Want to make a guess as to why male superheros are serious and acclaimed while female superheros are represented as sexual objects dressed in impractical clothing, especially in Hollywood films and television? Here's mine: the people responsible for producing the film, as well as the intended audience, are predominantly male. Because women are relatively uninvolved in both production and demographic (or greenlighting the project), representation and characterization of women in these films is subordinate to what men aged 18-34 "want." That's not to say that male artists can't create good center-stage female characters, or that men aren't interested in such characters, (or that women aren't interested in superheros - or that any of the filmmakers' assumptions are valid,) it's just that the conditions have been set to "stack the deck" against good female representation in superhero movies.Dragunai said:Snip
The people who are making these movies aren't aiming for meaningful representations of female characters. They're aiming to please the explosions and side-boobs market. If these shows were written for and tested against a predominantly female group, women would probably come out looking a little more respectable.
Or maybe not. Maybe there's a deeper sociological issue at work than something a "just add women and stir" solution can fix.