Zannah said:Trolldor said:Yes, they should, if their actions break laws and put steam at a legal risk.Zannah said:I'm astonished people actually side with steam here, saying "If they want to rip off people that isn't me, sure let them". Way to go people, way to go.
But hey, a gamer social enough to protect fellow gamers from being ripped off is clearly a first rate criminal, and Valve should totally be allowed to light his house on fire.
And what legal risk is that? He was gifted some money on paypal, he gifted people some games, neither of which is illegal, no sale is taking place, no contracts are signed. The only thing in danger here, is the policy of ripping people off because money is shiny.
So if my family back in the Us would buy me a game for christmas, and send it over here to sweden, that'd be breaking tax laws how exactly?Zer_ said:Breaking local tax laws. This has been explained over and over again throughout the course of this thread. :/
If you were to send the money for them to do it, then yes. Sending a few games to friends in EU won't bring up alarm bells. Selling games wholesale to EU people will.Zannah said:So if my family back in the Us would buy me a game for christmas, and send it over here to sweden, that'd be breaking tax laws how exactly?Zer_ said:Breaking local tax laws. This has been explained over and over again throughout the course of this thread. :/
GamersGate, Impulse & Direct2Drive do the exact same thing. As does Retail.Chibz said:Technically they ARE losing something. They can't rip off non-american gamers quite as easily if people do this. Part of why I won't have anything to do with Steam.
The thing is, as long as there's no contracts being signed, there's no legal connection between "gifting people games" and "sending a dude money over paypal". He didn't open an internet store, he helped a few people out. Connecting the two, is a conclusion that valve is jumping to, and by no means a legal basis to act on. Does "innocent until proven guilty" ring a bell to anyone?Zer_ said:If you were to send the money for them to do it, then yes. Sending a few games to friends in EU won't bring up alarm bells. Selling games wholesale to EU people will.
Tax Evasion is a FELONY.Zannah said:I'm astonished people actually side with steam here, saying "If they want to rip off people that isn't me, sure let them". Way to go people, way to go.
But hey, a gamer social enough to protect fellow gamers from being ripped off is clearly a first rate criminal, and Valve should totally be allowed to light his house on fire.
It would not break any laws.Zannah said:So if my family back in the Us would buy me a game for christmas, and send it over here to sweden, that'd be breaking tax laws how exactly?Zer_ said:Breaking local tax laws. This has been explained over and over again throughout the course of this thread. :/
Yes, I support people accused of Felony with out any means of ever being proven, if what they do is the right thing, that just happens to be illegal. Also, ripping of customers in digital retail, is not happening due to taxes and laws, it's happening due to plain old greed.Pyro Paul said:Tax Evasion is a FELONY.
You Support protecting FELONS that are clearly violating the Rule of Law?
He wasn't being Generious gifting people games in lands far away.
He was Being Paid to Bypass Local Laws and Taxes.
You're supporting Greed more so then people defending valve.Zannah said:Yes, I support people accused of Felony with out any means of ever being proven, if what they do is the right thing, that just happens to be illegal. Also, ripping of customers in digital retail, is not happening due to taxes and laws, it's happening due to plain old greed.Pyro Paul said:Tax Evasion is a FELONY.
You Support protecting FELONS that are clearly violating the Rule of Law?
He wasn't being Generious gifting people games in lands far away.
He was Being Paid to Bypass Local Laws and Taxes.
But anyway, I rest my case. People believe what they want to believed, too bad no one seems to be willing to phrase why they want to believe that.
Just because there are no contracts, doesn't mean it's not illegal. Second, I side with Valve because if anything like this was brought to light, where Valve did NOT react to fix the problem, then Valve risks losing the ability to sell their product in some EU countries. Valve may also have to pay a significant fine for assisting in tax evasion. They made this move to protect their business, and keep selling games in the European countries.Zannah said:The thing is, as long as there's no contracts being signed, there's no legal connection between "gifting people games" and "sending a dude money over paypal". He didn't open an internet store, he helped a few people out. Connecting the two, is a conclusion that valve is jumping to, and by no means a legal basis to act on. Does "innocent until proven guilty" ring a bell to anyone?Zer_ said:If you were to send the money for them to do it, then yes. Sending a few games to friends in EU won't bring up alarm bells. Selling games wholesale to EU people will.
Of course we all know, he did it, but it can't be legally proven, and therefore he did nothing illegal, nor did Valve risk anything aside from undeserved profits.
And of course, what he did, even when technically bordering the illegal, was still you know... nice, social and morally right. The only harm done, is that a company couldn't pull a fast one on a dozen european gamers, for a few extra bucks. So my original point stands, how can anyone in their right mind side with the greedy corporation here?
No. With that analogy you are saying that if someone in Australia imported a game because it was cheaper than buying it in the local retail they should be banned from their country?Blue_vision said:Okay, perhaps a better analogy would be someone importing a bunch of dvds from china or something, and then selling them inside a local electronics store at half price. I'd say that the store owners are right within their legal/moral grounds to kick the guy out of the store.Gather said:I don't know... That anology would be more correct if the care was say, 30,000 USD in America but 50,000 USD in Europe and the person who stole the car only gave 30,000 USD.
Edit: You paying for an agreed price on a game; be it that the price was lower than the price for the person it was given to...
Actually, for a better analogy: Ever bought something overseas because it was cheaper than buying it here? Steam just banned him for that (Apparently)
Taxes can't be charged on online purchases due to admin overheads in most countries, few countries have mechanisms for this. This is not illegal in anyway, there are American businesses that buy by proxy to bypass manufacturer's restrictions on exporting. There is no legal recourse manufacturers or publishers can take can take to stop this and the only reason suppliers comply with export restrictions is to maintain supply.Pyro Paul said:Tax Evasion is a FELONY.Zannah said:I'm astonished people actually side with steam here, saying "If they want to rip off people that isn't me, sure let them". Way to go people, way to go.
But hey, a gamer social enough to protect fellow gamers from being ripped off is clearly a first rate criminal, and Valve should totally be allowed to light his house on fire.
You Support protecting FELONS that are clearly violating the Rule of Law?
He wasn't being Generious gifting people games in lands far away.
He was Being Paid to Bypass Local Laws and Taxes.
Yeppah. I shouldn't post before I eat my breakfast...Daveman said:]I'd agree but that seems like a MASSIVE effort for one guy... that is unless he was doing this gifting on a huge scale. tbh I don't see why he didn't just open a new steam account for it if that was the case though, then he wouldn't lose his games. Although they'd probably see through that and close down his other accounts. EDIT: also, I think you mean "Valve".
As a Canadian I DL games off XBLA the PSN and Wii Shop Channel. I actually find that even though Microsoft charges us 12.5% more (through giving 200 points fewer per $20 spent) they rip us off less than real stores. Nintendo sometimes sells stuff for LESS because they sell their points for the same amount, and our store is the US store.CCountZero said:But yeah, as stated above, if you really take issue with it to the point of not wanting to use Steam, then there's not really any place that I know of for you to buy Digital![]()
Why do you people keep bringing up Tax Evasion? That's a completely irrelevant and flawed point that has been ripped apart by myself repeatedly. If anything Valve (and the publishers) were upset that they were, personally, losing money. So, to defend that extra bit of profit, they "dealt with" the guy.Zer_ said:Just because there are no contracts, doesn't mean it's not illegal. Second, I side with Valve because if anything like this was brought to light, where Valve did NOT react to fix the problem, then Valve risks losing the ability to sell their product in some EU countries. Valve may also have to pay a significant fine for assisting in tax evasion. They made this move to protect their business, and keep selling games in the European countries.