im sorry but i wouldnt want the current empire running anything. I mean lets look at the facts if the imperials hold up in skyrim they would still be fighting rebels even if ulfric loses, same if the stormcloaks win they'll still be fighting hold outs. The only way this would end in any good way for the whole of those involed would be for the imperials to allow ulfric to rule and after as you stated he failed go back in and restore order, or if he did manage to rule effectively the empire gets a strong ally to the north in a highly defendible area that they can have attack the enimey they have a treaty with without true suport therefore never actualy breaking their word.Evil Top Hat said:This is also a very solid point. However, Skyrims position and easy to defend nature is not really argument in favour of either side. If the Stormcloaks win, they stand a chance of being able to defend Skyrim, if the Imperials win, and they break the peace treaty, the same applies to them as well.YawningAngel said:How the hell do you think the Aldmeri are going to invade Skyrim? I don't know if you've tried, but I suggest you consider how hard it is to leave Skyrim without being able to fly over mountains. Skyrim is incredibly, mind-blowingly easy to defend because every single entrance is a narrow mountain pass and this is a world where it is not only feasible but fairly easy to bathe a small area in magical fire that will kill most normal people on a constant basis.
Even if the Imperials lose all of their territory and are totally dominated by the Dominion but for Skyrim alone, I would still rather the Imperials were the ones left to defending what's left of it, as apposed to a group of rebels that are more interested in Nord supremacy than building a fair kingdom, under a King that can barely run two cities and a couple of villages.
But in my opinion they tried to kill me and i sure as hell going to try and kill them back.