tony2077 said:
AzrealMaximillion said:
tony2077 said:
AzrealMaximillion said:
tony2077 said:
Richardplex said:
tony2077 said:
i hope not i like there games well the ones for the genres i like and Strauss i hope karma doesn't bite you in the ass
Why would Karma bite him? He's made and sourced his observation, and isn't being a dick about it.
don't you know karma's a *****
Ok so what's your point? Strauss still has a pretty good idea of how THQ messed up here. If anything Karma got to THQ with all of the shovelware for kids and the milking of WWE/UFC games.
if karma goes after them for those game then why doesn't it go after the other companies that do the same type of games mainly the yearly sports games and shovelware for kids what the problem with those
Did you read the article? What franchises other than Saints Row does THQ have that sell big? Other big companies can afford to make shovelware because they have multiple big franchises. It has nothing to do with karma anyways, it's called bad business decisions.
Look at what happened to SR3 after SR2. They nerfed SR3 and now are trying to grab more DLC dollars than EA...
Look at Red Faction Guerrilla to RF: Armageddon. Nerfed gameplay to placated a saturated market in order to sell.
Tell me what karma has to do with these?
hmm let me ask this what has take-two made or published first hand that gives him the right to say anything
You know, you could have just been smart and googled the answer to that question, but since you asked...
Look up the catalogue of Rockstar Games (including susidiaries) alone. Take-Two owns Rockstar so ALL of that.
(Red Dead Redemption, GTA, Bully, etc.)
They also own 2K and all of those subsidiaries.
(Bioshock, both of the new XCom games, etc)
Oh, and Fireaxis, they own that too
(All the Sid Meir's games ever)
Quite a few more successes than THQ to say the least.
What point are you trying to prove here?