Excellent!Timbydude said:I just absolutely love this. Team Meat has proven their awesomeness.
Even better, though, is how they trolled the angry PETA supporters who got offended by the lightbulb joke: http://twitpic.com/3c542r
So how many animal lives equate to one human life?SinisterGehe said:Without animal testing, my brother and 16/20 cousins would be dead.
same i gotta get this game now, i wonder if this was all a marketing stunt?Kouen said:This is so awesome it made me want Super Meat Boy!
Lets hope the fight continues! I Love my LOL'z
Because lets face it, PETA couldn't keep there mouth shut if an animal's life depended on it!
(See what I did there?)
I imagine that ratio to be really really skewed towards humans. What with the amount of bacterium our bodies destroy on a daily basis to ensure our continued survival. Or do bacteria not count because they aren't cute enough?EllEzDee said:So how many animal lives equate to one human life?SinisterGehe said:Without animal testing, my brother and 16/20 cousins would be dead.
This is the icing on an excellent meaty cake. Nice find!Timbydude said:Even better, though, is how they trolled the angry PETA supporters who got offended by the lightbulb joke: http://twitpic.com/3c542r
Agreed. I haven't slept in over 24 hours, as I'm laboring over a project for college that's due in about 7 hours now. That line kept me going right as I was about to just give up.WrongSprite said:Excellent!Timbydude said:I just absolutely love this. Team Meat has proven their awesomeness.
Even better, though, is how they trolled the angry PETA supporters who got offended by the lightbulb joke: http://twitpic.com/3c542r
"Because they are ugly and smell bad" made me laugh my ass off, and I'm not someone who laughs easily.
As many as are necessary. I'm not joking or trolling, and I abhor unnecessary pain or suffering being inflicted on animals, but if it was necessary to brutally slaughter hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of animals in order to provide a safe drug which would save even a single human life, it would be entirely justifiable. The simple fact of the matter is that computer simulations won't be capable of emulation to the required degree for at least another decade, perhaps longer, so in the meantime animal testing is AOK by me.EllEzDee said:So how many animal lives equate to one human life?SinisterGehe said:Without animal testing, my brother and 16/20 cousins would be dead.
Still, i hope the real Super Meat Boy is better than the flash ripoff at peta. Part of me died while playing that.
You should have bought that game anyway because of how mind blowingly fun it is. I have had this game for 1 day and I have racked up over 10 hours of playtime.mac_705 said:thats awesome, i might buy that game now
Agreed. It should be considered, in the end, it hasn't saved a single human, it's saved millions. I will gladly kill thousands of animals to help the 170 MILLION-odd sufferers worldwide. If we find a means of reliably testing drugs in an artificial environment, fantastic, until then however...sosolidshoe said:As many as are necessary. I'm not joking or trolling, and I abhor unnecessary pain or suffering being inflicted on animals, but if it was necessary to brutally slaughter hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of animals in order to provide a safe drug which would save even a single human life, it would be entirely justifiable. The simple fact of the matter is that computer simulations won't be capable of emulation to the required degree for at least another decade, perhaps longer, so in the meantime animal testing is AOK by me.EllEzDee said:So how many animal lives equate to one human life?SinisterGehe said:Without animal testing, my brother and 16/20 cousins would be dead.
Still, i hope the real Super Meat Boy is better than the flash ripoff at peta. Part of me died while playing that.
snip