Yeah, the dinosaur skull is pretty sweet. And I like the stumpy thing, it's funny, a clever idea.the monopoly guy post=18.72805.785691 said:I don't think anyone looked at mine either. They were bad but at least the last one was ok. I think.ThaBenMan post=18.72805.785515 said:Has anybody looked at my stuff?The link is back on pg. 2... it's cool, though. It sucks.
I smell an "I bet he's Cockney" situation a-brewing...NewClassic post=18.72805.785755 said:Time for more of NewClassic beingpretentiousfull of himselfhelpful?
*ahem*NewClassic post=18.72805.785755 said:To The Monopoly Guy
Your drawing was interesting, but that's not much else to say on it. It's foreground-intensive, it lacks shading, and doesn't have a lot of definition to it. The fact that you have to label it means you're not expressing the image, artistically, that you're trying to. The best way to fix this is probably to reference everything. Seriously, everything.
The right one is a great angle! Perfectly drawn. I am still trying to adjust myself to that >.<;;unabomberman post=18.72805.785353 said:Thanks NewClassic.
Image below
![]()
Got it done in a few minutes. It's very, very minimum cartoonized linework. Tell me what you think people.
Note: The hands are fugly, I know. Again, I was in a hurry and sketched it pretty quick.
Really good with color. I'm impressed. ^_^Enskie post=18.72805.785732 said:Now that NewClassic has very kindly provided me with the knowledge required to upload images, I am free to do so.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Its the jpeg.. I swear!!Alliecat post=18.72805.785912 said:Zen- That abstract is really pretty. I am really into the graphic/design style of work- especially when it has words incorporated into it somehow.
my own personal preference, would be to have some of it stick out from the muted quality of it. It's like you put a low-contract filter over it, and I wanted some of the flower to free it's way out of the overlay and be sharp.
To further my ego trip.. yes, co-incidentally. I'm very good at science, mostly because I have an analytical mind, huge amounts of curiosity, creativity and a wide general scientific knowledge and understanding. I also read and understand articles in scientific magazines and journals, such as Scientific American. Bow down, ye mere mortals.RAKtheUndead post=18.72805.783853 said:I'm just waiting for evidence of scientific talent before I condemn her for witchcraft (but secretly revere her as a goddess). Science is my yardstick of real talent.meatloaf231 post=18.72805.782783 said:Seriously. Nobody can be that well-learned, well-spoken, skilled at instrument(s), a great artist, and yet be that young.Monkfish Acc. post=18.72805.782767 said:Labyrinth, you get no kudos. You are clearly some sort of machine, or genetic experiment, designed to draw so well that it just becomes unfair. I blame science. Blast you, science!
She's a robot. Or a witch. Or a robot witch.
For the figuratives, it was images off of DeviantArt. My self portrait was done with a mirror, and I've done other sketches not posted yet from life. As for the flat nature, I don't believe that the scanning process helps there. It uses a different light to the one I draw with and view with, so images appear in a different way. Yes. I'm blaming equipment. Go me. Thanks for your feedback, and for the advice too. I need that.Alliecat post=18.72805.783451 said:Labrynth: Your Shading and contrasting is really good. You have lights and darks down. Are you using a live model for these pictures, or a magazine picture? Magazine are flat, and flatten out the model, so sometimes, the translation can get skewered- watch out!
Don't be afraid to either get rid of all your lines, or translate everything into line work. (the lack of definition around your face in the profile picture could be worked a bit more)
Ares Tyr post=18.72805.786262 said:Enskie, that knight is bad ass, and the photoshops are rather pretty.
Labyrinth post=18.72805.786028 said:Enskie your stuff is fantastic. I love the Ministery of Truth thing. Really calls out to my angsty political irritation.
Firstly, massive ego-trip right there...Alliecat post=18.72805.785905 said:Really good with color. I'm impressed. ^_^Enskie post=18.72805.785732 said:Now that NewClassic has very kindly provided me with the knowledge required to upload images, I am free to do so.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I really like the photography and the way you photoshop it. It looks wonderful.
It's no less of an artform to be able to edit images than it is to create them. They're just different thing to try. Photomanipluation has amounted some amazing art in its time as a possibility.Enskie post=18.72805.786396 said:Firstly, massive ego-trip right there...
Umm..wow, people like this stuff. I was told by quite a few people to get some 'real' skill and make some of my own artwork because, with exception to the "Ministry Of Truth" image, all of those are just edits in Photoshop CS2, with the Minitrue(readers of 1984 ought to get that) one having been made from scratch, though again in CS2.
Thank you very much, I am both gladdened and slightly stunned that people genuinely took an interest in my work and found it to be decent.
I get told all the time my art is weird, rip-off or other things like-'contemporary' (which I'm still waiting for that person to explain in his own words)Enskie post=18.72805.786396 said:Ares Tyr post=18.72805.786262 said:Enskie, that knight is bad ass, and the photoshops are rather pretty.Labyrinth post=18.72805.786028 said:Enskie your stuff is fantastic. I love the Ministery of Truth thing. Really calls out to my angsty political irritation.Firstly, massive ego-trip right there...Alliecat post=18.72805.785905 said:Really good with color. I'm impressed. ^_^Enskie post=18.72805.785732 said:Now that NewClassic has very kindly provided me with the knowledge required to upload images, I am free to do so.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I really like the photography and the way you photoshop it. It looks wonderful.
Umm..wow, people like this stuff. I was told by quite a few people to get some 'real' skill and make some of my own artwork because, with exception to the "Ministry Of Truth" image, all of those are just edits in Photoshop CS2, with the Minitrue(readers of 1984 ought to get that) one having been made from scratch, though again in CS2.
Thank you very much, I am both gladdened and slightly stunned that people genuinely took an interest in my work and found it to be decent.
There just needs to be a ban on Naruto full stop.TheNecroswanson post=18.72805.786533 said:Anyone out there agree with me that DA needs to put a ban on Naruto fan art? Seriously, it's like.....80% of the damn site.
OH GOD YES! I'm sick of signing onto Deviant art and it tells me- This is the new populare art! -Naruto-Naruto_naruto_naruto-NarutoTheNecroswanson post=18.72805.786533 said:Think as if everyone started painting Picasso pictures. That would make it contemporary, the "in thing" to do. Though I liked your gallery, it just seemed to be on par with, well, a good 65% of what I see, and that's just me, on DA and other web sites. It feels like it doesn't add anything new or original. It just feels like you have a lot of potential, and it goes to your standard Betty Page fan art. (simple analogy, not saying anything)Alliecat post=18.72805.785646 said:Photoshop filters canbe nice- if you adjust them, and use them sparingly. Using them a lot or as a main part of your picture just shouts out -noob-. (in my opinion, of course)TheNecroswanson post=18.72805.783517 said:Don't know what you mean. This is my fourth image using photoshop's filters and it's worked fine for me so far. I wanted the image to look like a comicesque night scene. It had a fully set up background and everything. I'm pleased with how they worked to create light, shadow, and simulate the visibility of objects in darkness with a light source. Though the light source was a little strong but that was my errror.Alliecat post=18.72805.783451 said:For other photoshop users: Be warned! Filters aren't that cool. They are a trap!
![]()
Also, I checked out your, I think it was yours, DA, and though I liked it, it fealt too contemporary.
Contemporary? Can you explain a bit what you mean by that?
DISCLAIMER: I know my art is just as goofy and contemporary from an anime standpoint as well. I just suck that badly.
Anyone out there agree with me that DA needs to put a ban on Naruto fan art? Seriously, it's like.....80% of the damn site.