I was gonna mention Primary Colours for the "presidential staffer" one, but I think someone's already pointed it out.
This has been done. multiple times. not done well, but its been done."An idealistic campaign staffer for a popular Presidential candidate has their idealism shaken to the core when it is discovered that the candidate, while still a sincere proponent of all the causes and policies that led the staffer to join the campaign in the first place, has committed various moral indiscretions that violate the staffer's personal code of right and wrong. After a dark period of deep, introspective soul searching ... the staffer decides to continue supporting the candidate anyway - because this is the real world where a leader's 'niceness' or 'good intentions' don't mean jack squat if they're going to support wrongheaded policies."
Ong bak 1 is this. well he doesnt really sell the artifact but the rest is correct."When crooked thieves steal an ancient religious artifact from a primitive rural village, their greatest warrior must travel for the first time to the strange and unfamiliar world of The Big City to retrieve it. He fights many, many elaborate battles and succeeds in locating and defeating the sinister thieves, but ultimately does not bring back The Artifact. Instead, he discovers that in 'The Big City' people do not die constantly from common germs and minor injuries as they do in his primitive rural village on account of having access to modern medicine, health-standards and communication. He then sells the damn artifact at a huge profit so as to bring life saving medicine, superior farming equipment, food and a phone/internet connection to his people."
Actually, yes we were victimized by "them" beforehand, everyone victimized everyone else. It was western, white, civilization that wound up putting an end to this kind of thing. Your basic arguement is that the thousands of years of slavery before the US shouldn't count because it's inconveinent to your arguement, and the simple fact that it was white civilization that ended slavery runs counter to what you want to believe... and there are a lot of people just like you, there is a whole political power block based around exactly that kind of ignorance which makes it difficult to unravel.Closet Superhero said:[
'We' didn't do anything. 'We' weren't victimised by 'them' before 'we' enslaved 'them'. The issue is that, RIGHT HERE AND NOW we live in an unequal society, with the determinants of that inequality being strongly associated with race. And the question is, why is that the case? Is it because some races are better than others? Or is it because of historical circumstances? If you're not racist, it is obviously that latter, and the issue becomes: how do we redress the problem. That is 'OUR' problem and our responsibility, and the abolishment of slavery does not diminish that responsibility. The Abolishment was just words anyway; it didn't magically make black and white people socially or economically equal.
Words are the easy part. So let's not congratulate ourselves too much. Besides, don't the glorious principles of freedom and equality get plenty of celebration as is? So what exactly are you complaining about, again?
Agreed, though I liked The Protector (Tom Yung Gong) more.ascorbius said:I love the Ong Bak one at the end. Although it's probably unfair to use that movie as the base for the joke as it's A: Not a Hollywood movie, B: A spectacular action showpiece and C: Really good.