Sony to PS3 Detractors: Go Sell Razor Blades

Woe Is You

New member
Jul 5, 2008
1,444
0
0
Indigo_Dingo said:
I know that the torch of unrealistic requirements has been passed from Crysis to a new game called Zeno Clash, a game with, of all things, cavemen, dinosaurs and fish guns.
Where the hell are you getting this from? Zeno Clash is using the Source engine (you know, the same engine HL2 is using) and its developers [http://forums.aceteam.cl/index.php?showtopic=126] have said that they don't want very high system requirements.

And this is why the information you provide is usually spotty at best.

Oh, and there's a huge likeliness GT5 won't be a 2009 release. [http://uk.ps3.ign.com/articles/891/891903p1.html]
 

Simriel

The Count of Monte Cristo
Dec 22, 2008
2,485
0
0
Indigo_Dingo said:
Simriel said:
Doug said:
Simriel said:
Doug said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
Difference is I'm reflecting reality and you're being an idiot.
....you realise you're talking about games, right? How can you assume that your own personal tastes match every single person's on earth?
Because this is Indigo. He makes many good posts, and i agree with him regularly. But when it comes to the PS3 HIS AND ONLY HIS TASTES MATTER!
Agreed. I respect him quite alot of the time, but that goes out the window when he claims reality itself will form around his opinions.
It rather annoys me to be honest. I mean less than a day ago i saw him give some amazing advice to a guy in need of help. It was pretty much what i had been thinking. And i have seen such posts by him before. He is an excellent member of the community. Unless he starts to discuss the PS3.
Until you realise I might be talking with the exact same perspective and level-headed attitude, and the problem might be in your perception.
You have stated that the Xbox has no good titles. That is not level headed.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Mazty said:
oliveira8 said:
No its not fucking retarded, maybe you like to scour the internet in search of every game that is being released. Well I dont. I only notice most of games when someone makes a big deal out of them, or people show them to me. I do keep track of my favourite series (namely Blizzard and Valve) I dont need to know theres hundreds of games being released cause I probably wont play them or give a shit about it. I discovered many games just by hearing people talk about them. Cause you know why? Cause probably I am to busy playing games/study/hanging out to care about what is going on the gaming scene. And I have been gaming for over 14 years now.
If you don't keep touch of other console games, then how did you knwo which console to buy to begin with??
I dont have a console TA-DAM!

If I want a console I'll take time to research what console I'll want to buy.
 

level250geek

New member
Jan 8, 2009
184
0
0
oliveira8 said:
level250geek said:
By following this thread I've learned three things:

1. PS3 Fanboys really are that bad.
My best friend owns a PS3 and he absolutely, positively refuses to acknowledge any flaws the console/the software library has. If anybody says anything other than "The PS3 is the greatest gaming console--nay, the greatest piece of technology--known to man and it has games that are so good all other games should just shrivel up and die" he's on them like a rabid wolf on a stuck pig. I thought he was unique. I was wrong. I'll make fun of the Red Ring of Death all day long. I'll listen to other people make fun of it. The 360 is my system of choice but it's not perfect. No piece of technology is. That's what happens when you're not a fanboy: you can acknowledge weaknesses.

2. Nobody wants their feelings hurt.
Because forum posters have to preface everything they say with "In my opinion," and conclude it with "...but I could be wrong." Also, one must fully acknowledge the primacy of an object in question and admit they simply refuse to acknowledge said object's primacy, lest anyone be accused of thinking something is better.

3. I don't want a PS3.
The PS3 has many good games, exclusive or otherwise, but from where I'm standing when you stack up the offerings on both consoles--both retail and online--the 360 edges out. Just because something is inferior doesn't mean it's bad. However, the PS3 is not worth its price tag because of its software library. If the price went down, I might get one, but now I won't even it dropped down to $50 with a $250 rebate: I don't want to be a fanboy or thought to be fanboy.

Thank you and good night.
Whatever he said. I still say that PS3 vs Xbox 360 discussions are pathetic when Nitendo Wii has already won and is spending all the Wii money on booze and whores.
The arguments are ultimately trivial and pathetic, but face it: this is what fans do. Are you yourself a sports fan, or do you at least know many? They will argue until they die about how great their team is, how all the other teams suck, and how anybody who disagrees just doesn't know sports. It's typical. The really dedicated ones will ignore any facet of reality at all and stand firmly behind their team's primacy no matter what the actual performance is: that is a fanboy. There is a distinction in my mind. A fan is dedicated, enthusiastic, and stubborn; but they are willing to face reality when reality is shoved in their face. A fanboy lives in their own little world kept nice and tidy by their delusions. They refuse to admit weakness and defend the indefensible.

Remember back when Sony changed their ToS to state that any player-created content made with their games, from Guitar Hero: World Tour to LittleBigPlanet, is property not of the gamer who made it, but Sony? Remember that?

That same best friend I was speaking of: I told him about it and told him I thought it was a rip-off. His response: "Well, you are using their games to make the content with." I told him it was like Microsoft saying that any documents you create with Word belong to them, not you. His response was "Well I'm surprised they don't say that."

You see what I mean?

The 360 is not without its fanboys and the Wii doesn't even need them, but I have to say: from my experience the PS3 fanboys take the cake.

Anyway, as oliveira8 said: these arguments are pathetic. They are what we do, but they are pathetic. I'll try to actually pull away from this one. I think. Maybe.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Indigo_Dingo said:
oliveira8 said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
oliveira8 said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
oliveira8 said:
Onmi said:
oliveira8 said:
Onmi said:
oliveira8 said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
oliveira8 said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
oliveira8 said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
oliveira8 said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
oliveira8 said:
Neosage said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
Onmi said:
Neosage said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
Neosage said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
Neosage said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
Neosage said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
Neosage said:
wot i liek s3d!
Mass Effect 2 is a multiplat.
Alan Wake has yet to show gameplay footgae. That would be fine, but its been talked about for 4 years. Vapourware?
Cry on=http://au.xbox360.ign.com/articles/941/941071p1.html
APB is only PC - if there's a 360 version there will be a Ps3 version.
Splinter Cell COnviction is 2010 at the earliest (and never if the world is lucky)

Final Fantasy Versus XIII is 2010.
You're missing Afrika and Eyepet
Yakuza 3 won't be seeing the west til 2010 at the very earliest.
Well Mass Effect isn't coming out on PS3
What are you basing that on?
The fact the first didn't come out on PS3 and this: [link]http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-news/4783.html[/link] besides I think they would at least make Mass Effect for the PS3 first and that isn't going to happen as of what I have heard. Unless you have some brand new exciting news on a surprise announcement from Bioware?
No new news, just old news that you keep forgetting - EA confirmed the game is going multiplatform.
If you will show me the evidence that Mass Effect 2 is definatley coming out on the PS3?
I don't - you just have to give a reliable source that its not, and until then we go with the more likely idea, that EA are in fact doing what they said and it is going multiplatform.
What? That is like saying if there is no evidence to not support me baking a cookie, you just assume I will because the people who make the cookie tins confirm that I might make some chocolate muffins.
I got a link from Kotaku

http://kotaku.com/5145813/mass-effect-2-coming-in-2010-will-be-multiplatform

There is no SPECIFICS it will be PS3 or just 360 and PC,but it still opens up the option for debate.

Regardless the original point being debated (will Mass Effect 2 be Multi-Platform) is confirmed as Yes, because it is definitly coming out on the PC.
The fact that they specified that it will be multiplatform specifically when the first was on the said platforms and never specified as such raises a few questions.
Fair point, although this is EA we are talking about aside from the fact they don't actually make the game and it would be interesting to see why Bioware haven't mention the fabled ps3 release. At all. Ever.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.98981

Aparently no Mass Effect 2 for the PS3.
I'm failing to see the words "No ps3 ever" there.
Dont you see the "Mass Effect 2 will be released for both platforms at the same time." and no PS3 in the entire article.

If Bioware is not releasing for the PS3 at the same time as the Xbox 360 and PC doesnt really mean that the PS3 will never see ME2..just means that the PS3 might see ME2 with a shaddy port.
Either way its a moot point for the purposes here. This leaves us with the 360's games for 2009 having....nothing interesting. Exactly like I said.
Well maybe the 360 doesnt have any good 2009 exclusives and maybe they will have who knows, maybe Microsoft is going to announce their 2009 killer game for Christmas time...or maybe they wont. Either way if 2009 exclusives are interesting or not depends on the persons point of view. The same goes for the PS3 exclusives.
No. There's really no genre that the Ps3 doesn't deliver on extremely well with its 2009 line-up, while here's no genre that the 360 actually delivers something valid or interesting on.
No. There's really no genre that the Xbox 360 doesn't deliver on extremely well with its 2009 line-up, while there's no genre that the Ps3 actually delivers something valid or interesting on.

C wut I did ther?
Difference is I'm reflecting reality and you're being an idiot.

Fine, you want me to prove it?

JRPG - White Knight Chronicles

Action RPG - Demon Souls

FPS - Killzone 2

TPS - Quantum Theory

Action Adventure - Uncharted 2

Hack and Slash - God Of War III

Open World - inFAMOUS

Racer - Gran Turismo 5

Casual - Eyepet, Afrika

Online Multiplayer - MAG

Mystery - Heavy Rain

Holy-shit-everyone-must-play-this-including-you - Trico
So I am an idiot cause I dont think that the PS3 2009 exclusives are the greatest thing ever to happen in gaming history?

Srsly dude, you sometimes make good threads and posts but when someone touches the PS3 and PS3 exclusives you just start spitting flames of hatred...

Tbh I start to think you are a Sony employee or Sonys President himself...
No you're an idiot because you made a statement and won't back up your point. Back it up and all claims of 'idiot' will be retracted. How diverse is the 2009 release? and by Diverse we mean gaming Genres
I didnt even made that post with seriousness. Hell I just did it to make a point. That someone that likes X console will enjoy their exclusives as much as the Y console owner will enjoy his Y console exclusives.

I can do the same with the Wii

No. There's really no genre that the Wii doesn't deliver on extremely well with its 2009 line-up, while there's no genre that the Ps3/Xbox 360 actually delivers something valid or interesting on.

How hard is to get if you like the console you have you will enjoy the games that will come out for the said console. WHile you wont give a shit about the other console exclusives. And if you all 3 good for you!

The thing is that Indigo is making the 2009 PS3 exclusives something made by God himself while the 360 are made by peasants.

((By the way MAYBE! one of the reasons that Gundam game is only being released for the Japanese is cause MS thinks that its were its going to sell more and help boosting the sales in Japan. But yeah pretty stupid to release a game in Japan only.))
Yes but Indigo backed UP his statement, the fact is you just have thrown out TWO that haven't been backed up, in my view that makes you an idiot (if you were serious about it)no matter who you are, didn't you notice me along with everyone else ask Indigo about the ME 2 article?

I don't care who you are, back up your points or just pipe down.

And they won't release operation troy in english because Bandai-Namco has a FUCK YOU clause for other countries stating if they ever make a game WORTH playing and buying it will NOT be released in english.
Urg god urg...third time I have to explain this...AGAIN I WILL EXPLAIN THIS TIME IN CAPS!

SEE PS3OWNER LIKES HIS PS3 SO HE LIKES THE EXCLUSIVES THAT ARE COMING OUT FOR THE CONSOLE! WHILE THERES OTHER PEOPLE THAT DONT OWN A PS3, AND ARENT REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO THE PS3 EXCLUSIVES INDEPENDENT IF THEY AWESOME OR NOT.

Now I'll do for a Xbox 360 user.


SEE XBOX360OWNER LIKES HIS XBOX360 SO HE LIKES THE EXCLUSIVES THAT ARE COMING OUT FOR THE CONSOLE! WHILE THERES OTHER PEOPLE THAT DONT OWN A XBOX360, AND ARENT REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO THE XBOX360 EXCLUSIVES INDEPENDENT IF THEY AWESOME OR NOT.

Now the Wii

SEE WIIOWNER LIKES HIS WII SO HE LIKES THE EXCLUSIVES THAT ARE COMING OUT FOR THE CONSOLE! WHILE THERES OTHER PEOPLE THAT DONT OWN A WII, AND ARENT REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO THE WII EXCLUSIVES INDEPENDENT IF THEY AWESOME OR NOT.

All I'am saying is that if the PS3 or Xbox 360 or Wii has the best 2009 exclusive line up it depends on the persons opinion over those games. Not cause somedude says it.

PS:Dude you called me an idiot!! I'm so going to put a dead cat in your mailbox and a camel in you bathtub! THEN WE SHALL SEE WHO IS THE IDIOT!

PS2: Yes I know you have all 3 consoles that just means you have more games to look for. :D
No. Fucking no. It. Does. Not. Work. Like. That. Console preferences don't define game desire, they are defined by them. I don't rabidly want God Of War III because I bought a Ps3, I bought a Ps3 because I rabidly want God of War III. That is how it works. I want Trico because Team Ico make fucking awesome and incredibly moving games, not because its a Ps3 exclusive. I want inFamous because its a great concept that looks immaculately done. I want Heavy Rain because it sounds like the end result of what everyone who wanted freedom of choice in gaming asked for.
See I didnt even know that Trico was being made by Team ICO...cause you know why? I dont own a console namely the PS3! If you have X console you will be aware of what games it will come out for your console. You buy PS3 cause of God of War 3 fine cool. After you end GoW3 you see what other games are coming for the PS3 and not for the Xbox 360 or Wii cause you really dont care. Unless you have money to buy another console.
Thats just fucking retarded. I keep abreast of what is happening on all platforms. I don't restrict myself. I know that Microsoft are publishing a survival horror game from the company who made Max Payne called Alan Wake, that focuses on using light as a weapon to illuminate against shadow enemies. I know that the torch of unrealistic requirements has been passed from Crysis to a new game called Zeno Clash, a game with, of all things, cavemen, dinosaurs and fish guns. I know that Fable III has been accidentally confirmed by a man with one of the most annoying speech impediments I have ever heard. I know that the next Splinter Cell is (supposedly) a 360 exclusive. I keep aware of things that are happening in gaming.
No its not fucking retarded, maybe you like to scour the internet in search of every game that is being released. Well I dont. I only notice most of games when someone makes a big deal out of them, or people show them to me. I do keep track of my favourite series (namely Blizzard and Valve) I dont need to know theres hundreds of games being released cause I probably wont play them or give a shit about it. I discovered many games just by hearing people talk about them. Cause you know why? Cause probably I am to busy playing games/study/hanging out to care about what is going on the gaming scene. And I have been gaming for over 14 years now.
10 minutes a day. That is how long I spend looking at gaming news. This includes reading Hyper and Kotaku.
See you take time to read those websites or magazines. While you probably take time reading gaming news I take time to read music/movie/series/proper news.

See I might know every movie/album that is coming out this year and you dont.
 

Simriel

The Count of Monte Cristo
Dec 22, 2008
2,485
0
0
Mazty said:
Simriel said:
You know what? I think Ocarina of Time is shit! I have played it and i did NOT enjoy it. Put that in your PS3 and smoke it!
Well why is is sh*t?
A game may not cater to your preference, but it hardly makes it a bad game. I hate platforming arcade games like Ratchet and Clank, reguardless though it still is a great game as it does what it is meant to for that genre. I could hate FPS', but that doesn't instantly make the sh*t, just means I, as all humans do, have preferences.
Somehting like Ocarina of Time did exactly what it should have done for that genre and more, therefore it is a good game.
Ah you see i never said it WAS shit. I said i THINK it is shit. Difference. I am well aware that it is regarded as a good game. And it most likely is. But i never enjoyed a minute of it.
 

The-Big-D

New member
Feb 4, 2008
411
0
0
The PS3 isnt worth the price. I would only ever consider it in a few years when it goes down in price and the game list is alot beter.

Maybe if it was a little lower and was actually worth the money i might have considered buying one. It was a good concept on paper but when it was made it really wasnt that appealing. Sony made a huge loss last year in sales and the whole idea just went downhill from there.

Who really cares that the PS3 has a Blu-Ray player, personally i couldnt care less.
The price for the console itself is too much.

As for the lineup of games the exclusives arnt really anything to get excited over.
I could probably think of maybe 2 or 3 games i would actually want to get one the PS3.
Lack of games, they spend too much manafacturing the console, they are making a loss on the console anyway and there pumping there funds into advertising so really there just losing money from the PS3 and dont really have anything to gain. There losing more than they are actually getting back.

They bought it out at a bad time and didnt think it through. I think il stick with the trusty PS2. Good console, reliable and a good selection of games.

Also as well online play is free on the PS3. surely they are making a loss on that too. I mean the XBL subscription fee is there to keep it running and obviously gain money from it. The wii isnt so bad as they are racking in the cash. But Sony just handing out online play for free isnt really doing them any favours.

Its why i ended up buying a 360. I felt like i got something better and more of a bargain for my money.
 

Woe Is You

New member
Jul 5, 2008
1,444
0
0
Indigo_Dingo said:
Woe Is You said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
I know that the torch of unrealistic requirements has been passed from Crysis to a new game called Zeno Clash, a game with, of all things, cavemen, dinosaurs and fish guns.
Where the hell are you getting this from? Zeno Clash is using the Source engine (you know, the same engine HL2 is using) and its developers [http://forums.aceteam.cl/index.php?showtopic=126] have said that they don't want very high system requirements.

And this is why the information you provide is usually spotty at best.
From the April 2009 Hyper Magazine draped across my lap, page 18.
"Don't expect to play Zeno Clash on any old computer, either: just because you could happily run Crysis on Medium-low settings a year ago doesn't automatically mean you can play Zeno clash on any display setting in the world today."
I'd believe it if they weren't using one of the lightest modern FPS engines around and if the game looked more technically advanced than Crysis. I have no idea where the hell they're getting that from.

But anyhow, from your listed games, there's a huge likelihood that GT5 won't be a 2009 release [http://uk.ps3.ign.com/articles/891/891903p1.html].
 

Abolyss

New member
Mar 18, 2009
12
0
0
I'd like to point out to people who think the Ps3 doesn't break that there has been a huge amount of complaints (id think nearly reaching the red ring level) stating their Ps3 lasers are burning out (nearly all the time out of warranty...coincidence? :p) and that includes my girlfriends Ps3 which burnt out last week (out of warranty. The only reason this isnt all over the place is cause Sony has denied it outright without even saying "yea we will take a look",

they don't care!

I wouldn't call myself a fanboy of the 360, but from a consumer point of view the 360 is a much better option for a lot of reasons!
 

Simriel

The Count of Monte Cristo
Dec 22, 2008
2,485
0
0
Indigo_Dingo said:
Simriel said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
Simriel said:
Doug said:
Simriel said:
Doug said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
Difference is I'm reflecting reality and you're being an idiot.
....you realise you're talking about games, right? How can you assume that your own personal tastes match every single person's on earth?
Because this is Indigo. He makes many good posts, and i agree with him regularly. But when it comes to the PS3 HIS AND ONLY HIS TASTES MATTER!
Agreed. I respect him quite alot of the time, but that goes out the window when he claims reality itself will form around his opinions.
It rather annoys me to be honest. I mean less than a day ago i saw him give some amazing advice to a guy in need of help. It was pretty much what i had been thinking. And i have seen such posts by him before. He is an excellent member of the community. Unless he starts to discuss the PS3.
Until you realise I might be talking with the exact same perspective and level-headed attitude, and the problem might be in your perception.
You have stated that the Xbox has no good titles. That is not level headed.
This is what we call mockery. It is where you take something the person has aaid and apply it further to make them look ridiculous. It is often used by The Daily Show and The Colbert Report.
Apologies. I assumed you meant it seriously. Can you accept that there is not any game available for the PS3 that appeals to me enough to own one? and that in my opinion the Xbox does have titles that i wish to own it for?
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
level250geek said:
oliveira8 said:
That same best friend I was speaking of: I told him about it and told him I thought it was a rip-off. His response: "Well, you are using their games to make the content with." I told him it was like Microsoft saying that any documents you create with Word belong to them, not you. His response was "Well I'm surprised they don't say that."
Just pictured an Angry Microsoft suit bursting into my room and demanding all my Microsoft Word files I ever did.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Onmi said:
level250geek said:
You see what I mean?

The 360 is not without its fanboys and the Wii doesn't even need them, but I have to say: from my experience the PS3 fanboys take the cake.

Anyway, as oliveira8 said: these arguments are pathetic. They are what we do, but they are pathetic. I'll try to actually pull away from this one. I think. Maybe.
Coming from the King of Pathetic arguments thats laughable.

And PS3 Fanboys may be the ones who do the defending more, but which Fanboys ***** constantly about a game not coming out on their platform?

Let's see... MGS4, WKC, VC, oh the 360 boys! That's right, the annoying bastards who cry and whine that the games they want aren't coming out for the White Doll.

Also a cookie to who gets the White Doll reference.
Wait wait! Is level250 geek the King of Pathetic arguments or me? Cause if it is me...I'll have to stuff a second dead cat in your mailbox!