Sony Website Hacked By the "Lulz Boat"
- Thread starter Greg Tito
- Start date
That's the thing, Sony isn't the one who is paying here; it's the consumers. If they really wanted to make a clear-cut point, they wouldn't have (allegedly) stolen people's information and would have either A) targeted the higher ups, B) warn Sony what they could potentially do with the info, or maybe the nicest (I.E. least likely) option C) contact Sony directly and work with them to improve security.will1182 said:
Sony may deserve this, but the consumers don't. They even have the audacity to demand money from the very people they are stealing with. Either way, the consumers are being buttfucked by two bullies.
" All of the personal information that LulzSec were able to steal despite meager means is now posted online, along with a press release stating their intention was merely to call out Sony's botched security measures."
This is the biggest dbag statement in the history of the internet...
This is the biggest dbag statement in the history of the internet...
This shit is so annoying. First, why aren't you encrypting data better Sony? I don't know anything about it, but I can't help but feel you are not doing all you can at this point.
Also, stop being dicks. I used to work with behaviorally disturbed kids and there was a basic rule: If you do something you know will make them violent, then they are not completely at fault. Stop being douche bags and digital tyrants.
This hacking shit is obnoxious. All this is going to do is lead to internet controlling legislation and invasion of privacy. These "lulz" guys should all be lined up and shot, anyone who steals data should really. I know that if I caught a guy in my house without all the lights on, looking through my shit, someone would be going to the hospital and it wouldn't be me.
Also, stop being dicks. I used to work with behaviorally disturbed kids and there was a basic rule: If you do something you know will make them violent, then they are not completely at fault. Stop being douche bags and digital tyrants.
This hacking shit is obnoxious. All this is going to do is lead to internet controlling legislation and invasion of privacy. These "lulz" guys should all be lined up and shot, anyone who steals data should really. I know that if I caught a guy in my house without all the lights on, looking through my shit, someone would be going to the hospital and it wouldn't be me.
I agree that LulzSec's intentions were likely not "to show vulnerability", but data security is fairly simple (at least in regard to the exploit they used).Kopikatsu said:
Sony could have fixed this, fairly easily, in a couple of ways.
First (and this is a stupid basic concept in security), do not store all your data in the same place. Require user validation for first access, to things like username and password, then require another round of user validation to access personal information, and yet another to access opt-in data. That kind of thing would have made their hack retrieve only the topmost layer, which is just username and password (and if the passwords were properly encrypted, that won't get them much).
Second, encrypt the stupid passwords. All you have to do is apply a simple algorithm before you save it somewhere. The easiest way is to simply hash the value (ie, translate the string into a number through some fancy math: basically you take each letter's ASCII value, give it an exponent based on the length of the string and then add all the numbers together) and store the hash, but there are much more complex algorithms out there that are much more secure than that.
The playstation store has been up for hours and hours. I've already downloaded like fifty gazillion demos off it. The NA customer appreciation plan probably won't be going into effect until the 4th, though.Kysafen said:
Okay, it's only $40, BUT WHO THE HELL IS GIVING THEM MONEY? $20 an hour is more than I make, dammit.LulzSec The Lulz Boat
Our warmest and lulziest thanks to the anonymous BitCoin benefactors in the last two hours. We've received around $40 worth of donations.
In all fairness to Sony, why encrypt what someone wouldn't really want, I mean seriously this is more a, look we stole pretty much useless data, we're so bad.
*sigh* another week, another Sony hack.
*reads article*
wait a minute! those fuckhead hackers want our money so that they can steal our information?! WHAT?!
*reads article*
wait a minute! those fuckhead hackers want our money so that they can steal our information?! WHAT?!
Logically, if it was better protected, the hackers would say so, because that would mean they were skilled enough to hack past the security on no budget.mojodamm said:
Since they didn't, it's safe to assume that they are telling the truth. It's not a guarantee by any means, but it does lend quite a bit of support to that argument.