No, people who like Skyrim were too busy posting about how they took an arrow to the knee.jacobythehedgehog said:Probably because people who have Skyrim are playing Skyrim, people who have Zelda just want the world to know how good it is.
No, people who like Skyrim were too busy posting about how they took an arrow to the knee.jacobythehedgehog said:Probably because people who have Skyrim are playing Skyrim, people who have Zelda just want the world to know how good it is.
Nail meets head.SecretNegative said:Who cares really? Why should I care? Who should anyone care?
So what you're saying is, no Nintendo game should ever get game of the year, regardless of critical reception or popularity? = \SidingWithTheEnemy said:Well, I don't really care.
But I still post.
Because I think that a game that has to be valid as Game of the year has to run on a majority of the systems. Not just WII or PS3 exclusive. If a game can't bother to be ported to the other systems it's not worth being named game of the year.
You might call it PC Game of the year or Wii Game of the year but anything else is just ridiculously senseless in my opinion. Feel free to disagree but that's my personal prequisite.
Well yes, exactly.geK0 said:[...]
I would completely agree with this....erttheking said:The results are in, Skyward Sword has beaten Skyrim. And speaking as someone who has not bought a Wii game in a year since getting an xbox 360, I have one thing to say. "Good job." Rattle on about how unoriginal Nintendo is, but in reality Skyrim is part of a long running series too, and if more people liked Skyward Sword instead of Skyrim, then they won fair and square. It was close anyway, 51% to 49%. Well played Nintendo, I may have left you but I can see that you presence over the decades has not faltered. Let's see if you can take it all the way, Assassin's creed is all that stands between them and the title of Game of the Year.
P.S. Skyrim has a bunch of problems anyway, it's fun VERY fun, but far from perfection. Don't get me wrong though I still give it a double thumbs up.
Fair enough.SidingWithTheEnemy said:Well yes, exactly.geK0 said:[...]
It can be "Nintendo's Game of the year" but not the game of the year.
Or we stop all this commerical bullsh*t and start making only plattform relevant awards. Because if I never going to experience Skyward Sword (because the Wii just isn't my type of console) I can never support Skyward Sword as "best" Game of the year.
I personally disagree. There has rarely been a moment in which the controls didn't exactly do what I wanted it to. Aside from the occasional centering, it worked very well. Sure it wasn't always perfect, but I have not yet played a single WM+ game that did motion controls as well as Skyward Sword.Agayek said:If Skyward Sword's controls weren't utter ass. The motion control is garbage and uncomfortable, and not nearly as precise as it should be. I can see what they were going for, and it's an admirable attempt, but it still falls short.