RoBi3.0 said:
I feel that this is a oddly specific scenario. So mush so that it is probably in reference to something. Can someone please explain the inside joke to me.
It's in reference to a series of threads a couple years back (I think, could be more or less) that involved you having the choice of saving one thing or another from a whirlpool. I think they were fairly harmless for a while but then one thread Specifically in the case of whether or not someone would save their pet, or a complete stranger.
Answers mostly consisted of people:
Finding a loophole so they don't have to properly answer the question
Loving their pet and saving them
Valuing a random human over their pet
Raging at the people who saved the pet
Losing faith in humanity over a contrived moral dilemma
It was fun. I tried to search up the thread for you, but I think it might not exist anymore. Oddly enough, I look back on it now as if it was a silly little argument between friends (at least, compared to the more recent shitstorm).
The reason a lot of people (myself included) have joke answers and/or completely avoided the question is because we know of the dangers these threads present. Pretty sure the OP is fully aware as well since he picked three of the most fantastically toxic topics from recent years and combined them into one.
It was a test from the OP (probably just a joke actually, but let's go with test since it's more fun), and judging from the fairly tame responses in this thread, I think we passed.
Edit: Forgot another popular answer! Some people said they'd save their pet, not just because they love them, but also because maybe the stranger is a rapist/killer/pedophile!