Well not only are you "saying that" in a pretty ridiculous manner, and context, but in this case you're completely incorrect. Your point, if you actually managed to read the article, which so many people on this moronic forum have clearly failed to do, is that the 50 people "rated" and abused racially and physically should not appear attractive to the person that made the list.rated said:Im not defending the guy at all Im just saying that if u give some one fuel dont be upset when they start a fire
You've no evidence he made the list for reasons you're implying he did; in fact the opposite is apparently true, the sources quoted state he made the list because the people on it were "leaders", either in areas of authority within the school or the like; hence his cry "Women will take over the world" etc.