Good, I was afraid people would take that post seriously.Zontar said:picard-facepalm-o.gifSiege_TF said:And nobody was killed again. Must have been because everyone all the livestreamers were white, eh?
There are no words.
Good, I was afraid people would take that post seriously.Zontar said:picard-facepalm-o.gifSiege_TF said:And nobody was killed again. Must have been because everyone all the livestreamers were white, eh?
There are no words.
I don't know about the 45% raging at the cops for doing their job part.Jandau said:On the other hand, I can't really fault SWAT here. They did their job, they didn't harm Kootra and went about their work in an orderly fashion. Yes, it's fucked up that this happened, but what were they supposed to do? Say "fuck it, might be a prank, let's watch some reruns of The Wire"?
And if you really want to despair about the state of humanity, just read the Youtube comments for the video. Roughly 45% think the whole thing is hillarious, 45% are raging at the cops for doing their job and maybe 10% are being reasonable human beings.
The sad part is that while I know you were joking, it also would surprise absolutely no one if this happened to a streamer with a somewhat darker complexion and ended with them being shot. Especially since SWAT teams don't have a particularly stellar record for not just shooting people when doing things like serving no knock warrants, raiding the wrong address, etc.Siege_TF said:Good, I was afraid people would take that post seriously.Zontar said:picard-facepalm-o.gifSiege_TF said:And nobody was killed again. Must have been because everyone all the livestreamers were white, eh?
There are no words.
I think at least one guy got over 10 years for his escapades. Look up Matthew Weigman. He's special, though. I guess he did it tons of times. The FBI site says most swatters do it more than once, so it shouldn't be hard to get big legal cases built against them when they're finally tracked down.The Rogue Wolf said:I can think of a great way to shut this down: Anyone caught pulling this sort of "prank" faces the criminal penalties of the crime they faked reporting.
Swatting's going to seem a little less funny when you could face 30-to-life in prison for it.
I say send a small team to anyone making these calls. At least, the officers know what the perp is capable of and why they are raiding in that case. After they tell the jerk they're not there on a bomb threat, they hand them the warrant for his/her arrest. Maybe that will get the message across, even better if the team gets him/her while they have their own mic/webcam, on broadcasting to hopefully even just one other potential swatter.GarouxBloodline said:I find it humorous when these incidents are reported, because there is typically a lot of expressed guilt-tripping, and sections over ethical boundaries. When you think about it, can you honestly expect a person that would do something like this, to even care about the consequences of their actions? Hell, even if these little bastards were caught, they more than likely would not learn the lesson right in front of their faces.
I don't think you quite understand just how valuable that skill is in real combat. If some terrorist is running at you screaming shit with a bomb, he will literally be converted to FULL AMERICAN by performing a full 360 and no-scope his bomb detonator.MarsAtlas said:Seriously, this is more dangerous than those idiots who trying doing 360 no-scopes in real life.
This is my question as well. Why the hell was the cop's first response to get angry about the camera and knock it over? You can hear his angry voice (or one of them) in the background while it happens. "Oh, I'm sorry, I should have stopped to turn off my webcam while you were screaming at me while waving a deadly weapon".ObsidianJones said:So, my question to the cops (and potentially to you, but not in a disrespectful way) is that if cops have nothing to hide about their procedures... Why is their first step always to remove evidence of what they are doing? Why can we be recorded, but they can not. That sort of thing just breeds distrust.
This is just a guess, but it would make sense to me if at that point they were starting to suspect this was a crank call and their first guess was that the streamer guy was the one who called it in.JarinArenos said:This is my question as well. Why the hell was the cop's first response to get angry about the camera and knock it over? You can hear his angry voice (or one of them) in the background while it happens. "Oh, I'm sorry, I should have stopped to turn off my webcam while you were screaming at me while waving a deadly weapon".
What did the gays ever do to these people anywayMarsAtlas said:I'm just waiting until this results in somebody getting injured or killed during a livestream. Then the police find the person, and they get thrown in jail for voluntary manslaughter or homocide. They won't think its a funny thing to do then.
A little while back they caught someone who was responsible for a bunch of Swatting pranks and he is now in an 11 federal prison sentence for his games. We need some more of that, it's incredibly dangerous to both police and the people who the prank is against, it will end up in someone getting shot one day. It'll be some gungho police officer or someone who is armed and does not recognize the police fast enough. I mean, did you watch that video, the police sounded like a bunch mentally handicapped people as the burst through the door, you could barely make out what they were saying. I can't help but feel that they should have a designated caller so they can be understood when they do that.toms said:I hope they find those responsible and come down on them hard.
It is time people learned that the Internet can be a very serious business indeed and true anonymity is an illusion.
Oh, no. It wasn't SWAT is the case I mentioned. It was one single cop who was way too twitchy and probably should have never been allowed anywhere near a gun ever again. Look up some articles [https://www.google.com/search?q=17+year+old+shot+after+answering+door&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a&channel=sb] on the deal. One said in her previous job, she shot a suspect taking off his backpack. She though he was going for a gun when a fellow officer with her said that was unlikely [http://reason.com/blog/2014/03/06/cop-who-fatally-shot-wii-controller-wiel]. I haven't heard what happened to the woman, but police get away with mistakes like this way too often in the modern militarized police forces. I can't find anything on the girl, though. (In fact, my post here showed up on the second page on Google while looking for the story).Rainbow_Dashtruction said:Just for reference, I assume those SWAT guys who shot the children got a huge amount of flak for it? Especially since their trained to react immediately to stuff like that because they could actually be putting there lifes on the line by hesitating?