That's actually an interesting take on the situation. I suppose it is a bit like a library or a video shop... but not really.
I can't see piracy as something that's going to just go away anytime in the near future. Reaching a middle ground between peer to peer sites, their users and the folks that are getting ripped off by it would be somewhat beneficial for all. This sort of thinking seems like it's nearly a step in that direction.
I feel like pointing out since reading some comments that the judges didn't say piracy was legal just what the site was doing was. Since none of the content being hosted was theirs and they were just acting as a means to facilitate sharing files in the same way a library would facilitate sharing books. They made their money off the sites advertising not by stealing themselves. It's a bit of a stretch. I bet Spanish 'pirates' still receive warning from their ISPs.
I can't see piracy as something that's going to just go away anytime in the near future. Reaching a middle ground between peer to peer sites, their users and the folks that are getting ripped off by it would be somewhat beneficial for all. This sort of thinking seems like it's nearly a step in that direction.
I feel like pointing out since reading some comments that the judges didn't say piracy was legal just what the site was doing was. Since none of the content being hosted was theirs and they were just acting as a means to facilitate sharing files in the same way a library would facilitate sharing books. They made their money off the sites advertising not by stealing themselves. It's a bit of a stretch. I bet Spanish 'pirates' still receive warning from their ISPs.