Teen Arrested for Home-Made "Hot or Not" List on Facebook

Chrysocollus

Wandering Umbrella Fiend
Sep 7, 2009
56
0
0
I wrote a huuuuge post...so I broke it up into spoiler tags to break it up and hopefully make it digestible.

To those of you saying that this is no big deal:
I suppose you could argue survival of the fittest. There are times when I'm inclined to agree, but this is not one. There is no question that what he did was wrong. I also don't like the idea of someone saying "this person was weak because s/he killed him/herself because someone insulted him/her." Anyone who says that doesn't understand there are deeper problems at work, more than just the one insult.

And...anyone who says that doesn't know - or perhaps has forgotten, or become wrathful instead of compassionate - what it's like to be alone, isolated. It's a terrible feeling, one that no one deserves to feel, and definitely not while in the awful cesspit that is so much of middle/high school. One that's, unfortunately, not always endurable.
In addition to what I said about those people not knowing what it's like to be alone, I'd like to argue this from a purely beneficial-to-society view: the woman that lost confidence in herself may now never make to society the contribution that she may have made before. All for a cheap laugh. So all I have to ask about that is?
Hell, even to RISK that outcome, is it worth it?

You might argue that people need to be hardened, to grow a thick skin, and certainly with the realities of the world it helps. It's especially crucial when dealing with constructive criticism, because without that thick skin you will not grow from it. However, this is not constructive. No one was bettered by this experience-- the perpetrator of the list included. The women were not bettered by this list in any way, they were publically humiliated, and there's no one that grows in a good way due to that. The list-maker was positively reinforced for objectifying and publically humiliating women, which only reinforces the ideas he very obviously has about women. Now he is going to be tried, and worst-case scenario he is going to go to jail, to be not only objectified but subjected to the dehumanization reserved for those we determine have violated laws enough to be removed from society. Even if he doesn't go to jail, which I hope he doesn't, he still has this three-month (?) ? not sure if it's three months, but a length of time nonetheless - where police are poking their noses into his business, treating him as a criminal.

That is poetic justice in a sense-the one who objectified is now being objectified - but I disagree with that as a proper solution. He is not going to learn that objectifying women is wrong from this, unless by some miracle the police are willing to recognize the true problem and teach the kid some compassion.

Call me embittered and jaded, but I doubt that's going to happen.

I'm actually rather sad the school expelled him-they had the chance to do some real good. Although they obviously failed in some way because this still happened in the first place. If they could have taught him why it's so wrong to objectify women, why it's so wrong to reduce a person to a scale of numbers, and then had him make amends-that would have been true progress. This would not only have changed him, but those assholes that cheered him for this list.

The arrest upsets me, not because it's a gross overreaction, but because it doesn't fix anything. There's obviously an underlying problem - not just in this school but in this damn topic too - that, in society's subconscious, it's still okay to treat women as less than men.
It's not okay to treat anyone as less than anyone.

This case is-terrible. The punishment does not fit the crime. Even the expulsion doesn't change anything. It tells him that it was wrong - but he is human, and lacking a compelling moral reason why, that will not affect any change.

Sigh. The entire situation is awful. All I can hope is that we can all collectively look at this and learn-that the teachers of this school will look at this incident and try to instill better values by leading by example-that maybe someone will look at this and reflect upon themselves and think about the morality of objectifying, and what it means to take someone's humanity away from them-that the courts will look at this case and, instead of dismissing the kid as just a kid, instead of looking at the kid as a criminal, see the true problem here and, god willing, find some way to teach him why.

I may as well be shouting in the middle of a desert, for the likelihood anyone will read this whole thing; goes double for anyone actually getting anything out of this. But for that one person in the middle of the desert with an open mind, here it is.

I don't know where you people get the idea that everyone goes about systematically making a list ranking people based purely on superficial features. Anyone that goes through that sort of effort, I'd seriously consider recommending them see some sort of psychologist. I'd like to see this kid put into some sort of counseling. Maybe then he'd be taught something. Sorry, wandered from my point. I've never really ranked anyone beyond "ooh, he looks nice" or "man, she's kinda hot". And yes, I've been through high school. Knowing people from every "clique"?every person deserves to be treated as a person.

And?yes. That?sometimes becomes troublesome when searching for porn, I admit. ._. The whole "you objectify people to jerk off to them" point?yeah. No fun.

No, I don't think this would be more okay if it was a woman who had published a list about 50 men. Men can have their feelings hurt just as much as women, even if society conditions them to hide it better. An athletic, beautiful, talented, honor-student man is to be mourned as much as an equivalent woman if, for some reason, they are dehumanized for a cheap laugh.

Final note. Someone that just criticized others for spending ridiculous amount of time on a list based on superficial appearances just spend a ridiculous amount of time making a forum post. I am aware, yes, thank you.

Apologies for the odd ? floating around, the transition from word to forum post is not always smooth. :)
 

DeathWyrmNexus

New member
Jan 5, 2008
1,143
0
0
Father Time said:
AnteGravity said:
This pretty much demonstrates why Feminism is still strongly needed in Western society. Treating young girls like grades of meat and rating them on their sexual characteristics like it was the only thing they would ever be worth is so grotesquely abhorrent.

It definitely warrants legal action. This idiot caused a great deal of grievous mental and emotional anguish on so many of these girls publicly. That kind of behavior can not be condoned by any authority that hopes to remain credible.
So you really want to sue anyone who hurts peoples feelings (on purpose)?

It's been done (I think).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
Also have to wonder what it tells society of feminine strength. "If anybody says something you don't like, we'll come and arrest them for you, little lady."
 

DeathWyrmNexus

New member
Jan 5, 2008
1,143
0
0
Father Time said:
DeathWyrmNexus said:
Father Time said:
AnteGravity said:
This pretty much demonstrates why Feminism is still strongly needed in Western society. Treating young girls like grades of meat and rating them on their sexual characteristics like it was the only thing they would ever be worth is so grotesquely abhorrent.

It definitely warrants legal action. This idiot caused a great deal of grievous mental and emotional anguish on so many of these girls publicly. That kind of behavior can not be condoned by any authority that hopes to remain credible.
So you really want to sue anyone who hurts peoples feelings (on purpose)?

It's been done (I think).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
Also have to wonder what it tells society of feminine strength. "If anybody says something you don't like, we'll come and arrest them for you, little lady."
Exactly my thoughts. Everyone here is painting these women as delicate flowers who can't handle this and who may collapse into a fetal position and cry for 4 days over this.

Granted this is going way too far.
Ya, I actually support suspension and/or expulsion for shit like this. It is a special kind of asshole to pass that around and post it. However, it isn't a criminal issue and never was and never should be. These girls don't need a white knight. They need somebody to reassure them not to take the words of a prick to heart, they are still kids after all thus need reassurance from time to time. And the prick needs a proverbial ass beating, not a Miranda reading.
 

Leadfinger

New member
Apr 21, 2010
293
0
0
Jail is to good for this kid. He should be hung, then drawn and quartered, burnt at the stake, and his ashes scattered to the four winds. That will teach him not to indulge in free speech.
 

mooncalf

<Insert Avatar Here>
Jul 3, 2008
1,164
0
0
Bek359 said:
Isn't this how Zuckerberg first started Facebook?
The movie portrayed him doing something akin to it, but that was before the facebook idea came up.

Pissing off 50 people with the added dimensions of their concerned parents seems like utter stupidity to me. But I don't think being an obnoxious twat is necessarily criminal, either, so why the court involvement?

Perhaps his behaviour does at worst label him a bully, but in that case I'd sooner punch him out once than get the police involved.
 

Aethren

New member
Jun 6, 2009
1,063
0
0
He's makin' a list...

And checkin' it twice...

Gonna find out if you're naughty or nice...
 

Maddudeguy

New member
Jun 8, 2009
47
0
0
Bit over the top being arrested then having charges filed against him, couldn't they have just given him a rap on the knuckles, got him to apologize and sent him on his way?
 

RSparowe

New member
Apr 25, 2011
29
0
0
kogane said:
Littlee300 said:
Anarien said:
isn't this all a bit much for a stupid high school stunt?

A "stupid high school stunt"? Are you serious? Falling on your ass because you tried to ride a bike down some stairs qualifies as a "stupid high school stunt".

This was a calculated attack on adolescent females in a disgusting manner that showed no regard for their well-being or reputation.This was exploitation of minors, sexist, misogynist bullying and defamation. This kid got off way too lightly.
You must of had a hella' good life if you consider this bad and haven't came to accept that humans act like this or given up on humanity.
Whe you see humans I only see stupid men who want to show women their place, but I guess whatever works for you.
Stop oppressing me!

(See what I did there?)
 

sheogoraththemad

New member
Feb 6, 2010
921
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
According to reports, after distributing the list at his former school the student addressed an "impromptu gathering" of cheering students, during which he danced around and warned that "women are the future, unless we stop them now."
He danced around and... what's going on in this kid's head?
 

RSparowe

New member
Apr 25, 2011
29
0
0
sheogoraththemad said:
Andy Chalk said:
According to reports, after distributing the list at his former school the student addressed an "impromptu gathering" of cheering students, during which he danced around and warned that "women are the future, unless we stop them now."
He danced around and... what's going on in this kid's head?
You have to remember that this is an editorial of a report. Basically, the third-hand wording of somebody's opinion about what was happening. I doubt there was literal dancing, but it adds to the sensational(ist) undertone of the story.
 

Jaime_Wolf

New member
Jul 17, 2009
1,194
0
0
Someone's seen the Social Network.

That said, arrest seems a bit much for an idiot high school kid. Are we really to expect that some loser calling people names has offended high school-aged girls seriously enough to warrant arrest?

To clarify, I'm not saying it was okay or that he doesn't deserve punishment, but why on earth would you involve the police in something like this?
 

The Cheezy One

Christian. Take that from me.
Dec 13, 2008
1,912
0
0
From what I have learned from posts and replies, what he was done is completely ok.

WHAT? HOW IS IT OK TO OFFEND, INSULT AND POSSIBLY SCAR PEOPLE???

Responses:

If it's a large school, then it will barely concern well over half the student body.
So because only X% of people will care, its ok?

What? Free speech still applies. If the KKK can go around spewing their bullshit, why can't this kid?
So because it's legal to offend and insult, it's ok to do so?

it happens EVERY DAY
This is NOT an excuse, and yet it is one of the most vocal responses I have seen. Every day, many people are murdered. Can I kill your family? No. Because it is wrong and immoral.

if this one little thing affects them that much, then they are in for a world of hurt when they reach the real world.
This implies that they were like this before the events of this guy. Maybe they will be affected by litle things more because of this, and not vice versa? Cause and effect. What does not kill you does not always make you stronger. It can wear away at you.

Maybe I'm just being naive, but we can't write off definite issues because worse things happen elsewhere, or it's not worth the time. From that perspective, nothing is worth anything, so why do we have police at all? And stop quoting freedom of speech. This is harrasment, not some journalist trying to spread the truth about a corrupt politician.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
Iron Lightning said:
Yes, a judge can order you to stop and pay restitution in a civil court, but it's not a criminal offense.
Didn't say it was a "criminal" offense. But it is an offense that our legal system recognizes as wrong and intervenes to correct. It is illegal, but not criminally so. You're simply drawing a distinction that I am not, and shooting down that particular distinction. It is in no way a form of protected speech. If you're saying "defamation" and "protected speech" in the same sentence, you're incorrect. Unless that sentence includes a well-placed "not."

(I'm speaking, of course, about within the American legal system, where this event took place)

This is unlike beating a kid for saying "She has great boobs" which is very clearly assault (i.e. a criminal offense.) I'm sure that you do not support assault as a reaction to having your feelings hurt. Please be more careful with your examples in the future.
I didn't say the kid was legally required to be beaten. I didn't say that it would be kosher. I did, however, say the kid--in my opinion--deserves a beating. There's a difference between "hurting someone's feelings" and doing real and severe damage to their emotional well-being through slander. You underestimate how cruel kids can be, and how destructive something like this can be to a teenage girl. This one I'm not arguing from a legal standpoint. I just feel that what this kid did to some of these girls is vile.
 

willsham45

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,130
0
0
Ok I was going to right this off as a Fuck not another over reaction my police like I seam to hear all the time to the point I am thinking why do we let this happen next time it could be me doing nothing bigt and then getting arrested for some stupid arbatory reason.

If it was just on facebook I would think this is over the top. With him giving out fliers Its a little worce although it is essnetally the same. Being told off is ok but arrested come on he did nothing wrong, he was just an ideat. Its ok to shun him although it does not sound like that is possable with this kid. But What he did should and I don't think is an arrestable offence, I can see why it might piss people off but some people are dicks and some of those dicks are kids live with it.