Tanis said:
I REALLY hope that's a joke.
Because 'deleting' a character, due to some anons bitching on a forum...
All that shows is the developers being an idiot with NO spine.
Why is this spineless? Harada is apparently removing a character in US, sure, but he's also apparently going to be
adding a replacement character. A male beefcake for generalization points, but Harada is apparently willing to put in the work to (because of
our bitching and moaning) replace a character for the US, despite established plans.
If it's anything, stupid, childish, whatever; it's a bit far from spineless. Tekken 7 isn't being cancelled over the outcry, neither is it being cancelled in the US over the outcry (which is at least a bit more likely a scenario; clear dislike from foreign markets were displayed here, so why bother with the cost of localization/distribution?). Devs have done sillier things in similar scenarios; just look at Phil Fish's developer status.
And unless you think devs should just ignore consumer feedback (that they don't construe), you probably don't want to implicate 'anons bitching on a forum'. You and I both are virtually indistinguishable to a developer on a project timeline; we're ALL anons (unless you want to pull out your distinguishing credentials now). If Harada's response wasn't to your liking, then we had, if not responsibility, then the capability to cull the dumb outcry that caused this scenario in the first place. Because he DID make an apparent decision on the outcry, whether you were pleased by it or not.
Way I see it, we have three choices in considering developer-consumer communication:
-Consider our perspective negligible (in light of trolls and whiners)
-If we consider our perspective worth a damn, take responsibility in culling trolls and whiners, or
-If we consider our perspective worth a damn, distinguish our communities from the ones trolls and whiners reside in