In the words of Piccolo from DBZ Kai Abridged: "Nobody watched Dragon Ball."Kamille Bidan said:Let's be honest. Pretty much every DBZ character that wasn't Goku or Gohan (and even Goku, technically. See the head-injury incident) is someone who was bad and then turned good.RJ 17 said:To be fair, I do get where you're coming from, but my comparison was really on a general level. Vegeta was a bad guy that turns good, just like Hawkeye. Granted, Hawkeye was a good guy before he became a bad guy that became a good guy again, still, that's what my comparison was based on.
Beyond that, Hawkeye was far more useful than Tien and/or Yamacha could ever hope to be.
Ah, yes. I still HATE pink, because as a little girl I was told that I like it.Charli said:I avoided that section too...and it was supposed to be FOR me. Honestly it IS kinda sad. I used to collect power rangers, transformers and have them ride my little ponies. I was all inclusive baby.Saltyk said:I remember growing up, I would avoid the girl's toy section at all costs. All that pink couldn't be healthy for a boy, right?
Some variance of colour wouldn't go amiss, and the idea that 'girls are attracted to pink or pastel' is only as ingrained as society believes that 'that's the way it is'.
Girls are attracted to all sorts of colours, it's just that pink has been delegated to girls and boys are made to feel as though they must avoid it (for some *cough* asinine reason)...
Waste of a good colour. And honestly I'm not it's biggest fan either but... still.
What's wrong with female toys? Why can't boys play with female characters?Hosker said:So a toy is only female friendly if it's of a female? What's wrong with the male toys?
To be fair: Maybe they didn't get the actress' approval for the face sculpt, or they didn't want to deal with the approval process. Christian Bale's "John Connor" figure is covered up with goggles and a face mask.an annoyed writer said:I actually agree in part with the kid, for one reason: see my avatar? It's of Quorra, from Tron Legacy, as portrayed by Olivia Wilde. Now during the release of Tron Legacy, they made a bunch of figures of the characters, her included. Unfortunately, there is only one figure in the entire line that portrays her, and it commits a rather grievous crime: it does not portray her face. The figure is only available with a helmeted head, and because of that people have had to kit-bash figures to give her a proper face, with various degrees of success.
Why doe that piss me off? Well, anyone that has seen Tron Legacy knows that Quorra is considered one of the lead characters. The other leads got Helmeted and helmetless sculpts, while she is the only lead character produced without a proper face sculpt, even though she spends the majority of the film helmetless. Why? probably because marketing.
Thank for proving my point twice over. Did you look at the prices? Its bad enough that women are in short supply on the shelves, but you have to deal with the secondary market and their mark-ups!Lightknight said:Aww, that's sad, the parents don't let their kids browse amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/Marvel-Select-Exclusive-Action-Figure/dp/B005OZOF52
That's the first action figure I found with a very basic google search.
Now, what wouldn't be fair would be to force stores with limited shelf space to carry a product that is less popular than any of the other products that could fit in that space. Capitalism, yo.
Regarding the pink ranger comment, amazon to the rescue! http://www.amazon.com/Power-Ranger-Samurai-Action-Figure/dp/B004H0MBPQ
This whole thread could have stopped at: "Six-year-old upset"
I hate that whole "I fixed that for you" bit, but...I fixed that for you.CriticKitten said:There is already an Avengers toy line. There is already a Black Widow action figure. This girl and her parents are complaining that a toy doesn't exist even though it clearly does. That shows that they are not even customers of the toy line to begin with.
So their opinions hold no weight whatsoever.
This would be like a non-gamer complaining about a lack of games that feature alchemy and cute girls, or sumi-e wolves.
Dude, she's the cheapest one.BarelyAudible said:Thank for proving my point twice over. Did you look at the prices? Its bad enough that women are in short supply on the shelves, but you have to deal with the secondary market and their mark-ups!Lightknight said:Aww, that's sad, the parents don't let their kids browse amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/Marvel-Select-Exclusive-Action-Figure/dp/B005OZOF52
That's the first action figure I found with a very basic google search.
Now, what wouldn't be fair would be to force stores with limited shelf space to carry a product that is less popular than any of the other products that could fit in that space. Capitalism, yo.
Regarding the pink ranger comment, amazon to the rescue! http://www.amazon.com/Power-Ranger-Samurai-Action-Figure/dp/B004H0MBPQ
This whole thread could have stopped at: "Six-year-old upset"
Capta: comfort zone
Maybe if marketers got out of their comfort zone, we wouldn't have to deal with that.
Oh, I can certainly understand a girl's frustration over there not being enough good female superheros. That is entirely a valid complaint. I'll say that the demand isn't currently there, but the demand also isn't there because of a lack of good female characters. Same as in video games. A vicious self eating snake.BarelyAudible said:Guess I'm getting frustrated because this reminds me of the "You got Samus and Lara! Isn't that good enough!" blarg.
I disagree, what they should be teaching her is research. Because what the internet doesn't need is more people who don't bother to fact check.Mink68 said:The parents are teaching her well ... parents are doing a great job