kouriichi said:
"Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe."
This is a testable explanation, and a prediction. This IS by definition, Science.
So, how do we realibly test it? And what predictions can be made that invariably turn out to be accurate?
kouriichi said:
If i had billions of dollars, the greatest minds on the planet, and a lab with equiptment, i would happily test it. But i have none of those.
Luckily, for you, there are people who do, and not a single shred of evidence of anything supernatural has ever been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Not one. Coincidence? Bad luck?
Or how about the around 25 major monetary prices offered to anyone who can prove the existence of any such phenomenon in the entire world? Guess what, not a single one has been claimed so far.
kouriichi said:
Whats your explanation for ghosts then?
Which phenomenon do you want an explanation for? It's typical for silly people who believe in ghosts to assume that all phenomena that are attributed to them are in fact the exact same thing. What makes you blindly assume that someone seeing a weird shadow is caused by the exact same thing as someone hearing a creak in an old wooden house?
If you want those things treated as being caused by the same phenomenon, you better damn well be ready to prove that they, in fact, are, which you haven't.
kouriichi said:
Lets see you give a better reason for all the spiritual sightings ever.
What, a better explanation than "a wiz...I mean, a ghost did it!"? Oh yes, that'll be a real ball-buster for sure!
kouriichi said:
And it cant be, "everyone was fooled, insane, or had a defect that causes them to imagine things."
What, so you believe in ghosts but you don't believe in hallucinations? There are seven billion people on earth, is it that fucking odd that a few measly percent of those see or hear weird shit in a lifetime of some 70-80 years? Are you seriously trying to claim that people don't imagine things, make shit up or simply find patterns in random occurrences, something that the human brain has been proven to do?
You are grasping for straws, now.
kouriichi said:
Because thats 100% more unlikely then them being something we cant explain.
So now it's something we can't explain? Well, if we can't explain it, how the hell do you know it has anything to do with anything supernatural? You are, in essence, saying "We can't explain it, therefore we can explain it!".
If we can't explain it, then you are in no position whatsoever to make up an explanation, because we don't have an explanation! Just because there is something we don't know, it doesn't mean you can fill in the blanks with whatever fairytale most appeals to you (to paraphrase Dara O'Briain).