Team Fortress 2 F2P Ban mod WTH?

Recommended Videos

Kataiser

New member
Apr 16, 2009
23
0
0
Yeah, you'll always find people like that on the internet. I really don't care about F2P or paid or whatever. Everyone can be killed and everyone can try to kill me, so all's fair. I find that the same people that ban F2P players are the people that ban players for winning too hard, and that does happen. It's annoyingly common sometimes...
 

Soraryuu

New member
Aug 16, 2009
59
0
0
Sizzle Montyjing said:
Why exactly, would you want to ban F2P players?
I don't really understand the logic behind that...

Surely after now, they've become skilled enough, right?

Anyway, cue the swarms of people ignoring how unfairly biased this is...
People are just jealous that they got something for free that they themselves had to pay for.
 
Sep 30, 2010
550
0
0
I don't really know why anyone would want to use this and it's bad, unfair, etc. BUT if someone pays for and runs a server then they should be able to run it however they want.
 

alik44

New member
Sep 11, 2010
630
0
0
I believe Extra credits did a show on P2P and F2P relations or at least touched on it.

OP: if this does get a bit out of hand this may ruin the game. (Even though its highly unlikely it would)
 

Savryc

NAPs, Spooks and Poz. Oh my!
Aug 4, 2011
394
0
0
God, gamers are a petty bunch. The things they feel superior about aren't half daft. In TF2 alone there's this F2P nonsense and all that crap about the Cheaters Lament, I remember casually joining a server with that funny little halo I received, took about 3 steps and got booted and banned. Strange, strange people.
 

spazzattack

New member
Mar 25, 2008
94
0
0
There are servers that are entirely based around the trading in TF2. Free-to-Play players are restricted from trading in-game, so it makes sense for these servers to keep certain players from taking up slots other trading players could use. Perhaps some private servers hosted by douches will also apply the mod, but very few will use it overall. Luckily most of the newer players will play on Valve's dedicated servers all the time, which sort of selects them out from people who need more challenge.
 

Zefar

New member
May 11, 2009
485
0
0
The reason they do this is because they are elitist pricks and for some reason they hate newbies.

Kinda like how Dota crowd are generally tearing up newbies who fail at things. Might even ban then if they are bad enough.
 

spazzattack

New member
Mar 25, 2008
94
0
0
The servers that are trade only will kick F2P players because they are not allowed to trade. Maybe some douches will kick F2P's from their private servers, but that is probably also better for the general noob.
 

Sylveria

New member
Nov 15, 2009
1,285
0
0
Just nerds being elitist nerds. The TF2 pros, who look very similar to the southpark kids in the WoW episode, don't want non-pros making them lose games.. cause PVP is serious business.

I think it's more pathetic than outrageous, but for some people having l33t TF2 matches is their only reason for living.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
Sizzle Montyjing said:
Why exactly, would you want to ban F2P players?
I don't really understand the logic behind that...

Surely after now, they've become skilled enough, right?

Anyway, cue the swarms of people ignoring how unfairly biased this is...
People are petty. The sooner you learn this, the more life will make sense.
 

Alexnader

$20 For Steve
May 18, 2009
526
0
0
Sizzle Montyjing said:
Why exactly, would you want to ban F2P players?
I don't really understand the logic behind that...

Surely after now, they've become skilled enough, right?

Anyway, cue the swarms of people ignoring how unfairly biased this is...
The blocking of F2P players isn't so much due to "only wanting to play with pros" and more due to people griefing/hacking via F2P accounts. If you create a steam account for that sole purpose then you have no monetary investment in the account and if it gets banned you lose nothing.

Thus there could well be a higher chance of free players being bad.
 

snagli

New member
Jan 21, 2011
412
0
0
Ban F2P people? That's just silly, it's pretty fun to see them go nuts over being killed by people they "just killed".
 

wordsmith

TF2 Group Admin
May 1, 2008
2,029
0
0
JohnReaper said:
Golan Trevize said:
Yes, it's within the rights of whoever owns a server to choose who he or she wants to play.
I never said that it wasn't, What got me was that they made a mod for the fact of banning someone over if they have paid anything or not, I agree its with the rights for hosts to say "I don't like yourface *ban" its a bit childish but it is their computer and their connection.

My point (If it wasn't clear) was is it right to attack another player of a game on a Metagame scale Recently my friend had to go through 5 FIVE name changes because her old guild pretty much took her name and ran it through barbwire and salt and threatened to do it with any one that played with her. Doesn't the company have some obligation to make sure things like these don't happen? I know its hard but I'm talking things like serverwide smear campaigns, that is activly hindering if not out right preventing the play of their product?

edit: this goes double for games like WoW, I know its fucking huge and you would need something akin to the National Guard to sort through the emails but really, if it comes down to not being provided a service that you have paid for then they should do something

On the F2P side of this though, Yes they have less weight when it comes to "domestic" problems but when I was playing a F2P game I actually spent 50$ because the mods took time to look into my issue (It was a simple game error telling the quest npc I wasn't done because I was a F2Per)
From the way that you're talking, I don't think you know how how TF2 servers work...

No, I don't think it's OK, but ultimately it's the server owner's choice. I'm not sure how you think players can be blackballed and "ran through barbwire". Once a game is over, you leave the server, you don't have to pick a single server and stick to it. You're not locked into a single server like you are with WoW

If the community you're playing with doesn't like F2P's, that's cool. Leave the community and come and play with someone like us [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/chat/The-Escapist-Team-Fortress-2-Group-PC]. We're always welcoming!
 

AngryFrenchCanadian

New member
Dec 4, 2008
428
0
0
Sizzle Montyjing said:
Why exactly, would you want to ban F2P players?
I don't really understand the logic behind that...

Surely after now, they've become skilled enough, right?

Anyway, cue the swarms of people ignoring how unfairly biased this is...
It's biased a fuck, but server owners have the right to ban whoever they want for whatever reason they want. If they can ban people because they're not skilled enough or whatever other reason, they can ban you for being F2P.
 

saxxon.de

New member
Apr 18, 2011
112
0
0
I played TF2 since beta and before F2P the game was slowly starving to death. Now that the F2P folks are here, the game is as lively as it wasn't in a very long time. That's certainly a very good thing, because it means there'll be fun for at least another couple of years.

Everyone not seeing this must be either a massive jerk or a jackass.

That said, it's every server owners right to decide who's allowed to play on the server and who's not. Smear Campaigns as you call them, Mr. oder Mrs. JohnReaper, on the other hand are always and in every circumstance, videogame or not, a testament to being an idiot.
 

Gralian

Me, I'm Counting
Sep 24, 2008
1,789
0
0
TotalBiscuit already covered this. I'm not going to bother finding his Daily Mailbox that had the specific question regarding his thoughts on the matter, but suffice it to say he did explain that (as many others have said before) it's within the rights of the owners of the server to make whatever rules they wish. It isn't up to you and the onus isn't on them to make things fair. They pay for the server, not you. It's not like there's a shortage of servers out there. So 10% have a no F2Player rule. So what. Hardly earth shattering when you consider the large amount of servers and players out there. Not only that, but he went on to say that there is a very noticeable difference between people who have been playing since its retail release and those who have only just joined as part of the influx of F2Players. I don't really play it myself but from what i gather the general gist of it is that they tend to play more poorly, can be somewhat obnoxious and generally drag the experience down for the whole team. People can get a bit self-entitled when something is F2P and either forget, are unaware or outright don't care for any consequences for their behaviour - see the apparently abysmal League of Legends community for an example of this.

Sizzle Montyjing said:
Why exactly, would you want to ban F2P players?
I don't really understand the logic behind that...

Surely after now, they've become skilled enough, right?
You know F2Players aren't a static value, right? They didn't just join several months ago and are now as a 'community' on par with paid players. There's always new F2Players joining, so the level of experience varies dramatically and is constantly changing with so many people on varying levels of play constantly joining and leaving the game. Yes, you may get that with paid players who rarely play it despite having bought it, but it's just never going to be on the same level as people who just decide to dabble in it for shits and giggles because it's free.

arragonder said:
Golan Trevize said:
Yes, it's within the rights of whoever owns a server to choose who he or she wants to play.
actually the F2P ban mod (which I downloaded to read through the source, it's literally 3 lines not counting comments XD)is a really gray area since it's implemented using steam tools which is sketchy. it doesn't outright break any rules it's just shady if you're a big believer in EULAs.
And what does being a "big believer" in the EULA mean, exactly? Because from what i understand, the EULA is an incredibly loose and outright shady set of terms in and of itself. Like EA's recent debacle surrounding the inclusion of "if you use our service you aren't allowed to sue us, but at the same time this service is the only way you can play our games!". Fact is, people have been constantly skirting the EULA for quite some time now and that goes for both sides of the fence. Technically, people on WoW shouldn't be modding. Or at the very least, shouldn't mod skin textures, but they do it anyway. Hundreds, probably even thousands, do it. Blizzard doesn't seem to mind half as much as they'd have you believe. EA tries to infringe on your consumer rights by making you declare you can't sue them for any reason and that they can take any information they like about your computer. The point being that honestly, there's no way anyone could hands-up say that they were a "big believer" in any sort of EULA, be they corporations or consumers. Both sides get equally fucked over. But it's a matter of que sera sera, at the end of the day.

OP: hyperbole much? the thing about private servers is that they're PRIVATE and all this bitching and moaning only serves to vindicate people that run this mod, I certainly wouldn't want anyone this whiny to play with me
Just to reiterate my earlier point: Pretty much this. It's the self-entitled whining that people want to get away from. "The world should cater to ME. How DARE they decide to actively exclude me! There's hundreds of other servers i could go to instead, but no, i want to play HERE. Rabble rabble principles god damnit!"
 

Prof. Monkeypox

New member
Mar 17, 2010
1,014
0
0
This behavior is:
A) Well within the rights of whoever owns/operates the server and thus is fair
B) A pretty huge dick move by a bunch of over-entitled twats
 

thelonewolf266

New member
Nov 18, 2010
708
0
0
You must be one of those people that think the console community sucks but everybody that plays PC is a saint.Welcome to the real world.
 

Ninonybox_v1legacy

New member
Apr 2, 2008
1,973
0
0
This is just bloody ridiculous, its just cutting the fanbase in half and deterring potential micro transactions from fans who feel unwelcome, successfully taking profit away from valve. But as for me personally I have never been so happy to have spent money before in my life, I won't have to deal with the crap F2P players have to deal with. Sorry whoever Is stuck with this kind of backlash, truly.