Faith in humanity........lowering......Sinclose said:I think Lulzsec once mentioned they do this 'for entertainment'. Not to prove a point or anything, they're doing this for fun.Jumplion said:That's the thing, Sony isn't the one who is paying here; it's the consumers. If they really wanted to make a clear-cut point, they wouldn't have (allegedly) stolen people's information and would have either A) targeted the higher ups, B) warn Sony what they could potentially do with the info, or maybe the nicest (I.E. least likely) option C) contact Sony directly and work with them to improve security.will1182 said:There are still people here defending Sony. Seriously?
Don't get me wrong, the hackers are idiots, but Sony deserves this. It really does. It's a shame innocent people have to pay for their incompetence.
Sony may deserve this, but the consumers don't. They even have the audacity to demand money from the very people they are stealing with. Either way, the consumers are being buttfucked by two bullies.
And people will pay them too. If you read around their Twitter feed, they have many defenders who actually couldn't care less how much data is compromised, as long as they get a good show out of the whole thing.
It's disgusting.
Logically, if it was better protected, the hackers would say so, because that would mean they were skilled enough to hack past the security on no budget.mojodamm said:Proof? The mouths of hackers spill proof nowadays, interesting.
I agree most people that aren't into hackking might not understand how simple a sql hack is, this would be a major fuckup for any site with a user database.danpascooch said:An SQL injection? Seriously? A fucking SQL injection!?
That's the simplest type of hack in the world, if hacking were burglary, that would be the equivalent of checking if the front door was unlocked. Basically Sony left its front door open after being robbed blind just weeks ago, WHAT. THE. FUCK.
Don't even tell me none of this is Sony's fault, that's bullshit, I've always known it was bullshit, but now there's proof.
actually, most people use the same password everywhere, so most of the username/passwords could be used to get their email and from there you can get a lot of information.Korey Von Doom said:In all fairness to Sony, why encrypt what someone wouldn't really want, I mean seriously this is more a, look we stole pretty much useless data, we're so bad.
This doesn't suck for Sony nearly as much as it sucks for the 1,000,000+ people who were just opened up to identity theft.Tubez said:To all the people that says there was no need to post all the data
there are two very simple reason for that.
1. Proof.
2. People will be pissed at Sony for leaving their data so unsecure and therefor it might force a change.
This sucks for Sony but cmon... That is pretty much just asking to be "hacked"
People shouldn't be dumb enough to use the same password for everything, but sadly, people these days are as dumb as rocks.qeinar said:actually, most people use the same password everywhere, so most of the username/passwords could be used to get their email and from there you can get a lot of information.Korey Von Doom said:In all fairness to Sony, why encrypt what someone wouldn't really want, I mean seriously this is more a, look we stole pretty much useless data, we're so bad.
Isn't that potentially a good thing?megaman24681012 said:*sigh* another week, another Sony hack.
*reads article*
wait a minute! those fuckhead hackers want our money so that they can steal our information?! WHAT?!
Maybe the FBI's cyber division should send them some money, then. See where it goes.BDNeon said:Isn't that potentially a good thing?megaman24681012 said:*sigh* another week, another Sony hack.
*reads article*
wait a minute! those fuckhead hackers want our money so that they can steal our information?! WHAT?!
Money leaves a trail after all. Which means it could be an avenue of attack to find these bastards for law enforcement.
Unless your intent wasn't to prove you are uber. Which in this case it is not. If the intent was to undermine Sony and destroy the faith of Sony's customers then it would be logically to assume that the hacker would lie and say that the network was so poorly protected that the simplest hack was able to break in.Agayek said:Logically, if it was better protected, the hackers would say so, because that would mean they were skilled enough to hack past the security on no budget.mojodamm said:Proof? The mouths of hackers spill proof nowadays, interesting.
Since they didn't, it's safe to assume that they are telling the truth. It's not a guarantee by any means, but it does lend quite a bit of support to that argument.