Dunno about him getting arrested, but the little shit deserved something, at any rate. Maybe this'll scare the douchebag out of him.
Comparisons to slavery provide strong rhetoric, but they also reduce the credibility of your argument. It's also a serious issue with the gay rights movement.zeldagirl said:Dr Snakeman said:I'm sorry, but the word "slut" is not "oppressive". It's an unkind, gender-specific derogatory term for a promiscuous woman. It's wrong to talk that way about someone, but it is not the kind of hate speech that you seem to be suggesting.ViaGalactica said:Epic, butthurt snip
"Slut" is not "oppressive"? Really now? It's used to shame women from being proud of their sexuality. You as a man do not have any right to tell women what they can or cannot determine is oppressive - you are not the one being oppressed!
I am not sure why, but this part really made me laugh.Andy Chalk said:According to reports, after distributing the list at his former school the student addressed an "impromptu gathering" of cheering students, during which he danced around and warned that "women are the future, unless we stop them now."
Sad but true. Especially as the same is not used for guys. There was a guy in college referred to as a "Man Whore" which, even when used, was made to sound more like a compliment than an insult, both by guys and girls.zeldagirl said:"Slut" is not "oppressive"? Really now? It's used to shame women from being proud of their sexuality.
A) sexism =/= slanderHive Mind said:The student printed th list out and handed it out to everyone in the school, before then parading around shouting sexist remarks. He committed slander. A crime.O maestre said:i see no crime here... what the hell happened to freedom of speach the internet has so much more bile than this hormonal teenagers insignificant list. ridiculous...
Read the article, not just the header.
Because it's satire, which is protected as free speech. It's meant as a joke, and you got it. Congratulations. You have a sense of humor, unlike most of the humorless fuckbags who've been commenting so far.Legion said:I am not sure why, but this part really made me laugh.Andy Chalk said:According to reports, after distributing the list at his former school the student addressed an "impromptu gathering" of cheering students, during which he danced around and warned that "women are the future, unless we stop them now."
subtlefuge said:Comparisons to slavery provide strong rhetoric, but they also reduce the credibility of your argument. It's also a serious issue with the gay rights movement.zeldagirl said:Dr Snakeman said:I'm sorry, but the word "slut" is not "oppressive". It's an unkind, gender-specific derogatory term for a promiscuous woman. It's wrong to talk that way about someone, but it is not the kind of hate speech that you seem to be suggesting.ViaGalactica said:Epic, butthurt snip
"Slut" is not "oppressive"? Really now? It's used to shame women from being proud of their sexuality. You as a man do not have any right to tell women what they can or cannot determine is oppressive - you are not the one being oppressed!
Internalized misogyny. Women are taught that slut is an insult, and they call each other that. I hate that, and don't think it makes it right.Legion said:Which reminds me of something, girls call other girls sluts too, which is very strange. Then again, girls always seem nastier to other girls than guys are.
Your logic and reason has no place in this court case based on emotions and feelings.Xzi said:That's definitely taking it too far. Expulsion from school is more than enough. What law did he actually break here? None, unless they bend the law to the point of near-breaking. Was it a dumb and hateful thing to do? Sure, but the police and court system should not be involved in any way.
Yeah, because it's not like girls have EVER made a list about guys attractiveness. Nope, not once.AnteGravity said:This pretty much demonstrates why Feminism is still strongly needed in Western society. Treating young girls like grades of meat and rating them on their sexual characteristics like it was the only thing they would ever be worth is so grotesquely abhorrent.
It definitely warrants legal action. This idiot caused a great deal of grievous mental and emotional anguish on so many of these girls publicly. That kind of behavior can not be condoned by any authority that hopes to remain credible.
was going to say, this is ironic considering that a hot or not list was more or less the origin of Facebook.Bek359 said:Isn't this how Zuckerberg first started Facebook?
Translation:The father of one of the girls who appeared on the list said he was pleased that the kid was arrested but expressed concern that a disorderly conduct charge was inadequate for a "very serious offense that affected many people." Nonetheless, he added, "I'm gratified that the investigation continued, and that charges are being filed. I'm hopeful they consider additional charges as they gather more evidence."
I agree with you that "Sexual Harassment" would make much more sense but you forget, "Young impressionable children's feelings got hurt. Oh the psychological damage, oh the privacy invasions, drama, Drama, DRAMA!"zeldagirl said:My biggest problem with what has happened is what he is being charged with - disorderly conduct is a stretch. Sexual harassment, however, is obviously what has happened here. And yes, there are sexual harassment laws that would protect these women.