bahumat42 said:Digital ownership isn't the same. Its more like a right to use the data yourself rather than actually owning something. If you break their rules you lose that right (as far as im aware). And trying to bypass their system (in a fairly large way) is likely to annoy them. And probably the developers who release products on their service too. As a business it has needs and it needs to put those interests quite high, otherwise it would cause problems for them.
Yeah, I figured as much, but I was just pointing out it wasn't as clear cut as it seemed.Zachary Amaranth said:First Sale doesn't extend here. This is one of the hazards of digital distribution, Steam or otherwise.
I'd agree but that seems like a MASSIVE effort for one guy... that is unless he was doing this gifting on a huge scale. tbh I don't see why he didn't just open a new steam account for it if that was the case though, then he wouldn't lose his games. Although they'd probably see through that and close down his other accounts. EDIT: also, I think you mean "Valve".Fleischer said:My guess would be that amergift gifted a bunch of people - well beyond the average users levels - of gift accounts, and then Value thought to themselves, we have full access to the Steam ID's of everyone he gifted to. Value could then send e-mails to those people with a stern warning that they were taking place in the crime of tax evasion. Also, Value has access to the e-mails and bank account numbers of all those involved parties. I'm sure Value would send a friendly letter to Paypal to cross check a set of bank account numbers, and to see if there was any payments between these parties.
The government would most likely need search warrants to carry out these steps; however, corporations are less restrained by Constitutions.
Yeah, exactly, if it is just illegal then indeed "tough shit" but I was merely trying to point out (as I said above) that it wasn't so obvious to the ordinary observer because you can understand why most people would think it's fine.MassiveGeek said:It's not about what you think, this is about if it's illegal or not. Morality doesn't really matter in this situation - what he did was(from what I gather) in fact illegal.
There isn't much more to it than that. If it turns out Steam were just pissy about the loophole, then they should admit that and give him his account back or something. But if it was illegal - tough shit.
Also if there is a tax its not vat since that would be illegal as the max vat in the eu is 25% with discretion to countries and the vat on steam games would amount to 26% across all countriesWhy would a Steam account be disabled?
Check the contact e-mail address for your Steam account to see if Steam Support has contacted you regarding the reason your account was disabled - accounts may be temporarily disabled pending verification of purchase information or account ownership.
Steam Support does not automatically contact the owners of disabled accounts in most circumstances.
There is a Zero-Tolerance policy for any violations of the Steam Subscriber Agreement and Online Code of Conduct. All accounts in a user's possession for any of the following activities will be disabled:
Redeeming Fraudulent Gifts
Never accept a gift from an unknown user. Any accounts tied to a redeemed gift from a fraudulent source may be disabled.
Was it an all steam ban or a VAC ban?Bobic said:Gindil said:No. You just lose access to Steam secured servers.Bobic said:If your steam account gets banned do you lose access to all the games you bought for yourself?Ok, one of you heartless fiends is lying to me.Gather said:Yes.Bobic said:If your steam account gets banned do you lose access to all the games you bought for yourself?
Yes, they should, if their actions break laws and put steam at a legal risk.Zannah said:I'm astonished people actually side with steam here, saying "If they want to rip off people that isn't me, sure let them". Way to go people, way to go.
But hey, a gamer social enough to protect fellow gamers from being ripped off is clearly a first rate criminal, and Valve should totally be allowed to light his house on fire.
And what legal risk is that? He was gifted some money on paypal, he gifted people some games, neither of which is illegal, no sale is taking place, no contracts are signed. The only thing in danger here, is the policy of ripping people off because money is shiny.Trolldor said:Yes, they should, if their actions break laws and put steam at a legal risk.Zannah said:I'm astonished people actually side with steam here, saying "If they want to rip off people that isn't me, sure let them". Way to go people, way to go.
But hey, a gamer social enough to protect fellow gamers from being ripped off is clearly a first rate criminal, and Valve should totally be allowed to light his house on fire.
Zannah said:Trolldor said:Yes, they should, if their actions break laws and put steam at a legal risk.Zannah said:I'm astonished people actually side with steam here, saying "If they want to rip off people that isn't me, sure let them". Way to go people, way to go.
But hey, a gamer social enough to protect fellow gamers from being ripped off is clearly a first rate criminal, and Valve should totally be allowed to light his house on fire.
And what legal risk is that? He was gifted some money on paypal, he gifted people some games, neither of which is illegal, no sale is taking place, no contracts are signed. The only thing in danger here, is the policy of ripping people off because money is shiny.
So if my family back in the Us would buy me a game for christmas, and send it over here to sweden, that'd be breaking tax laws how exactly?Zer_ said:Breaking local tax laws. This has been explained over and over again throughout the course of this thread. :/
If you were to send the money for them to do it, then yes. Sending a few games to friends in EU won't bring up alarm bells. Selling games wholesale to EU people will.Zannah said:So if my family back in the Us would buy me a game for christmas, and send it over here to sweden, that'd be breaking tax laws how exactly?Zer_ said:Breaking local tax laws. This has been explained over and over again throughout the course of this thread. :/