I think this is poor study design. While it can have some contributing factors to being the most marginalised kid in the year level who is at the bottom of the hierarchy, there are a number of reasons othe Escapists have brought up which count in individual circumstances.
Also trying to quantify a study like this with figures like 10% when it's highly qualitative data which differs depending on genetic, socioeconomic and environmental factors are flimsy. I think they need a wider scope of possible causes because while kids who have trouble fitting in can be bullied, they're not the only ones and sometimes not even the worst affected targets.
Also trying to quantify a study like this with figures like 10% when it's highly qualitative data which differs depending on genetic, socioeconomic and environmental factors are flimsy. I think they need a wider scope of possible causes because while kids who have trouble fitting in can be bullied, they're not the only ones and sometimes not even the worst affected targets.