so .... i should be just peachy keen with Sony actively trying to rip me off, by making me pay for games i already own? there's better ways to make something cheaper, and i hardly see how emulation last gen tech is that big a price booster.rolfwesselius said:Whining about the fact that the ps3 is not backwards compatible while everybody screamed at sony to make it cheaper 100 dollars in fact,Which was only possible by also removing the backwards compatibility alongside using crappier ram.Lunar Templar said:hypocrite?rolfwesselius said:Oh look its you again the sony hypocrite.Lunar Templar said:>.>
ok ..... its EA's game (can't believe i'm about to side with EA ... but ...) where dose Sony even have the right to say no to events like this? or have they gotten, dumber, since i 'left'
Ot: It's probably sony not wanting to lower psn barriers without a good reason.
*gets a chair and waits for that explanation*
Im not meaning to be an ass but in my books it is hypocritical to say being able to remove 100 to 200 dollars of the production cost in trade of Bcb.
And saying that that is evil just smacks of stupidity
not that it maters, my PS3 is gone
btw, that's not hypocritical. hypocrisy is speaking out against something then doing it anyway. IE. Zeel playing ME3 would make him a hypocrite