very useful information. How much autonomous learning and memorization the rest of the nervous system can perform is something neurology itself is currently trying to determine. The numbers, by the way, are staggering at this point. Back in the day I read some scientist postulate that a human brain could use up maybe 4 terabites of memory. Aparently he was undershooting it by a whole lot. I realize this thing isn't an artificial brain but a brain emulator, but still...