So do you believe in ghosts? Why?

Recommended Videos

DestinyDriven

New member
Jun 30, 2011
81
0
0
Yes I seriously do. I have had so many weird things happen ever since I was a kid, I can't help but believe. I am also a witch (although, I class myself as a novice). Some people don't believe in witches, but they exist. It just means you practice witchcraft. So, yes I am into lots of things like crystals, divination etc. Actually, my forte is probably to do with spirits and entities, since I am clairsentient. I can feel energy.

I wouldn't be surprised if people thought I was stark raving mad right now lol.
 

Stikibunn

New member
Apr 27, 2009
103
0
0
DeadlyYellow said:
Thespian said:
DeadlyYellow said:
I'm more akin to the theory of a psionic imprint over spirits of the deceased.
Please do elaborate. I'd be pretty interested in exactly what you mean by this.
Residual energy left by heightened bio-electrolytic pulses. Causes resonance when exposed to an energy source.
You're missing one crucial piece here too. These residual traces of bio-electricity are not merely recordings but a kind of copy of the neurological pattern at the time of death.

The thing about ghosts is they are a thing that by it's nature cannot be fully proved. Ghosts leave little or no concrete evidence. One can only just barely record or measure one.

I am talking here as probably the closest thing this thread has to an expert as I actually AM a "Ghost Hunter" (although this term is crude and not exactly accurate) affiliated with a society which does regular ghost hunts in various sites.
I myself am partially sceptical as to the actual existence of ghosts. I simply hunt to try and convince myself that my "Imaginary Friend" as a child was the real person she claimed to be.
I could simply be mad but I loved her dearly and miss her even if she was all in my imagination.... but there is a possibility that she might've been a factual person (Which considering as I've found her obituary is very creepy)

There are a few "Facts" that I will now point out. These are not facts in the complete 100% scientific sense. I'm not gonna spout any science I know nothing about.

1: Ghosts are almost universal and bear the same traits almost everywhere.
2: 99% of ghost sightings and investigations do find no evidence at all or find stuff that can be thrown away as nonsense.
3: Ghost sightings seem to decrease as time goes by. Neolithic sites for example have very little to offer a paranormal investigatory team. Some sites that we've investgated have seen a decrease in activity as the site becomes abandoned for longer. It seems that ghosts fade away after a period of time.....

And here's where the main question I've seen in the thread is answered. The question being "With all the people that have died even if only 1% of people become ghosts then why are there still so few?" the reason is of course because whatever residual energy that allows a spirit to manifest must degrade over time. Being a ghost doesn't mean the afterlife, if you're aware at all (And the parapsychological community is split on that subject) then you'd just become less and less "alive"

And Sorry if you decide to call shenanigans. It's just what I have seen and experienced myself. I am biased of course but I'm open to the possibility that I'm wrong.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,405
0
0
Yes. I do believe there is some spiritual phenomena that is not being able to be explained by science. if we would have though science can explain everything we would still think earth is flat.

However i also believe that 99,9% of all claims are actually either attention seeking or lack of knowledge. I have seen places rigged to make sounds that appear to be from nowhere and mechanisms to make lamps move at certain hours.

1: Ghosts are almost universal and bear the same traits almost everywhere.
Not true. While ghost as a person after death concept is universal (so is UFO so there you go) the actualy ghosts are different. for example in japan ALL ghosts are that of a woman, due to fact that the fear of woman ghost originated form their mythos, while in western its more often man than woman. also the "shadow people" are a western phenomenon. middle east and africa cannot be much looked at due to their belief in magic and other stuff their witchdoctor tells them about or isolationism.
 

kouriichi

New member
Sep 5, 2010
2,414
0
0
Elcarsh said:
kouriichi said:
xD being a biochemist doesnt give you any knowledge of spacetime though.
You have a firm understanding of the biology.
But in contrast, you try to base everything in my belief as false, because the human aur.... Bioelectricmagnetic fields die out with the human.

But what if they dont just end in spacetime? What if they continue on? What if their sheer presence in the spacetime continuum causes them to extend indefinitely?
As of this moment, we dont know half as much as we would like to about it. ((Scientific community as a whole))
Right now, most of the information about it is made up of theories! We dont even know how many dimensions our universe is actually made up of! xD We know at least 4, but we dont know how many past that! They could be areas where fields and energy resonate.

Its a belief. Based on theories. And as i said, it would have to be a traumatic event that causes the field to change. Yes, there have been many traumatic events in history, but isnt it possible not all would have the proper L-field to create a ripple? Like a radio frequency needed to be heard on a radio. Only the proper frequency come through loud and clear.

This is what science is! xD questioning what we dont know, in hopes that some day we will have an answer. I know im not RIGHT. And im glad. It gives people to strive for something that is.
No, what you're doing isn't science, it's just making shit up to justify your preexisting beliefs. Science is a rigorous process where every single claim must be supported. Your claims are based on no evidence whatsoever, you just pull them out of your arse.
"Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe."
This is a testable explanation, and a prediction. This IS by definition, Science.
If i had billions of dollars, the greatest minds on the planet, and a lab with equiptment, i would happily test it. But i have none of those.

All its a belief. A theory at best. ((though i dont like to call it a theory, because ive never had the will to have it investigated.))

Whats your explanation for ghosts then? xD Lets see you give a better reason for all the spiritual sightings ever. And it cant be, "everyone was fooled, insane, or had a defect that causes them to imagine things." Because thats 100% more unlikely then them being something we cant explain.
 

kouriichi

New member
Sep 5, 2010
2,414
0
0
Elcarsh said:
kouriichi said:
"Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe."
This is a testable explanation, and a prediction. This IS by definition, Science.
So, how do we realibly test it? And what predictions can be made that invariably turn out to be accurate?

kouriichi said:
If i had billions of dollars, the greatest minds on the planet, and a lab with equiptment, i would happily test it. But i have none of those.
Luckily, for you, there are people who do, and not a single shred of evidence of anything supernatural has ever been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Not one. Coincidence? Bad luck?

Or how about the around 25 major monetary prices offered to anyone who can prove the existence of any such phenomenon in the entire world? Guess what, not a single one has been claimed so far.

kouriichi said:
Whats your explanation for ghosts then?
Which phenomenon do you want an explanation for? It's typical for silly people who believe in ghosts to assume that all phenomena that are attributed to them are in fact the exact same thing. What makes you blindly assume that someone seeing a weird shadow is caused by the exact same thing as someone hearing a creak in an old wooden house?

If you want those things treated as being caused by the same phenomenon, you better damn well be ready to prove that they, in fact, are, which you haven't.

kouriichi said:
Lets see you give a better reason for all the spiritual sightings ever.
What, a better explanation than "a wiz...I mean, a ghost did it!"? Oh yes, that'll be a real ball-buster for sure!

kouriichi said:
And it cant be, "everyone was fooled, insane, or had a defect that causes them to imagine things."
What, so you believe in ghosts but you don't believe in hallucinations? There are seven billion people on earth, is it that fucking odd that a few measly percent of those see or hear weird shit in a lifetime of some 70-80 years? Are you seriously trying to claim that people don't imagine things, make shit up or simply find patterns in random occurrences, something that the human brain has been proven to do?

You are grasping for straws, now.

kouriichi said:
Because thats 100% more unlikely then them being something we cant explain.
So now it's something we can't explain? Well, if we can't explain it, how the hell do you know it has anything to do with anything supernatural? You are, in essence, saying "We can't explain it, therefore we can explain it!".

If we can't explain it, then you are in no position whatsoever to make up an explanation, because we don't have an explanation! Just because there is something we don't know, it doesn't mean you can fill in the blanks with whatever fairytale most appeals to you (to paraphrase Dara O'Briain).
xD
Wait wait wait.
Where did i ever say my explanation was the right one?

And people have been, "Filling in the blanks" since man walked the earth.
Im allowed to fill in the blanks however i like! Just like anyone else.

Your filling in the blank. "Everyone whos seen something weird is just imagining things."
Ive never seen ghosts. I dont know anyone who has. Ive never personally had a paranormal event. But that doesnt mean i cant believe there isnt an explanation.
(And sighting a Comedian doesnt exact make me any less credible xD) If you want to quote people, how about, "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they dont refer to reality" (To paraphrase Einstein.)
 

Tentickles

New member
Oct 24, 2010
311
0
0
Wow a lot of people quoted me and took my 3 sentences + a word and shoved, no bulldozed words into my mouth...

I have no idea how most of you took what I said and well... yeah...

I literally meant what I said: Some things can not be explained by science.
I wasnt exclusively talking about ghosts. Notice that 's' in there after thing.

and I am not ashamed to say I am superstitious. I err on the side of caution. If believing there are monsters in the dark that can kill me; will save me from harm, then I shall.

For there are monsters in the dark...

(Bad people, to specify those who are gonna take that sentence LITERALLY.)

Which is why I carry a very sharp pocket knife wherever I go.
 

Voidrunner

New member
Feb 26, 2011
689
0
0
I guess I do believe a spirit can hang around for a short period at least, my grandfather never got to see my sister born before he died and I'm told right after he died he appeared to see her before disappearing for good. I'm not sure about long term ghosts though, my mother claims a young boy once appeared in the kitchen looking for his mother before vanishing and once my father tried to get help from a policeman who also just disappeared plus the time he claimed he saw the ghost a soldier wandering around the old army barracks.

I've never seen anything myself though so I've got no idea what to believe.
 

martin's a madman

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,319
0
0
TheDarkEricDraven said:
I don't just believe, they are just another fact of life for me. I consider them as another person would consider spiders.
A fact can't just be 'for you'.


OT: I treat ghosts like gods, there's no evidence that even remotely suggests their existence, and as such, I won't believe in them until (and unless) the believers can adequately prove that they exist.

I doubt that will happen, ghosts seem to just be another off-shoot of dualism which has encountered pretty much damning issues.
 

martin's a madman

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,319
0
0
TheDarkEricDraven said:
martin said:
TheDarkEricDraven said:
I don't just believe, they are just another fact of life for me. I consider them as another person would consider spiders.
A fact can't just be 'for you'.
Thats nitpicking, you know what I mean.
It's not nitpicking, you do 'just believe' no matter how strongly you believe it to be true, it's just a belief of yours.