Rozalia1 said:
Every time you post one of these you only enforce the very simple solution to all your queries... but you already know that.
To be honest, I don't know. I don't even know the general point of this post. What might that be? Please try not to be an asshole when you answer. Thanks.
Squilookle said:
You know, you could do a lot worse than try out playi...
ninja666 said:
Cite the part of the OP where I mentioned I want tomb raiding in the game. You can't find anything? That's because I didn't say anything like it. I just want the game to be set in adventure movie-like places.
Wow- really? If that's the reception we can expect for people genuinely trying to help you... think I'll keep my suggestion to myself after all.
I'm sorry for my general asshole-ish behavior yesterday (at least it was "yesterday" in my time zone, but you get my meaning). I was a little angry and sleep deprived, so some of these are written under the influence of emotions. I tried my hardest to keep my cool, but looks like I didn't manage to. You can expect me to be much nicer today. I also respect you, folks, for actually bearing with me despite all this.
TheYellowCellPhone said:
Besides the titles everyone's suggested already like Shadow of Mordor, Arkham, and Dishonored, go for Titanfall. It has everything you said except for a focus on stealth.
I don't know what makes you think I want a game
focused on stealth. All I want is a fast, dynamic, cover-based shooter with an option of stealthy approach. Also, I didn't mention that, but I absolutely hate this style of "combat" games like AC, Batman and Shadow of Mordor have.
And Titanfall doesn't have
everything I'm looking for. You think I enjoyed Tomb Raider for its multiplayer?
Adam Jensen said:
- James Bond 007: Blood Stone, in that case. There are some driving section every now and then, but it's essentially a third person shooter with some stealth elements.
- Kane and Lynch also comes to mind.
- Sniper Elite 3.
- Then there's Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes, but that's not much more than a payed demo. So keep an eye on Phantom Pain. It comes out next year and it's got all that you want.
All of these games, apart from Kane and Lynch (which I've already beaten), you're suggesting are
too stealth-oriented. Look earlier in this post (the part right above your quotation) - I've explained what I wanted pretty clearly, I think.
Zhukov said:
Plenty of the games mentioned here by other people are good or worth looking into in their own right, but nothing I'd compare to the feel of the mechanics of TR 2013.
A lot of that fluid feel of TR 2013's combat came from the "soft cover" system, where you just move next to cover rather than sticking to it, and can move away just as easily.
So, strictly on paper, none of the games suggested come even close to what I want?
Zhukov said:
I'm going to very tentatively suggest the more recent Splinter Cell games, namely Conviction and [/i]Blacklist[/i]. But that's focussing on mechanics alone and ignoring the "adventure story" requirement, which you said you were willing to do. Even then, they're a bit of a stretch.
Honestly, I would've gladly played them, if not for Ubi's "easier is better" approach. Hand-holding isn't something bad in my book and, when used right, can make the experience much less frustrating, but automatic headshots combined with enemies dumb as a rock was an overkill, especially since I found stealth, where I could headshot two people from 100m away using nothing but my aiming skills, so satisfying in TR2013.
OneCatch said:
ninja666 said:
While Hitman games indeed allow you to take whatever approach you desire, they're always punishing you for everything but stealth - it doesn't forbid you to just kick the door down and run in with a machinegun from the very start, but the chances you'll survive are next to none.
In the newest one they've made the run and gun approach rather easier and a little deeper. You can heal up, melee combat is improved, environments are more combat friendly, tougher enemies use squad combat tactics. It's a Hitman game so you're still 'supposed' to be stealthy, but it certainly doesn't penalise you for going loud. They've added elements to make it a more valid gameplay style.
Still, it's a stealth-oriented game and that's what you probably have to focus on while playing.
OneCatch said:
The Rainbow Six: Vegas games were less ridiculously hardcore than the original, and featured a lot of the same gameplay elements as Gears with some non-mandatory stealth mechanics.
Possibly also the newer Ghost Recons, but they're more squad-based from what I hear.
Played all of these already, but have mixed feelings about them in context of this thread.