With a cleaver?Father Time said:How exactly do you hack someone in real life?TheDarkEricDraven said:An agoraphobic? What a master of terror he must be. Proof Lulsex is a bunch of wimps who hide behind a computer to do things they'd be scared to in real life.
Generic Gamer said:Technically speaking you can erase a log after you're done with it but there's no purpose to doing that seeing as it leaves a massive great gap where an entry should be that you can then recover. You can alter logs a well but if the sysadmin suspects something's up they'll either have a backup of the logs or they can recover the altered data plus maybe the program used to do it.
To be honest these guys are probably using something like onion routing for their IRC chats, the problem with that being that onion routing is compromised as an anonymous routing method but that fact hasn't permeated into the online community yet. Both TOR and 'seven proxies' are thought to be far more effective than they actually are.
It's a running log stored on the hosting server.Low Key said:Current session logs have to be kept for bookkeeping and kicking unwanted users.
Why would they lie about that? To keep their reputation? When all but one of their members have been hunted down the last guy is going to be insisting that nothing is wrong on their twitter page. Unless someone hacks it which would be some hilarious poetic justice.DannyBoy451 said:I dunno, I don't see why they'd lie about that, but regardless of whether he's affiliated with them he's still going to get shitfucked.SirBryghtside said:Yeah, because they'd admit defeat like that.DannyBoy451 said:From their Twitter:
Source: http://twitter.com/#!/lulzsecLulzSec The Lulz Boat
Ryan Cleary is not part of LulzSec; we house one of our many legitimate chatrooms on his IRC server, but that's it. youtube.com/watch?v=Jf7iBS?
Don't get moist over nothing.
I'm not saying he's definitely a part of L/S, but that's nothing like 'proof'.
Should have gotten behind 7 proxies etc.
>Cowardly internet attacksTheDarkEricDraven said:DannyBoy451 said:>Agorophobics are just wimpsTheDarkEricDraven said:An agoraphobic? What a master of terror he must be. Proof Lulsex is a bunch of wimps who hide behind a computer to do things they'd be scared to in real life.
Well that's just mean...Jadak said:So what, he should walk up to people and punch them or something? Prove he's a big manly man and accomplish much less?My point is, they aren't the lords of evil they want to look like. Thier bark is nothing but bark while their bite is just cowerdly internet attacks.Father Time said:How exactly do you hack someone in real life?
I guess "please don't be a hacking dick" is too much to ask? Funny how other people don't seem to have a problem inhibiting their "hacking" impulses, on or off-line. So what makes these smacktards so special.Father Time said:I guess you're right.Drakulea said:With a cleaver?Father Time said:How exactly do you hack someone in real life?TheDarkEricDraven said:An agoraphobic? What a master of terror he must be. Proof Lulsex is a bunch of wimps who hide behind a computer to do things they'd be scared to in real life.
Then we definitely shouldn't encourage them to take their act offline.
We may not be but we do however have Extradition treaties with the U.K and most of European country's so we have every right to get involved with someone who intends to commit a crime against us.Scrubiii said:Maybe American penalties are harsher and maybe your government does believe that. Unfortunately, he is a British citizen, he committed a crime in Britain and as such should be tried in Britain.Normandyfoxtrot said:I suspect we believe our penalties are higher and that our interest where more impacted than British.Scrubiii said:What's that? Someone in Britain has committed a crime on the internet? Extradite them immediately!
Seriously America, leave us alone. We can deal with our own criminals.
The US government is not a global law-enforcement agency no matter how much they might want to be. This man has a right to be tried in his home country.
You should put up those sarcasm tags buddy lest you get called out for trolling.TStormer said:I like lulzsec, they remind me of the old internet before it got flooded by people with social skills and morals.
I don't think that guy is guilty of anything, the govmn'ts can't do anything so they need a scapegoat to make it seem like they are fighting back.
Scrubiii said:Maybe American penalties are harsher and maybe your government does believe that. Unfortunately, he is a British citizen, he committed a crime in Britain and as such should be tried in Britain.Normandyfoxtrot said:I suspect we believe our penalties are higher and that our interest where more impacted than British.Scrubiii said:What's that? Someone in Britain has committed a crime on the internet? Extradite them immediately!
Seriously America, leave us alone. We can deal with our own criminals.
The US government is not a global law-enforcement agency no matter how much they might want to be. This man has a right to be tried in his home country.[/]
Except they'd only be against crimes committed against England and only England, the United states only wants to try him for the crimes against the united states.