That one inspired me somehow to make this in Paint.Labyrinth said:![]()
ZeroPunctuation.
I dunno, maybe it was the whole bowler hat thing that got me to make this one.
That one inspired me somehow to make this in Paint.Labyrinth said:![]()
ZeroPunctuation.
I'm with you on the unfortunate pedestal-like position that Dali and Picasso have. The background for my referencing them is that they're recognisable to people who don't know others and, with Picasso, I'm studying his Guernica for a school performance which gives me the background to use it.Fightgarr said:*Snip*
That's a tough one. It could easily be working within the bounds of pop-art illustration.Labyrinth said:I'm with you on the unfortunate pedestal-like position that Dali and Picasso have. The background for my referencing them is that they're recognisable to people who don't know others and, with Picasso, I'm studying his Guernica for a school performance which gives me the background to use it.
Not quite minimalist? What would you call it?
Hehhe. If I were to accuse you of being a dick I'd have to swing my GothPot around anyway.Fightgarr said:That's a tough one. It could easily be working within the bounds of pop-art illustration.
I'm honestly not sure. But:
![]()
![]()
Both are done by Barnett Newman.[/img]
Its minimalist in the literal sense for sure so I really won't bother you about it.Labyrinth said:Hehhe. If I were to accuse you of being a dick I'd have to swing my GothPot around anyway.
I've actually gone back and edited the Minimalist one. Here's the new version.
![]()
Sorry, quirk of speech. It's based around the phrase "pot calling a kettle black" for hypocrisy.Fightgarr said:Also, I'm totally unsure what a GothPot is therefore I have no idea what you mean.
Ah. Now I understand. Except I don't because I've never had an instance, ever, where I thought you were being a dick.Labyrinth said:Sorry, quirk of speech. It's based around the phrase "pot calling a kettle black" for hypocrisy.
Background is a tricky thing to learn. A lot of environment designers like to block out their design in a 3D modeling program just so that they get perspective right, then they paint over that. Its really a case of creating something simple to start with and slowly adding details to that. Once you have the basics down, then move on to more complex things like cities and complexes. Start with fields, mountains... things that don't have a lot in them that you can build on. Next would come more complex situations: crags, swampland, ruins. Then move onto things like forest and cityscape.Yokai said:Cool, this thread is still going. Here's something I did recently.
I'm trying to figure out how to do a decent background on the computer. My tablet skills are less than wonderful at this point--the lines were all done by hand.![]()
Think you did a good job with the flash pic, but I like your old avatar better. Not only was it more noticable, but "cuter" too.SharPhoe said:*snipped pictures of awesomeness*
I know, I know. It's hard to keep up the same quality of work and cuteness. I'll have to try a bit harder on the next one.New Troll said:Think you did a good job with the flash pic, but I like your old avatar better. Not only was it more noticable, but "cuter" too.SharPhoe said:*snipped pictures of awesomeness*
I did indeed use CS4 for both avatars before this one, but thanks for the thought anyway. The main reasons I tried this on in Flash were:WanderFreak said:Unless that's what you used for your other one, in which case disregard my ramblings.