Ten Movies That Will Never Be

lastjustice

New member
Jun 29, 2004
132
0
0
Bob, Does someone need to send some minorities over to your house to kick your ass and rob you so you can get over your white guilt, as then someone of race finnally wronged you properly, and you can just treat them even handed as you get the big picture everyone gets screwed of all walks of life?(no, I don't actually want anyone to harm Bob, it's merely a hyperbole to make a point.) Perhaps may be you can give away bunch of your money to some poor people in another country, because you must have really had a major silver spoon to be this delusional. As a poor short white kid who grew up heavily hispanic neighborhood, and got my ass kicked for being white,some guy tried force himself on me and tons of other crazy crap. I've seen plenty of adversity(Likely far more than you have Bob, and yet I don't say 90s suck heh.I think I'm only stronger for having made thru it all , and can understand people who faced what i have or worse.) and being white hasn't been some magical easy button. I don't share your views. Life screws everyone if you let it and it's only when you choose to be master of your own destiny can you rise above it, regardless of your starting hand in life. If you believe otherwise you've already lost.

Yes white people are the majority, and Hollywood makes movies about them alot. Damn Hollywood for giving their target audience what they want and trying make money while not going out of their way to offend anyone on purpose most the time. It's called a business and they like money. I mean for guy who made Overthinker number #23 on race you'd already known that I'd assumed.

Most these suggestions(A)Are not particularly funny if you were aimming for satire. (B)Are not insightful, you're really preaching to the choir. You just come across as ignorant the people you throw stones at, just in a different way. (C) Wouldn't even make a good movie as they lack conflict as others pointed out. Just hey look they're not white or stereotype. That isn't a story. Given your laughable name scheme for your villains in the overthinker videos, I see creativity and imagination aren't your strong suit. (D) Just make you look like one of the noobtards you talked about in your big picture about being PC. Hey look I'm mocking things in a completely tasteless manner, but you shouldn't be offended because I'm Moviebob.

Bob you really are starting sound more and more like the things you claim to hate. It will cost you fans if you keep it up long enough.
 

Birthe

New member
Apr 26, 2010
73
0
0
Well have to say while most of them do seem to have interesting idea in it, there often is really somekind of conflict or something missing.

I kinda like the last idea though. cause you can have all the ficts in it with a kind of cool and satisfying ending.
 

CommanderKirov

New member
Oct 3, 2010
762
0
0
The thing is. Noone would ever watch such movies because it's life around us.

Who would ever want to pay whatever money to watch it in film theater if you can just TURN ON THE NEWS. Or perhaps TALK TO YOUR FRIENDS about THEIR LIVES.

Well perhaps besides the first one. That one was quite nice.
 

cyber95

New member
Feb 28, 2008
107
0
0
What the people arguing "It's satire!" don't get is that most of us understand what he's trying to satirize. It just isn't funny, and comes off as preachy and pretentious instead. If it was a satire on how terrible the cliched premises would be subverted, then... well he would have failed there too because it's not really possible to tell that's what he was making fun of.
 

Pandaman1911

Fuzzy Cuddle Beast
Jan 3, 2011
601
0
0
Gee, Bob, you seem somewhat bent out of shape at something. What ever could it be? I can only hazard a guess.
 

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
Most sound really funny although the science one would be reeeeeeeally boring. "Im gonna cure canzer" "U crazy" "I did et" "Ooh ok". The last one sounds awesome though, and the upper middle class one is RIGHT on the money. Im not working in no damn office for the rest of my life but thats no excuse for taking it out on others who like that sort of thing.
 

ascorbius

Numberwanger
Nov 18, 2009
263
0
0
I love the Ong Bak one at the end. Although it's probably unfair to use that movie as the base for the joke as it's A: Not a Hollywood movie, B: A spectacular action showpiece and C: Really good.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Well, the problem here Bob is that SOME but not all of those ideas represent your own political viewpoint and scewed, somewhat naive view of the world and what you want to believe. The set ups do not work because they try and deal with real issues, BUT do so in a fashion that is itself totally detached from reality.

A good example of this would be your comments about the civil rights movement in the US. Your correct in so far as movies like "The Help" being fairly obnoxious in their portrayal, but at the heart of the matter is the simple fact that the civil rights movement happened because of white people. Blacks did NOT decide "we've had enough" rise up, and take these freedoms... if they had tried that would have ended with a lot of dead black people. Rather what happened was white people decided that like with slavery. that this was wrong according to our changing moral codes and decided to do away with these things. Whites were the ones who have blacks the abillity to represent themselves and got things moving. What's more the desicians made to seriouslty change things in the end were made by whites and given to the blacks, as opposed to taken. This is incidently why guys like "Marin Luthor King Jr." are great men, when the movement got going he was smart enough to realize what was actually going on, whose desicians it ultimatly was, and that he needed to convince white people to keep going along this moral path. This in comparison to the "well they are starting to give us some freedom, let's get nasty and try and force things" "Malcolm X" type logic.

Now granted, from a black perspective it's far more flattering to think "we took this" as opposed to "we were given it" just as it's easier to think of whites as the bad guys who were slavers (forgetting their own ethnic history and how long they were slavers of white people for an even longer period of time), as opposed to the ethnicity that ended slavery.

See, while you might not see it, it strikes me as being a situation where white guys have become stock villains in many of these pieces to begin with, and I personally have a bit of a problem with that. All sarcasm about "thank god for white people", seems to miss the point that if you REALLY want to break thigns down ethnically we pretty much are the ones who brought about the current moral system that has more people living in peace and more tolerance than ever before in history. While "The Help" does a very bad job of making this point, it's fundementally correct. What's more I think trying to downplay the role of whites in this kind of issue is going to do nothing but lead to more tensions, and that was kind of the point of guys like "Martin Luthor King Jr."

All sarcasm aside, I've felt there should actually be a "thank you white people" week as part of things like "Black History Month" as a reminder of tolerance and to limit all the "Black Powah" stuff (hopefully), by making it very clear that a lot of what blacks have happened because whites decided it was right to give it to them. Slavery would never had ended if whites never changed their mind about it. The Civil Liberties movement would never had succeeded if whites didn't decide it was right. We aren't the bad guys, and were ultimatly crucial to all of this.

This same logic can apply in a similar way to those other points. Like it or not America is not only the dominant world power, but pretty much what defined modern civilization. While various nations try and take credit for inventions of people that were born there, the truth is a lot of these people had to come to the US for the enviroment to create their inventions. We're also the ones who were largely responsible for the proliferation and further development of things that were not invented here. Like everything, there are exceptions, but we didn't just gradually become central to the world in some tragic cosmic fluke.

While this very much might change, the world kind of does revolve around America for the moment and has for a while. As has been said, we've done more to conquer the world with Starbucks and The Big Mac than previous empires have done with guns, bombs, and the military.

Right now your not seeing much in the way of movies dealing with other cultures doing things without the US being involved, because as the dominant world power we're involved in pretty much everything, and our opinion matters especially seeing as we love to put on our cowboy hat and go rushing in to support whomever we think are the good guys irregardless of the repercussions. Even a little war is going to have the players thinking "what does the US think about this" especially in today's world of nearly instantaneous communications. If there is anything of value at stake that could potentially concern us, even if it's just a moral principle, we're going to have groups like the CIA involved. If we're dealing with a fight between a couple of third world nations full of reprehensible people, well as often as not we're going to have our fingers in that too, perhaps even having started the war to weaken both groups in promotion of our interests.

Really war movies not involving America are going to take place before America was a world power, but then involve the dominant world power of the time. Such "period pieces" can be pretty popular. They involve groups like The British Empire replacing US involvement. While I might be forgetting something I don't believe there has been a single American involved in any of the "Pirates Of The Carribean" movies as one high profile example of this. This is to say nothing of various early history pieces involving Greece or Rome, retelling the story of King-Arthur, and other things. Then of course we have kung-fu movies which while produced overseas are oftentimes distributed by US owned companies to the western market due to the demand for them.

The big point where I do agree with you though is that I think people need to approach the issue of technological development from a perspective other than a thematic re-telling of "Frakenstein". I've commented that we need more "Reed Richard" and less "Misguided Scientist" of course I think with the proliferation of comic book movies we're sseeing this slowly developing. While there as a dark side of science represented, if you look at "Iron Man" and "Captain America", the science involved ultimatly wound up becoming a force of good as opposed to needing to be stopped due to "playing god".
 

Closet Superhero

New member
May 24, 2009
43
0
0
Therumancer said:
All sarcasm aside, I've felt there should actually be a "thank you white people" week as part of things like "Black History Month" as a reminder of tolerance and to limit all the "Black Powah" stuff (hopefully), by making it very clear that a lot of what blacks have happened because whites decided it was right to give it to them.
Oh, my. I'd like to think the absurdity of that suggestion speaks for itself.

On topic:

Most of those 'pitches' sound boring. Mainly because most of them have no story in them, just a character.
 

Samurai Goomba

New member
Oct 7, 2008
3,679
0
0
Therumancer said:
All sarcasm aside, I've felt there should actually be a "thank you white people" week as part of things like "Black History Month" as a reminder of tolerance and to limit all the "Black Powah" stuff (hopefully), by making it very clear that a lot of what blacks have happened because whites decided it was right to give it to them. Slavery would never had ended if whites never changed their mind about it. The Civil Liberties movement would never had succeeded if whites didn't decide it was right. We aren't the bad guys, and were ultimatly crucial to all of this.

This same logic can apply in a similar way to those other points. Like it or not America is not only the dominant world power, but pretty much what defined modern civilization. While various nations try and take credit for inventions of people that were born there, the truth is a lot of these people had to come to the US for the enviroment to create their inventions. We're also the ones who were largely responsible for the proliferation and further development of things that were not invented here. Like everything, there are exceptions, but we didn't just gradually become central to the world in some tragic cosmic fluke.
In the words of Chris Rock when asked if racism has decreased, "Well, I think white people have gotten less crazy." White people helping end slavery isn't something they deserve credit for, when the decision to start, continue and legitimize the slavery in America was made by white people. It's like a thief who decided to stop stealing. Good for him not stealing anymore, but screw that guy if he thinks he deserves anything for it.

As for the second point, LOL. Sure, the US made a lot of great inventions, but our civilization and "modernity" largely came from the earlier European Industrial age (which happened a bit before our own), combined with artistic/intellectual developments which arose from the Renaissance era. We can trace the beginnings of "western" modes of thought and societal constructs (like sewers and rational examination to arrive at the logical *logos* conclusion) back to the Greeks and Romans. It could be argued America wasn't a world power until WW1 at the earliest, but maybe as recently as WW2. America definitely had reasons why it became so powerful, but it wasn't all because "we are awesome." Not that I think you're saying that. New inventions and industry combined with terrible working conditions and the poverty in Europe as a result of WW1 are all probably factors which contributed.

I just realized something. "Modern" is one of those buzzwords we have to define. If you mean "modernity" as a mode of thought or philosophy, we could argue there's little difference between this and westernization. If you just mean "modern" as a method of time-keeping, then every society is modern if it still exists.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Closet Superhero said:
Therumancer said:
All sarcasm aside, I've felt there should actually be a "thank you white people" week as part of things like "Black History Month" as a reminder of tolerance and to limit all the "Black Powah" stuff (hopefully), by making it very clear that a lot of what blacks have happened because whites decided it was right to give it to them.
Oh, my. I'd like to think the absurdity of that suggestion speaks for itself.

On topic:

Most of those 'pitches' sound boring. Mainly because most of them have no story in them, just a character.
Not really, the very fact that some would consider it absurd gets to a lot of the central issues causing modern problems and racial tensions. The white vs. black divide as far as it goes today continues largely because of black culture being reared with a sense of enimity to white people combined with a sense of entitlement for the perception that unique wrongs were committed against them. This is done for political reasons as the ghost of racism is a powerful tool that can be used to manipulate voting blocks and political opinion.

As I pointed out, if you bothered to read all of what I've said on the subject, "blacks" actually formed most of the oldest civlizations and both created and practiced slavery throughout most of human history. While "white" civilizations *DID* continue this trend for a brief period of time in our comparitively brief reign as the dominant ethnicity (for those who want to break it down that way) we also *ended* that cycle. Blacks spent very little time in slavery compared to whites or other ethnicities.

What's more it's important to note that white guys really haven't enslaved many people, it's happened, but for the most part most of the slaving has been done by blacks and arabs, even during the period through the 1700-1800s. In reality all "whites" did was show up and pay money for people that had already been enslaved and relocate them. There are moral questions about this, but saying that whites took away the freedom of black people isn't entirely accurate during that period, the freedom of these people had already been taken away and all the white guys did was show up with trade goods and money.

Blacks have the advantage of having been enslaved at a very fortunate time when "white" morality was developing, and slavery happened to be abolished.

The point here is that there is nothing at all unique about white people having owned slaves, every people throughout history have done that. Whites ending slavery as an institution... well, that is pretty unique. The point here is that rather than being taught about the plight of black slaves and fingers being pointed at "whitey" exclusively, as much or more effort should be spent making it clear that we're the people who set them free.

Setting the black slaves free is a paticularly powerful point when you consider that throughout the sweep of history they really didn't deserve it. Only our "all men should be free" mentality really justified it. See, if you start getting into the logic of "your great, great grandfather owned my great great grandfather and I'm not going to get over it" which drives a lot of black politics, you can point out that this might have been true for a couple of generations, but when you look at the thousands of years Anglo Saxons spent in bondage at the hands of people from The Fertile crescent and the coastal kingdoms/empires of Africa prior to (and during) the reign of Rome, one can sort of make an arguement for poetic justice and turnabout being fair play.... we did not however do this, and instead followed a moral principle and decided to free a people that actually spent a very long time victimizing us.
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
Most of them might be good stories and would do well as books but would make lousy movies. A movie usually needs some kind of conflict to be entertaining and most of these scenarios don't have any.

And anyway several of these pitches have already been made into movies.

The misguided young man going to prison and the experience changing him is basically the plot of American History X. The science one is almost exactly the plot of "The Fountainhead" except replace science with architecture. Originally a book Fountainhead got made into a decent movie starring Gary Cooper.

Also I don't exactly what Bob has against the US but there are tons of movies without Americans in them. They tend to be (gasp) made in countries other than the US. Here is a good example: New Kids Turbo http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1648112/ A comedy where a bunch of unemployed rednecks decide they aren't going to pay for anything anymore and the small town cops are too incompetent to deal with them. It has both cerebral and grossout humor and a ton of "local colour" cameos and references that foreigners won't get but the movie still works without them.
 

HyenaThePirate

New member
Jan 8, 2009
1,412
0
0
Therumancer said:
All sarcasm aside, I've felt there should actually be a "thank you white people" week as part of things like "Black History Month" as a reminder of tolerance and to limit all the "Black Powah" stuff (hopefully), by making it very clear that a lot of what blacks have happened because whites decided it was right to give it to them. Slavery would never had ended if whites never changed their mind about it. The Civil Liberties movement would never had succeeded if whites didn't decide it was right. We aren't the bad guys, and were ultimatly crucial to all of this.

This same logic can apply in a similar way to those other points. Like it or not America is not only the dominant world power, but pretty much what defined modern civilization. While various nations try and take credit for inventions of people that were born there, the truth is a lot of these people had to come to the US for the enviroment to create their inventions. We're also the ones who were largely responsible for the proliferation and further development of things that were not invented here. Like everything, there are exceptions, but we didn't just gradually become central to the world in some tragic cosmic fluke.
As a black male American, I would personally like to stand up and applaud the frak out of you. And I'd support this 100%.

Look, I get the whole "history is written by the victors" thing, I really do, but the narrow, tunnel-vision of humanity is what keeps us all fighting over pointless b.s. and leads to people like Bob sticking his foot deep in the poo poo with posts like this.

To say that White people are RESPONSIBLE for blacks, women, and minorities getting civil rights is not exactly the full story, but neither is it to act like Blacks and minorities did it all alone completely against the "white man's oppressive regime." It was a JOINT effort between GOOD, decent people (many of whom were CHRISTIANS, for all the people that think religion is soooo evil) to correct a miscarriage of justice in our society. Free thinking, forward thinking individuals of all races worked TOGETHER and thusly I personally believe Black History Month should just be changed to Civil Rights history or American History month. Let EVERYONE be praised and celebrated for their contribution to the growth of our nation and the casting off of our former evils. I would be tickled pink to see someone who worked diligently for civil rights that was white being given honor and having their name recognized for their efforts to bring equality to ALL people during the civil rights movement, rather than just endless black people whose sole contribution was something like "wrote a poem."
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Samurai Goomba said:
Therumancer said:
All sarcasm aside, I've felt there should actually be a "thank you white people" week as part of things like "Black History Month" as a reminder of tolerance and to limit all the "Black Powah" stuff (hopefully), by making it very clear that a lot of what blacks have happened because whites decided it was right to give it to them. Slavery would never had ended if whites never changed their mind about it. The Civil Liberties movement would never had succeeded if whites didn't decide it was right. We aren't the bad guys, and were ultimatly crucial to all of this.

This same logic can apply in a similar way to those other points. Like it or not America is not only the dominant world power, but pretty much what defined modern civilization. While various nations try and take credit for inventions of people that were born there, the truth is a lot of these people had to come to the US for the enviroment to create their inventions. We're also the ones who were largely responsible for the proliferation and further development of things that were not invented here. Like everything, there are exceptions, but we didn't just gradually become central to the world in some tragic cosmic fluke.
In the words of Chris Rock when asked if racism has decreased, "Well, I think white people have gotten less crazy." White people helping end slavery isn't something they deserve credit for, when the decision to start, continue and legitimize the slavery in America was made by white people. It's like a thief who decided to stop stealing. Good for him not stealing anymore, but screw that guy if he thinks he deserves anything for it.

As for the second point, LOL. Sure, the US made a lot of great inventions, but our civilization and "modernity" largely came from the earlier European Industrial age (which happened a bit before our own), combined with artistic/intellectual developments which arose from the Renaissance era. We can trace the beginnings of "western" modes of thought and societal constructs (like sewers and rational examination to arrive at the logical *logos* conclusion) back to the Greeks and Romans. It could be argued America wasn't a world power until WW1 at the earliest, but maybe as recently as WW2. America definitely had reasons why it became so powerful, but it wasn't all because "we are awesome." Not that I think you're saying that. New inventions and industry combined with terrible working conditions and the poverty in Europe as a result of WW1 are all probably factors which contributed.

I just realized something. "Modern" is one of those buzzwords we have to define. If you mean "modernity" as a mode of thought or philosophy, we could argue there's little difference between this and westernization. If you just mean "modern" as a method of time-keeping, then every society is modern if it still exists.

Well of course Chris Rock sort of makes his living off of those perceptions. If he can't sell the idea of being crazy to bigoted white people who deserve it and need to be "educated" he sort of needs to find a new schtick since he'd go from being a comedic hero with a message, to just a jerk. :)

When it comes to slavery, it's important to understand that it started with the fertile crescent region where human civilization began, the first societies were those of dark skinned peoples throughout the middle east and down through Africa. For the longest time the victims of the slave trade were white people as "we" were the barbarians until the fall of Rome.

Through human history all people were slavers, and white people were not exempted from that to be fair, but it WAS white people who abolished the institution and has been striving to do away with it throughout the world. The white abolition of slavery is a far bigger deal than our practice of it, given that everyone did until we wound up pretty much running the world.

Most of the arguements made in favor of "blame whitey" boil down to "well, your great grandfather owned my great grandfather", yet we didn't practice slavery very long overall. If you want to get technical using that logic whites could point fingers right back and talk about the oppression of our ancestors under far less humane conditions for a much longer period of time. In the overall scope of history I could say turnabout is fair play, but I'm still glad slavery was abolished. The situation is such where I don't feel any paticular guilt over what my forefathers might have done to someone else's especially when his ancestors were even worse to mine.

As far as the overall sweep of history and technology goes, the US was insturmental in the creation and distribution of most modern technology, especially the latter point about distribution. We wound up becoming the world's biggest market for a reason.

The US didn't become the dominant world power until after "World War II" due to our largely isolationist sentiment. We probably could have been a big deal a lot sooner, but we chose not to. During "World War I" we demonstrated our abillity to be a massive power by ending the deadlock between the European powers of the time, and ending the war almost single handedly. We had very little in the way of a war machine or materials due to our isolationist and anti-war policies, but we had tons of people, and we dropped close to a million men on Europe where they almost literally picked up the guns of the cowering/demoralized french forces and carried them to war against the Germans. This is one of the big reasons the US talked about France being "surrender monkeys" there is more to it than just their behavior during World War II.

The US however build up a war machine AFTER World War I though continued it's isolationist policies, figuring it had better have more of a standing military in case it was ever needed again. The staggering display of power during World War I, combined with Japanese dislike of the US due to guys like Commodore Perry forcing their trade open to the rest of the world at one point was what motivated the pre-emptive strike (Pearl Habour) that arguably brought the US into the war.

AFTER World War II the attitudes of Russia combined with the failure of isolationism which we kind of realized at this point caused the US to enter the world more readily, and in the process it became the dominant world power. Not just due to our massive markets, and military strength, but due to our morality, and things like our massive abillity to produce wheat and beef.

None of this really matters so much as the point that we're talking about movies, and Bob is in his own way commenting on how America tends to be involved in pretty much every movie out there... and the point is that's because we're the dominant power in this era, we are a factor in pretty much everything for good or ill. It's sort of like a movie during the reign of The British Empire where it doesn't come up, even if covered only in the backround.

It's a case where Bob's politics are sort of overriding his common sense, I think he has a bad case of white American guilt, where I've long such come to grips with such things. In a world where everyone is a bastard I make no apologies for "my people" having been there ourselves, the differance is we at least try and do better by ending things like slavery, and I guess the very existance of guys like Bob makes my point about the US and our morality, as he's one of those guys who simply takes it too far... deeply into the realm of self depreciation.
 

Samurai Goomba

New member
Oct 7, 2008
3,679
0
0
Therumancer said:
Well, I agree with most of what you said. And sure, black people enslaved black people, and white people, and everyone enslaved everyone throughout history. Even so, America was built largely on slave labor and genocide (where is that not the case, lol-BUT this was relatively recent in terms of historical timeline), so we can't ignore that piece. And America clung to its slavery and repression of women longer than Europe did, unless I'm not remembering my history right. But then, our industrial revolution was later than Europe's too. Not that I'm implying America was "worse," but it was probably that same isolationist spirit that kept them from moving ahead with the social reforms in England. That or plain ol' hatred of the king. The western, coastal "Oregon" country was really racist, entitled, selfish and sexist for a long time. The only reason they didn't vote to enslave blacks there was they hated them so much, they actually banned black people from the entire AREA, free or slave. Dunno what my point with that example is, except maybe that bigotry might be considered worse than slavery because of long-term social implications.

I guess none of it really matters (I like rambling about history), and I think Bob is guilty and angry about a LOT of things. So much so that it has steeped into his work in a way that has become obvious to his audience. I'll probably be thought of as a token "Bob hater," but I think there are healthier ways to deal with a fixation on, say, childhood trauma/bullying or political disagreements than bringing it up every week in order to crush an obvious strawman so he can seem "right" and self-justified in his opinions. :/ We've all had those unhealthy fixations/grudges/guilt trips about something, but they're best handled and worked through privately, with the assistance of confidants/counselors, imo.
 

Closet Superhero

New member
May 24, 2009
43
0
0
Therumancer said:
Closet Superhero said:
Therumancer said:
All sarcasm aside, I've felt there should actually be a "thank you white people" week as part of things like "Black History Month" as a reminder of tolerance and to limit all the "Black Powah" stuff (hopefully), by making it very clear that a lot of what blacks have happened because whites decided it was right to give it to them.
Oh, my. I'd like to think the absurdity of that suggestion speaks for itself.
Not really, the very fact that some would consider it absurd gets to a lot of the central issues causing modern problems and racial tensions.
No, here is the absurdity. I take away your freedom. Then I say, 'You are a human like me, you deserve to live freely, so I free you. But remember to be thankful to me.' If it's true that we're all equally deserving of freedom, there is no need for thanks. Expecting eternal thanks for grranting something that is a basic right (as we now see it) is just another of reasserting some kind of superiority.

Therumancer said:
In reality all "whites" did was show up and pay money for people that had already been enslaved and relocate them.
Right. And 'all that does' is create a slave economy that was, at that point, the biggest and most lucrative in world history. There's no less culpability in that.

Therumancer said:
Blacks have the advantage of having been enslaved at a very fortunate time when "white" morality was developing, and slavery happened to be abolished.
Really? So the Abolishment somehow was good for all the generations of black slaves who lived in slavery before it?

Therumancer said:
one can sort of make an arguement for poetic justice and turnabout being fair play.... we did not however do this, and instead followed a moral principle and decided to free a people that actually spent a very long time victimizing us.
'We' didn't do anything. 'We' weren't victimised by 'them' before 'we' enslaved 'them'. The issue is that, RIGHT HERE AND NOW we live in an unequal society, with the determinants of that inequality being strongly associated with race. And the question is, why is that the case? Is it because some races are better than others? Or is it because of historical circumstances? If you're not racist, it is obviously that latter, and the issue becomes: how do we redress the problem. That is 'OUR' problem and our responsibility, and the abolishment of slavery does not diminish that responsibility. The Abolishment was just words anyway; it didn't magically make black and white people socially or economically equal.

Words are the easy part. So let's not congratulate ourselves too much. Besides, don't the glorious principles of freedom and equality get plenty of celebration as is? So what exactly are you complaining about, again?
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Lol these are really funny and so true.

OOOO I have one!

A movie in which a powerful sexy female witch with a magic siamese cat falls in love with some lame businessman guy who wants her to stay at home and be the perfect wife. Hilarity ensues. Near the end she realises that she will die slowly of toxic boredom and runs away with a cowboy dracula.

This causes the businessman to really examine his life and he tells his lazy fat overbearing boss to stick his job and his attitude up his bottom and sets up his own successful business. He later marries his pretty new business partner who loves kids and homemaking and at the end of the movie they all have a bbq together and laugh about the horrible choices they made previously and how happy they are now.

Hooray.
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,451
0
0
um well I thought there'd be more to this to make it worth reading but...
hey the slavery story was pretty cool. couldn't help but think of that slavery the game fake(?) trailer Escapist news posted recently
 

Silent_Protagonist

New member
Jul 6, 2011
55
0
0
CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!! >:|


* Immediately switches major from Chemistry to film. Then begins to furiously write scripts and screen-plays based on the concepts that Bob outlined in his post*
 

Browncoat86

New member
Mar 27, 2008
58
0
0
"When crooked thieves steal an ancient religious artifact from a primitive rural village, their greatest warrior must travel for the first time to the strange and unfamiliar world of The Big City to retrieve it. He fights many, many elaborate battles and succeeds in locating and defeating the sinister thieves, but ultimately does not bring back The Artifact. Instead, he discovers that in 'The Big City' people do not die constantly from common germs and minor injuries as they do in his primitive rural village on account of having access to modern medicine, health-standards and communication. He then sells the damn artifact at a huge profit so as to bring life saving medicine, superior farming equipment, food and a phone/internet connection to his people."
Really?... ... No, really?... ... REALLY?
Yes, because without modern technologies, life isn't worth living. Who in the hell are you to say that just because they live in a rural area and work without modern conveniences that their lives are somehow lessened? The arrogance is astounding.

"A man of spiritually devout persuasion is critically injured in a terrible car accident. Though he is brought to the hospital in time for doctors to save his life, his injuries are such that he is actually 'dead' for several minutes on the operating table, during which time he experiences ... nothing. No tunnel, no light, no angles, no dead pals, nothing. In a shocking twist, his newfound sense that the life he has is quite definitely all there is does not turn him into a bitter nihilist, but rather spurs him to become an infinitely better, freer and happier person who's determined to make the most of whatever time he has."
It is for this, above the other, that I believe I will no longer be viewing any of Bob's material. I will treat a man of my own faith like a brother, I will treat a man of another faith with respect and tolerance so long as he does the same for me. But I cannot abide a man of no faith.