Suspected Lulzsec Hacker found... in Essex

Phenakist

New member
Feb 25, 2009
589
0
0
In Essex? Give then credit where credits due, they do know how to hide... a computer whizz among uneducated drunken bi-lunar party goers who'd have thought...
 

Drakulea

New member
Feb 23, 2011
108
0
0
Father Time said:
TheDarkEricDraven said:
An agoraphobic? What a master of terror he must be. Proof Lulsex is a bunch of wimps who hide behind a computer to do things they'd be scared to in real life.
How exactly do you hack someone in real life?
With a cleaver?
 

CarlMin

New member
Jun 6, 2010
1,411
0
0
Seeing as a hate Lulzsec this is good news to me. That group of immature punks, attentionwhoring and celebrating their shallow meme-orientated internet culture. It's just gross.
 

Low Key

New member
May 7, 2009
2,503
0
0
Generic Gamer said:
Technically speaking you can erase a log after you're done with it but there's no purpose to doing that seeing as it leaves a massive great gap where an entry should be that you can then recover. You can alter logs a well but if the sysadmin suspects something's up they'll either have a backup of the logs or they can recover the altered data plus maybe the program used to do it.

To be honest these guys are probably using something like onion routing for their IRC chats, the problem with that being that onion routing is compromised as an anonymous routing method but that fact hasn't permeated into the online community yet. Both TOR and 'seven proxies' are thought to be far more effective than they actually are.
Low Key said:
Current session logs have to be kept for bookkeeping and kicking unwanted users.
It's a running log stored on the hosting server.
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,075
0
0
DannyBoy451 said:
SirBryghtside said:
DannyBoy451 said:
From their Twitter:

LulzSec The Lulz Boat
Ryan Cleary is not part of LulzSec; we house one of our many legitimate chatrooms on his IRC server, but that's it. youtube.com/watch?v=Jf7iBS?
Source: http://twitter.com/#!/lulzsec

Don't get moist over nothing.
Yeah, because they'd admit defeat like that.

I'm not saying he's definitely a part of L/S, but that's nothing like 'proof'.
I dunno, I don't see why they'd lie about that, but regardless of whether he's affiliated with them he's still going to get shitfucked.

Should have gotten behind 7 proxies etc.
Why would they lie about that? To keep their reputation? When all but one of their members have been hunted down the last guy is going to be insisting that nothing is wrong on their twitter page. Unless someone hacks it which would be some hilarious poetic justice.
 

DannyBoy451

New member
Jan 21, 2009
906
0
0
TheDarkEricDraven said:
DannyBoy451 said:
TheDarkEricDraven said:
An agoraphobic? What a master of terror he must be. Proof Lulsex is a bunch of wimps who hide behind a computer to do things they'd be scared to in real life.
>Agorophobics are just wimps

Well that's just mean...
Jadak said:
So what, he should walk up to people and punch them or something? Prove he's a big manly man and accomplish much less?
Father Time said:
How exactly do you hack someone in real life?
My point is, they aren't the lords of evil they want to look like. Thier bark is nothing but bark while their bite is just cowerdly internet attacks.
>Cowardly internet attacks
>Stealing your credit cards

To be honest I'd rather someone just punched me.
 

LuckyClover95

New member
Jun 7, 2010
715
0
0
Why is everyone forgetting they hacked Microsoft too? Just saying.
But yeah, of course he's agoraphobic, living up to the hacker stereotype I guess.
 

Drakulea

New member
Feb 23, 2011
108
0
0
Father Time said:
Drakulea said:
Father Time said:
TheDarkEricDraven said:
An agoraphobic? What a master of terror he must be. Proof Lulsex is a bunch of wimps who hide behind a computer to do things they'd be scared to in real life.
How exactly do you hack someone in real life?
With a cleaver?
I guess you're right.

Then we definitely shouldn't encourage them to take their act offline.
I guess "please don't be a hacking dick" is too much to ask? Funny how other people don't seem to have a problem inhibiting their "hacking" impulses, on or off-line. So what makes these smacktards so special.

(Special,special,see what I did there? Agoraphobic? ... eh,forget it )
 

TStormer

New member
Aug 24, 2010
112
0
0
I like lulzsec, they remind me of the old internet before it got flooded by people with social skills and morals.

I don't think that guy is guilty of anything, the govmn'ts can't do anything so they need a scapegoat to make it seem like they are fighting back.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
Well if you hack the CIA then you're a crazy ************ because they are going to get you eventually so, I'm surprised its taking so long I guess.
 

Sinisterair

New member
Oct 15, 2008
353
0
0
Scrubiii said:
Normandyfoxtrot said:
Scrubiii said:
What's that? Someone in Britain has committed a crime on the internet? Extradite them immediately!

Seriously America, leave us alone. We can deal with our own criminals.
I suspect we believe our penalties are higher and that our interest where more impacted than British.
Maybe American penalties are harsher and maybe your government does believe that. Unfortunately, he is a British citizen, he committed a crime in Britain and as such should be tried in Britain.

The US government is not a global law-enforcement agency no matter how much they might want to be. This man has a right to be tried in his home country.
We may not be but we do however have Extradition treaties with the U.K and most of European country's so we have every right to get involved with someone who intends to commit a crime against us.
 

Drakulea

New member
Feb 23, 2011
108
0
0
TStormer said:
I like lulzsec, they remind me of the old internet before it got flooded by people with social skills and morals.

I don't think that guy is guilty of anything, the govmn'ts can't do anything so they need a scapegoat to make it seem like they are fighting back.
You should put up those sarcasm tags buddy lest you get called out for trolling.
 

Normandyfoxtrot

New member
Feb 17, 2011
246
0
0
Scrubiii said:
Normandyfoxtrot said:
Scrubiii said:
What's that? Someone in Britain has committed a crime on the internet? Extradite them immediately!

Seriously America, leave us alone. We can deal with our own criminals.
I suspect we believe our penalties are higher and that our interest where more impacted than British.
Maybe American penalties are harsher and maybe your government does believe that. Unfortunately, he is a British citizen, he committed a crime in Britain and as such should be tried in Britain.

The US government is not a global law-enforcement agency no matter how much they might want to be. This man has a right to be tried in his home country.[/]

Except they'd only be against crimes committed against England and only England, the United states only wants to try him for the crimes against the united states.