faefrost said:
The original Lightsaber designs were obviously very Kendo inspired. But they have added some flair and differentiation with individual characters since. Count Dooku's Lightsaber in particular was a fencing blade and hilt, reflecting Christopher Lee's skill as a fencer. Darth Maul obviously pulled from a different weapon tradition. As did Ashoka Tano and Ventriss in the Clone Wars.
Let's be honest Lightsabers are inherently stupid weapons. Cool but stupid. They are just a means for visual story telling. Once you accept that they exist, the specifics are simply window dressing and allegory. The European style hilted long bladed Lightsaber probably tells us more about the weilder than the technical aspects of how it is used. It implies they are playing up the character as a Knight or a Crusader of some sort. Someone questing for some holy grail perhaps?
I have to wonder about that.
The Jedi where already linked heavily to the Sōhei to begin with (I know they are better known for their use of the naginata, but the point is buddhist warrior monks).
they could be doing some universe restructuring, this could be a sign that since Luke was the only jedi after movie 6 his school of thought might be vastly different.
Or a sign of cultural changes over the last 30 years.
Are they restructuring the use of the force, making it more western dogmatic/mystic veiw as opposed to eastern mysticism sort of veiw(Gnostic reinterpretation would be fucking cool).
Are we going to see some philosophical war undertones, if they are invoking Kotor, 1 & 2 (mostly 2) that would be awesome.
Are they trying to homogenize the roles, is the lightsaber just thoughtlessness.
Is this jedi a crusader in common terms, a brute, a limper (fro the black company books, cool guy, wouldn't die no matter what) of the new movies.