Star Trek Game "Emotionally Hurt" J.J. Abrams

[fix-the-spade]

Those three directors are theoretically JUST as risky, in terms of the most recent works. Elysium and Iron Man 2 were just humorous in that "Bad movie" kind of way.

David Fincher would be interesting on the other hand......

But at least it's risky and not a foregone conclusion, if Abrams makes it you've seen the film before it's come out and there was nothing interesting anyway, just a lot of lens flare and a couple BWWOOOOOMMM noises.

While I'm at it, Brett Ratner, Guillermo Del Toro, bollocks to it, I would take Michael Bay over JJ Abrams, at the very least Bay isn't afraid to make characters die and the action would be suitably chaotic.

For the record I quite like Iron Man 2, I honestly missed whatever it is that irritates everyone so much about it.

 

[DerangedHobo]

JJ Abrams is full of wank.
He takes IPs, remakes them into mediocre movies at best and then smug smiles to the camera while people throw money at him then he turns around and bad mouths a game (a GAME, not a movie a GAME) and acts like this watered down piece of shit is any worse than his watered down fan pandering sack of shit. Fuck JJ Abrams, he's a terrible director. He is the Michael Bay of Sci-fi but at least Michael Bay can make something half decent every once in a while.

 

[Blood Brain Barrier]

You know, there's actually never even been a good Star Trek game. You'd think that with like... 40+ years to do it, at least one good one would have come out.

Elite Force was not good.

Star Trek: 25th Anniversary
Star Trek: Judgement Rites
Star Trek: A Final Unity
Star Trek: Bridge Commander
Star Trek: First Contact
Star Trek: The Transinium Challenge

Play those and then come back to me claiming there's never been a good Star Trek Game. Actually, don't do that. Everyone knows you're wrong anyway.