Mazty said:
Asehujiko said:
Mazty said:
He just needs to come to terms with he is the bad guy in this instance and the law sees it that way.
Except that sony is in a big "shoot the messenger" mood and is is violating every single "fair trial" law in existence here.
"You helped promote and further the hacking of the PS3 anti-copyright system"
No, it seems pretty fair to label him the criminal here.
First off, there's way too much going on with the case to just shorten up events into one sentence. And secondly, did you miss the part about the fair trial in that quote? Maybe you didn't notice, but Sony is trying really hard to make sure GeoHot doesn't get one by suing him in California courts.
The way I see it, either both Sony and GeoHot are the bad guys, or Sony is the bad guy and GeoHot is the good guy (it really depends on your views of the Install Other OS fiasco). But I see no way in which Sony is the good guy. They removed an advertised feature and forced people to choose between that feature or online features of the console. They're trying to get a list of names of everyone who simply watched fail overflow's hacking video (just for watching a video!). And again, they're trying to sue GeoHot all the way in California to keep some kind of "home court advantage" despite the fact that GeoHot did all the things they're suing him for somewhere else. Suing people doesn't even help secure the PS3 platform, GeoHot himself had his computers and PS3s taken away because of the restraining order, and yet firmware 3.56 for the PS3 was hacked in mere HOURS without him having access to it. So the lawsuit itself is not "Sony protecting its customers" or anything noble like that.
No matter how I look at this, at the very least Sony is always wearing a pair of horns and holding a red pitchfork.