Kapol said:
The idea that the director had the courage to basically give Kim Jong the finger in his own movie is awesome though.
Steve the Pocket said:
I always suspected Kim was a bit thick, but missing the obvious symbolism in having the monster that by his own demand represented Communism turn on the people it fought to save?
esperandote said:
The director guy really had balls to do that. Kim Jong didn't noticed it or punished him?
Actually, Bob may have got the wrong idea on that one.
The BBC claims the film is actually meant to be a cautionary tale about
Capitalism, not an inspirational film about Communism. So the message is "Capitalism may appear to liberate you, but in the end it will just enslave you in a different way".
North Korean propaganda is (supposedly) very focused on the idea of "Capitalist Greed" as a insatiable force. Hence the big monster demanding to be fed iron.
C.S.Strowbridge said:
Amazingly, I knew that story. Maybe not all of the details, but I knew about the kidnappings, the movies, and the eventual escape.
It was repeated ad nauseam by the British press in the week(s) after he died. Maybe you saw it on the BBC news website?
Sylveria said:
Wonder how long till the president starts claiming divine right.
Well, the first thing he'd need to do is remove the two-terms limit. In the UK, we really
can have Prime Ministers who rule for decades (providing they keep being voted back in). We also have a monarch who really
is the head of the Church of England, with all the "divine right" that goes with it.
So I think you're pretty safe. The USA is quite a long way away from having a dictatorship.
