Splinter Cell Stunt Goes Stupidly Wrong

Denamic

New member
Aug 19, 2009
3,804
0
0
danpascooch said:
Denamic said:
Still, all PR is good PR.
Not really
Same as with RapeLay.
Barely anyone knew it even existed.
Then a media outrage about the game occurred.
And the game's sales sky-rocketed for a time.

Exposure = good.
Even if said exposure is negative.
 

CoverYourHead

High Priest of C'Thulhu
Dec 7, 2008
2,514
0
0
I think UbiSoft is trying to kill their own company. I really do. I cannot, for the life of me, think of a way this would've turned out well. Really. What the hell?
 

Kwaren

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,129
0
0
My state is an open carry state and many people (including myself) regularly carry pistols in open view. That guy would have been killed if he tried it here.
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
dehawaiiansupaman said:
Yeah who ever thought up this idea must really not want a job. They'll be lucky to be employed at any marketing firm after this mess. Seriously who thinks walking into a bar with a fake gun is a good way to promote a game?
The guy with the bandaged hands holding a gun in a bar.
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
tkioz said:
Dude was lucky it was in a country where there are tight gun control laws and not some where like... oh Texas where he'd of got his balls shot off by everyone person in the bar.
ah yes, the country of Texas
(I had to)
----
Naw I get what your saying only I think its UNFORTUNATE he wasn't in Texas.
 

Sir Kemper

New member
Jan 21, 2010
2,248
0
0
Formica Archonis said:
Sir Kemper said:
I fail to see how this is bad marketing.

Since that stunt around 100 more people know about Splinter Cell.
Yeah, the game that made them fear for their lives and think they might never see their loved ones again. I somehow doubt they'll be lining up to get one. And the only publicity this'll be earning the game is as "the game with the retarded publicity stunt", which won't make it past the gaming press.

So, IMHO it failed at both making a good impression and making a large impression. Without either one it's a complete failure.
Way to completely misread my post.

Okay, let me put it this way:

Untill this story where you even thinking of splinter cell? No, probably not, however, thanks to this little publicity stunt people are going to notice the game, specifically gamer's, and people who think "Golly, that game got alot of attention becuase of that dumbass publicity stunt, mayby i should check it out."

Think of something like the Hot Coffee fiasco, but on a much, much smaller scale.
 

Ithera

New member
Apr 4, 2010
449
0
0
Guns and public settings do not match, what were they thinking? The people at their marketing department need to revise their way of thinking.
 

Formica Archonis

Anonymous Source
Nov 13, 2009
2,312
0
0
Sir Kemper said:
Okay, let me put it this way:

Untill this story where you even thinking of splinter cell? No, probably not,
I don't think about what I don't like, so no. The only boost they got this time is making me actually read past the headline.

Sir Kemper said:
however, thanks to this little publicity stunt people are going to notice the game, specifically gamer's, and people who think "Golly, that game got alot of attention becuase of that dumbass publicity stunt, mayby i should check it out."
There are a lot of morons out there, no argument there. But most gamers at this point I imagine are either committed to Splinter Cell or indifferent about it. This sort of garbage only works if the target audience has never heard of the game. Most gamers have seen or heard of the previous Splinter Cells and decided one way or the other. It doesn't really increase mindshare, since the people who hear of it have not only already heard of it, they've already passed judgement. Honestly, that's why I didn't think of you as meaning gamers when you said "100 people". People who read the Escapist et al. likely know what Splinter Cell is even if they never played it.

Okay, if there was mass outrage it'd pick up some people who don't read the gaming press. But screwed-up publicity stunts are a dime a dozen. To get some real mass outrage going you have to invoke the demons of the day and make a lasting impression that you can't or won't back away from. If Ubisoft repeats this stunt again and comes out saying they support terrorizing the populace, THEN you'll see mass outrage. Are Satanic cults or rainbow parties back in vogue? Maybe something involving one of those could work. I don't know, what's the new thing teenagers aren't doing that Oprah says they're doing?

Sir Kemper said:
Think of something like the Hot Coffee fiasco, but on a much, much smaller scale.
Yeah, but Hot Coffee was about sex in the game. The outrage was a big neon sign to teenagers: "HEY! BUY THIS GAME GET SEX!" Loon with a fake gun doesn't provide the value-add Hot Coffee did.
 

Ekonk

New member
Apr 21, 2009
3,120
0
0
lollerskates, that's the worst publicity stunt I ever heard.

OR PERHAPS IT WAS SUPPOSED TO FAIL AND IT'S WORKING WHERE IS MY TINFOIL HAT
 

Boba Frag

New member
Dec 11, 2009
1,288
0
0
LordOfInsanity said:
A man doing a spy crawling act on a building side would be a publicity stunt.

Pulling out a gun, even fake, in a group of people? That's Darwin Award material.
Absolutely!! Fucking hell, that was retarded. Would it have killed them to have a guy dressed like Fisher pop out of a ventilation shaft during a press conference? Or abseil off a building for a crowd, taking the spokesman "hostage"?

I'm amazed that actor guy didn't get the shit knocked out of him.
Wow, who would have thought people don't like guns (however fake looking) being pointed at them? :p
 

dochmbi

New member
Sep 15, 2008
753
0
0
Being a moron isn't a crime in New Zealand, however, so when all was said and done the police merely cautioned two men at the scene
How is it not a crime in this instance? Waving around a gun and threatening people, even if it's a fake gun and there are no ill intentions involved is still a crime where I come from.
 

Jaranja

New member
Jul 16, 2009
3,275
0
0
GamingAwesome1 said:
How the hell could they have thought that would've been a good idea and no-one would be alarmed?

Fail pubilicity stunt is fail.
I think you're missing the point.

They probably got more publicity from it "failing".
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
thenumberthirteen said:
How could have this have gone right? what was their plan? To hold people at gunpoint and hand out fliers?!

1. Send armed gunman into town

2. Threaten people

3. ????????

4. PROFIT!
Thank you, that was the most succinct meme I've ever seen.
 

ethaninja

New member
Oct 14, 2009
3,144
0
0
Haha dumbassess. It remindes me of when I was a kid and my mate was walking around with a BB gun. He didn't think he would have gotten in trouble for it. What a moron.
 

Danpascooch

Zombie Specialist
Apr 16, 2009
5,231
0
0
Denamic said:
danpascooch said:
Denamic said:
Still, all PR is good PR.
Not really
Same as with RapeLay.
Barely anyone knew it even existed.
Then a media outrage about the game occurred.
And the game's sales sky-rocketed for a time.

Exposure = good.
Even if said exposure is negative.
I'd be interested to hear how you know the games sales skyrocketed.