Isnt it funny how IGN are trying to defend EA when EA bribes IGN to give their game better reviews
Yeah, I find it dumbfounding that EA's shares were awesome-high in 2007-08, around the time I like them when they were releasing new IPs, inexpensive content-filled infrequent expansion packs and a finite number of respectable sequels; and drops continually when they contracted sequel-itis and started gouging its consumers banks accounts during a global depression.Dexter111 said:snip
![]()
snip
If they wanted to "better themselves" and be more attractive to consumers and get some good PR for once, they could always trim down all the fat to keep development costs lower and maybe save some money from those $100 million marketing campaigns to give them on to their customers.
They somewhat tried some of that in ~2007-08 by introducing a lot of new IP and trying to cut down on the gouging, but rather soon turned around to more of it.
Whenever they are somewhat getting into monetary trouble they aren't looking for a fault in their business models but with the customer, surely by charging more, gouging with microtransactions and offer more cut out DLC to buy at Launch, as well as producing ever more sequels and shortening the development cycle to a year or two tops they're going to fix that right up.
Haha that's exactly the thing with EA. It's not that (for instance) Valve is inherently better re: goals (make an obscene amount of money) and methods (digital distribution w/ included DRM), it's that they choose not to actively antagonize customers and release obviously terrible products. EA doesn't just suck at making games - they suck as a business.Bvenged said:Yeah, I find it dumbfounding that EA's shares were awesome-high in 2007-08, around the time I like them when they were releasing new IPs and expansion packs and proper sequels; and drops continually when they contracted sequel-itis and started gouging its consumers banks accounts during a global depression.
Because it's being run by shareholders and investors who know fuck-all about videogames and it's audience. That's not the case with companies like Valve and CDProjekt. They're ran by people who are actually part of the target audience for their product, or at least are passionate about the medium of videogames.FelixG said:you would think that "Hey, lets not antagonize our customers!" would be a fairly straight forward concept... But for EA it apparently is not..
You got it mate there we go fixed because unlike EA I listen to people and their issues and try to fix themCrono1973 said:I hate when people misuse the spoiler tag.
Hint: Don't use the spoiler tag to hide an article that is the main point of your damn thread. If it's the main point of your thread, why hide it?
Also, some people use it to hide entire quoted posts or even YouTube videos that don't contain spoilers.
As for the article, I hate when people act like anything goes because a business is supposed to make money. That's where I stopped reading the "spoiler".
Wow, that's really cool of you. Thanks.malakaira said:You got it mate there we go fixed because unlike EA I listen to people and their issues and try to fix themCrono1973 said:I hate when people misuse the spoiler tag.
Hint: Don't use the spoiler tag to hide an article that is the main point of your damn thread. If it's the main point of your thread, why hide it?
Also, some people use it to hide entire quoted posts or even YouTube videos that don't contain spoilers.
As for the article, I hate when people act like anything goes because a business is supposed to make money. That's where I stopped reading the "spoiler".