Yet no one complains that Hawkeye isnt in the box too, they are minor characters in comparision to the big 4/5 if you count the villain.
Whilst I get the point, I don't think this is the best example. Electric cars have been restricted in the US exactly because of wanting to make more money out of petrol-fueled cars. I think if anything, this example proves how their lust for squeezing as much money as possible actually backfired on them, and confirms their narrow mindedness due to the want for financial gain.Zachary Amaranth said:We just had a major automotive failure in this country in part because the automotive industry decided to hell with new ideas, let's push large, expensive gas guzzlers in a bad economy and amidst high gas prices!
And now they're pushing to pass laws restricting sales of electric cars (look at Tesla). I know the automotive industry isn't exactly the toy industry, but the whole "companies love money more than X" isn't always enough to break their mentality.
Actually, from the looks of things, it's quite frequently not enough.
While I like the name, I'm not willing to shell out the cash sooo...Desert Punk said:Introducing: "Kids Say!"
"Have an issue you want brought to public attention, are you too annoying or not influential enough to have people care about your issue? Dont worry, we at Kids Say will have one of our talented child actors pretend to care about your issue, and make a heart felt youtube video guaranteed to make headlines or your money back!"
The name and tagline will only cost you 99.99 USD.
Kids, in general, don't really care what gender characters are as long as they are awesome.seydaman said:Hm. Fair point, none of the siblings I live with engage in such toys anymore, so I'm rather in the dark, but it seems to me there's no reason to not move to a general 50/50 gender split in toys. Although not in the realm of toys, Avatar (The Last Airbender), while still a childrens show, had damn near a hard 50/50 split on gender, and every kid I know seems to adore the show, seeming to imply that there's not even a loss in money either.
This made me chuckle, so I shall re-post it for all. Thank you.Zachary Amaranth said:Why do you think he hasn't turned back into Banner?If anyone should be pissed about inequality in toys it's the giant green rage monsters.
He's very good at writing team dynamics, but otherwise he's nothing particularly special.Zachary Amaranth said:It's the public's fault for taking him and raising him up as some sort of supa feminist icon.Daria.Morgendorffer said:Ah, yes, Joss Whedon lamenting the poor, downtrodden women.
Joss Whedon can bite me for his fucking crocodile tears for women.
Companies will almost always use old ideas until they make negative money before attempting new ideas. It's part of the reason the U.S. has such absurd copyright laws: Companies just want to use the same properties and ideas forever. If you want something new you basically have to have a new company do it or legally end their ability to do what they've been doing.Zachary Amaranth said:Companies like to play conservative and are not always welcoming of new ideas. The fact that developers need to fight to just to get female focus group reps should indicate something's wrong here.Terramax said:Companies like to stereotype. But they like to make money more.